使用桡动脉远端入路进行移植血管造影的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。

IF 1.6 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Future cardiology Pub Date : 2024-01-01 Epub Date: 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1080/14796678.2024.2373592
Hamid Iqbal, Fnu Manoj Kumar, Farrukh Mehmood, Fnu Kiran, Kajal Bai, Kajal Kumari, Fnu Suman, Deepak Kumar, Deepa Rani, Saroop Kumar Alies Rahol Rai, Jahanzeb Malik, Waheed Akhtar
{"title":"使用桡动脉远端入路进行移植血管造影的结果:一项回顾性队列研究。","authors":"Hamid Iqbal, Fnu Manoj Kumar, Farrukh Mehmood, Fnu Kiran, Kajal Bai, Kajal Kumari, Fnu Suman, Deepak Kumar, Deepa Rani, Saroop Kumar Alies Rahol Rai, Jahanzeb Malik, Waheed Akhtar","doi":"10.1080/14796678.2024.2373592","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of graft angiography using these two approaches.<b>Methods:</b> Medical records and angiographic data of adult patients who underwent graft angiography between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed.<b>Results:</b> The study included 452 patients in the distal radial access (DRA) group and 960 patients in the femoral access group. Angiographic characteristics showed a higher prevalence of triple vessel disease in the femoral access group (29.8% vs. 20.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.012). The DRA group had a procedural success rate of 93.0%, while the femoral access group had a higher success rate of 95.8%. The odds ratio was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46-0.94), indicating lower odds of procedural success in the DRA group.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our study suggests that both DRA and femoral access are effective and safe approaches for graft angiography after coronary artery bypass surgery.</p>","PeriodicalId":12589,"journal":{"name":"Future cardiology","volume":" ","pages":"479-484"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-01-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486300/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Outcomes of graft angiography with distal radial access: a retrospective cohort study.\",\"authors\":\"Hamid Iqbal, Fnu Manoj Kumar, Farrukh Mehmood, Fnu Kiran, Kajal Bai, Kajal Kumari, Fnu Suman, Deepak Kumar, Deepa Rani, Saroop Kumar Alies Rahol Rai, Jahanzeb Malik, Waheed Akhtar\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/14796678.2024.2373592\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p><b>Background:</b> This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of graft angiography using these two approaches.<b>Methods:</b> Medical records and angiographic data of adult patients who underwent graft angiography between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed.<b>Results:</b> The study included 452 patients in the distal radial access (DRA) group and 960 patients in the femoral access group. Angiographic characteristics showed a higher prevalence of triple vessel disease in the femoral access group (29.8% vs. 20.8%; <i>p</i> = 0.012). The DRA group had a procedural success rate of 93.0%, while the femoral access group had a higher success rate of 95.8%. The odds ratio was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46-0.94), indicating lower odds of procedural success in the DRA group.<b>Conclusion:</b> Our study suggests that both DRA and femoral access are effective and safe approaches for graft angiography after coronary artery bypass surgery.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":12589,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Future cardiology\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"479-484\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-01-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11486300/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Future cardiology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2373592\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"2024/7/15 0:00:00\",\"PubModel\":\"Epub\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Future cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14796678.2024.2373592","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"2024/7/15 0:00:00","PubModel":"Epub","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:这项回顾性队列研究旨在比较使用这两种方法进行移植血管造影的结果。研究方法分析了 2020 年 1 月至 2022 年 12 月期间接受移植物血管造影术的成年患者的病历和血管造影数据。结果研究包括 452 名桡动脉远端入路(DRA)组患者和 960 名股动脉入路组患者。血管造影特征显示,股动脉入路组三血管疾病的发生率更高(29.8% 对 20.8%;P = 0.012)。DRA 组的手术成功率为 93.0%,而股骨入路组的成功率更高,为 95.8%。几率比为 0.66(95% CI:0.46-0.94),表明 DRA 组的手术成功率较低。结论我们的研究表明,DRA 和股动脉入路都是冠状动脉搭桥手术后进行移植血管造影的有效且安全的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Outcomes of graft angiography with distal radial access: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: This retrospective cohort study aimed to compare the outcomes of graft angiography using these two approaches.Methods: Medical records and angiographic data of adult patients who underwent graft angiography between January 2020 and December 2022 were analyzed.Results: The study included 452 patients in the distal radial access (DRA) group and 960 patients in the femoral access group. Angiographic characteristics showed a higher prevalence of triple vessel disease in the femoral access group (29.8% vs. 20.8%; p = 0.012). The DRA group had a procedural success rate of 93.0%, while the femoral access group had a higher success rate of 95.8%. The odds ratio was 0.66 (95% CI: 0.46-0.94), indicating lower odds of procedural success in the DRA group.Conclusion: Our study suggests that both DRA and femoral access are effective and safe approaches for graft angiography after coronary artery bypass surgery.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Future cardiology
Future cardiology CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
5.90%
发文量
87
期刊介绍: Research advances have contributed to improved outcomes across all specialties, but the rate of advancement in cardiology has been exceptional. Concurrently, the population of patients with cardiac conditions continues to grow and greater public awareness has increased patients" expectations of new drugs and devices. Future Cardiology (ISSN 1479-6678) reflects this new era of cardiology and highlights the new molecular approach to advancing cardiovascular therapy. Coverage will also reflect the major technological advances in bioengineering in cardiology in terms of advanced and robust devices, miniaturization, imaging, system modeling and information management issues.
期刊最新文献
Electrocardiographic and biochemical predictors of left ventricular remodeling early after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction. Severe acute recoil following transcatheter aortic valve replacement with a self-expanding prosthesis in a heavily calcified bicuspid aortic valve. Single-center initial experience with a new pulsed-field ablation system: pulmonary vein isolation lesions and beyond. Soft drinks, fish oil and atrial fibrillation. Cardiovascular magnetic resonance versus echocardiography derived left ventricular ejection fraction for decision-making.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1