在股四头肌设置练习中,语言提示对肌电图活动的影响。

IF 2.6 2区 医学 Q1 SPORT SCIENCES Journal of Athletic Training Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.4085/1062-6050-0118.23
Connor Frerichs, Joseph DeHope, Maggie Chamberlain, Dylan Bassett, Brooke Farmer, Anastasia Kyvelidou, Mitchel Magrini, Terry L Grindstaff
{"title":"在股四头肌设置练习中,语言提示对肌电图活动的影响。","authors":"Connor Frerichs, Joseph DeHope, Maggie Chamberlain, Dylan Bassett, Brooke Farmer, Anastasia Kyvelidou, Mitchel Magrini, Terry L Grindstaff","doi":"10.4085/1062-6050-0118.23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Context: </strong>A quadriceps setting (quad set) exercise is commonly utilized following knee injury, but there is great variation in cues that clinicians provide to patients when performing the exercise.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if internal, external, or visual cues results in the greatest quadriceps electromyographical (EMG) activity during a quadriceps setting exercise in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University research laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty healthy individuals volunteered for this study. Participants were given one of five cues in a randomized order: internal cue \"tighten your thigh muscles,\" internal cue \"push your knee down,\" external cue \"push into the bolster,\" external cue \"push into the strap,\" or visual biofeedback using the cue \"raise the value on the screen as high as you can.\"</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Normalized vastus lateralis EMG activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both visual biofeedback (83.2±24.9%) and \"press into the strap\" (76.8±24.4%) produced significantly greater (p< 0.001) EMG activity than the push knee down (53.2±27.0%), tighten thigh (52.7±27.3%), or push into the bolster (50.8±26.3) conditions. There was no significant difference (p= 0.10) between the visual biofeedback and \"press into the strap\" conditions as well as no significant difference (p> 0.38) between the push knee down, tighten thigh, or push into the bolster conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If the clinical aim during a quadriceps setting exercise is to obtain the greatest volitional muscle recruitment, the use of visual biofeedback or pressing into a strap is recommended.</p>","PeriodicalId":54875,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Athletic Training","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The effects of verbal cues on EMG activity during a quadriceps setting exercise.\",\"authors\":\"Connor Frerichs, Joseph DeHope, Maggie Chamberlain, Dylan Bassett, Brooke Farmer, Anastasia Kyvelidou, Mitchel Magrini, Terry L Grindstaff\",\"doi\":\"10.4085/1062-6050-0118.23\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Context: </strong>A quadriceps setting (quad set) exercise is commonly utilized following knee injury, but there is great variation in cues that clinicians provide to patients when performing the exercise.</p><p><strong>Objectives: </strong>To determine if internal, external, or visual cues results in the greatest quadriceps electromyographical (EMG) activity during a quadriceps setting exercise in healthy individuals.</p><p><strong>Design: </strong>Descriptive laboratory study.</p><p><strong>Setting: </strong>University research laboratory.</p><p><strong>Participants: </strong>Thirty healthy individuals volunteered for this study. Participants were given one of five cues in a randomized order: internal cue \\\"tighten your thigh muscles,\\\" internal cue \\\"push your knee down,\\\" external cue \\\"push into the bolster,\\\" external cue \\\"push into the strap,\\\" or visual biofeedback using the cue \\\"raise the value on the screen as high as you can.\\\"</p><p><strong>Main outcome measures: </strong>Normalized vastus lateralis EMG activity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Both visual biofeedback (83.2±24.9%) and \\\"press into the strap\\\" (76.8±24.4%) produced significantly greater (p< 0.001) EMG activity than the push knee down (53.2±27.0%), tighten thigh (52.7±27.3%), or push into the bolster (50.8±26.3) conditions. There was no significant difference (p= 0.10) between the visual biofeedback and \\\"press into the strap\\\" conditions as well as no significant difference (p> 0.38) between the push knee down, tighten thigh, or push into the bolster conditions.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>If the clinical aim during a quadriceps setting exercise is to obtain the greatest volitional muscle recruitment, the use of visual biofeedback or pressing into a strap is recommended.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":54875,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Athletic Training\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0118.23\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SPORT SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Athletic Training","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4085/1062-6050-0118.23","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SPORT SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:股四头肌设置(quad set)练习通常在膝关节受伤后使用,但临床医生在进行该练习时向患者提供的提示存在很大差异:目的:确定在健康人进行股四头肌设置练习时,内部、外部或视觉提示是否会导致最大的股四头肌肌电图(EMG)活动:设计:描述性实验室研究:环境:大学研究实验室:30 名健康人自愿参加本研究。参与者按随机顺序接受五种提示中的一种:内部提示 "收紧大腿肌肉"、内部提示 "将膝盖向下推"、外部提示 "推入长枕"、外部提示 "推入背带",或使用提示 "尽可能提高屏幕上的数值 "进行视觉生物反馈:结果:视觉生物反馈(83.2±24.9%)和 "压入背带"(76.8±24.4%)产生的肌电图活动均显著高于(p< 0.001)"向下推膝盖"(53.2±27.0%)、"收紧大腿"(52.7±27.3%)或 "压入支撑物"(50.8±26.3)。视觉生物反馈和 "按压背带 "条件之间无明显差异(p= 0.10),按压膝关节、收紧大腿或按压长枕条件之间也无明显差异(p> 0.38):结论:如果股四头肌设置训练的临床目标是获得最大程度的自主肌肉募集,建议使用视觉生物反馈或按压背带。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The effects of verbal cues on EMG activity during a quadriceps setting exercise.

Context: A quadriceps setting (quad set) exercise is commonly utilized following knee injury, but there is great variation in cues that clinicians provide to patients when performing the exercise.

Objectives: To determine if internal, external, or visual cues results in the greatest quadriceps electromyographical (EMG) activity during a quadriceps setting exercise in healthy individuals.

Design: Descriptive laboratory study.

Setting: University research laboratory.

Participants: Thirty healthy individuals volunteered for this study. Participants were given one of five cues in a randomized order: internal cue "tighten your thigh muscles," internal cue "push your knee down," external cue "push into the bolster," external cue "push into