冠状动脉粥样硬化进展提供了增量预后价值,并优化了计算机断层扫描血管造影的风险再分类。

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Journal of Thoracic Imaging Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1097/RTI.0000000000000793
Qingchao Meng, Yunqiang An, Li Zhao, Na Zhao, Hankun Yan, Jingxi Wang, Yutao Zhou, Bin Lu, Yang Gao
{"title":"冠状动脉粥样硬化进展提供了增量预后价值,并优化了计算机断层扫描血管造影的风险再分类。","authors":"Qingchao Meng, Yunqiang An, Li Zhao, Na Zhao, Hankun Yan, Jingxi Wang, Yutao Zhou, Bin Lu, Yang Gao","doi":"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000793","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the prognostic value and risk reclassification ability of coronary atherosclerosis progression through serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease who underwent serial CCTA. Coronary atherosclerosis progression was represented by coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and segment stenosis score (SSS) progression. The baseline and follow-up CCTA characteristics and coronary atherosclerosis progression were compared. Furthermore, the incremental prognostic value and reclassification ability of three models (model 1, baseline risk factors; model 2, model 1 + SSS; and model 3, model 2 + SSS progression) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 516 patients (aged 56.40 ± 9.56 y, 67.4% men) were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 65.29 months, 114 MACE occurred. The MACE group exhibited higher CACS and SSS than the non-MACE group at baseline and follow-up CCTA (P < 0.001), and demonstrated higher coronary atherosclerosis progression than the non-MACE group (ΔSSS: 2.63 ± 2.50 vs 1.06 ± 1.78, P < 0.001; ΔCACS: 115.15 ± 186.66 vs 89.91 ± 173.08, P = 0.019). SSS progression provided additional prognostic information (C-index = 0.757 vs 0.715, P < 0.001; integrated discrimination index = 0.066, P < 0.001) and improved the reclassification ability of risk (categorical-net reclassification index = 0.149, P = 0.015) compared with model 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coronary atherosclerosis progression through CCTA significantly increased the prognostic value and risk stratification for MACE compared with baseline risk factor evaluation and CCTA only.</p>","PeriodicalId":49974,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.\",\"authors\":\"Qingchao Meng, Yunqiang An, Li Zhao, Na Zhao, Hankun Yan, Jingxi Wang, Yutao Zhou, Bin Lu, Yang Gao\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/RTI.0000000000000793\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Purpose: </strong>This study investigated the prognostic value and risk reclassification ability of coronary atherosclerosis progression through serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).</p><p><strong>Materials and methods: </strong>This study enrolled patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease who underwent serial CCTA. Coronary atherosclerosis progression was represented by coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and segment stenosis score (SSS) progression. The baseline and follow-up CCTA characteristics and coronary atherosclerosis progression were compared. Furthermore, the incremental prognostic value and reclassification ability of three models (model 1, baseline risk factors; model 2, model 1 + SSS; and model 3, model 2 + SSS progression) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were compared.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>In total, 516 patients (aged 56.40 ± 9.56 y, 67.4% men) were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 65.29 months, 114 MACE occurred. The MACE group exhibited higher CACS and SSS than the non-MACE group at baseline and follow-up CCTA (P < 0.001), and demonstrated higher coronary atherosclerosis progression than the non-MACE group (ΔSSS: 2.63 ± 2.50 vs 1.06 ± 1.78, P < 0.001; ΔCACS: 115.15 ± 186.66 vs 89.91 ± 173.08, P = 0.019). SSS progression provided additional prognostic information (C-index = 0.757 vs 0.715, P < 0.001; integrated discrimination index = 0.066, P < 0.001) and improved the reclassification ability of risk (categorical-net reclassification index = 0.149, P = 0.015) compared with model 2.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Coronary atherosclerosis progression through CCTA significantly increased the prognostic value and risk stratification for MACE compared with baseline risk factor evaluation and CCTA only.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49974,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Thoracic Imaging\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000793\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Thoracic Imaging","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/RTI.0000000000000793","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:本研究通过连续冠状动脉计算机断层扫描血管造影(CCTA)研究冠状动脉粥样硬化进展的预后价值和风险再分类能力:本研究招募了接受连续 CCTA 检查的疑似或确诊冠状动脉疾病患者。冠状动脉粥样硬化的进展表现为冠状动脉钙化评分(CACS)和节段狭窄评分(SSS)的进展。比较了基线和随访 CCTA 特征及冠状动脉粥样硬化进展。此外,还比较了三种模型(模型 1,基线风险因素;模型 2,模型 1 + SSS;模型 3,模型 2 + SSS 进展)对主要不良心血管事件(MACEs)的增量预后价值和再分类能力:共有 516 名患者(年龄为 56.40 ± 9.56 岁,67.4% 为男性)入组。在平均 65.29 个月的随访期间,共发生了 114 起 MACE。在基线和随访 CCTA 时,MACE 组的 CACS 和 SSS 均高于非 MACE 组(P < 0.001),冠状动脉粥样硬化进展也高于非 MACE 组(ΔSSS:2.63 ± 2.50 vs 1.06 ± 1.78,P < 0.001;ΔCACS:115.15 ± 186.66 vs 89.91 ± 173.08,P = 0.019)。与模型 2 相比,SSS 进展提供了额外的预后信息(C 指数 = 0.757 vs 0.715,P < 0.001;综合分辨指数 = 0.066,P < 0.001),并提高了风险再分类能力(分类-网络再分类指数 = 0.149,P = 0.015):结论:与仅进行基线危险因素评估和 CCTA 相比,通过 CCTA 评估冠状动脉粥样硬化进展可显著提高 MACE 的预后价值和风险分层能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coronary Atherosclerosis Progression Provides Incremental Prognostic Value and Optimizes Risk Reclassification by Computed Tomography Angiography.

Purpose: This study investigated the prognostic value and risk reclassification ability of coronary atherosclerosis progression through serial coronary computed tomography angiography (CCTA).

Materials and methods: This study enrolled patients with suspected or confirmed coronary artery disease who underwent serial CCTA. Coronary atherosclerosis progression was represented by coronary artery calcium score (CACS) and segment stenosis score (SSS) progression. The baseline and follow-up CCTA characteristics and coronary atherosclerosis progression were compared. Furthermore, the incremental prognostic value and reclassification ability of three models (model 1, baseline risk factors; model 2, model 1 + SSS; and model 3, model 2 + SSS progression) for major adverse cardiovascular events (MACEs) were compared.

Results: In total, 516 patients (aged 56.40 ± 9.56 y, 67.4% men) were enrolled. During a mean follow-up of 65.29 months, 114 MACE occurred. The MACE group exhibited higher CACS and SSS than the non-MACE group at baseline and follow-up CCTA (P < 0.001), and demonstrated higher coronary atherosclerosis progression than the non-MACE group (ΔSSS: 2.63 ± 2.50 vs 1.06 ± 1.78, P < 0.001; ΔCACS: 115.15 ± 186.66 vs 89.91 ± 173.08, P = 0.019). SSS progression provided additional prognostic information (C-index = 0.757 vs 0.715, P < 0.001; integrated discrimination index = 0.066, P < 0.001) and improved the reclassification ability of risk (categorical-net reclassification index = 0.149, P = 0.015) compared with model 2.

Conclusions: Coronary atherosclerosis progression through CCTA significantly increased the prognostic value and risk stratification for MACE compared with baseline risk factor evaluation and CCTA only.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Thoracic Imaging
Journal of Thoracic Imaging 医学-核医学
CiteScore
7.10
自引率
9.10%
发文量
87
审稿时长
6-12 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Thoracic Imaging (JTI) provides authoritative information on all aspects of the use of imaging techniques in the diagnosis of cardiac and pulmonary diseases. Original articles and analytical reviews published in this timely journal provide the very latest thinking of leading experts concerning the use of chest radiography, computed tomography, magnetic resonance imaging, positron emission tomography, ultrasound, and all other promising imaging techniques in cardiopulmonary radiology. Official Journal of the Society of Thoracic Radiology: Japanese Society of Thoracic Radiology Korean Society of Thoracic Radiology European Society of Thoracic Imaging.
期刊最新文献
Optimizing Quantum Iterative Reconstruction for Ultra-high-resolution Photon-counting Computed Tomography of the Lung. Quantitative Chest Computed Tomography for Progression of Interstitial Lung Disease in Antisynthetase Patients. Evaluating Mediastinal Lymph Node Metastasis of Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Using Mono-exponential, Bi-exponential, and Stretched-exponential Models of Diffusion-weighted Imaging. Factors Associated With Delay in Lung Cancer Diagnosis and Surgery in a Lung Cancer Screening Program. Longitudinal Changes of CT-radiomic and Systemic Inflammatory Features Predict Survival in Advanced Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer Patients Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1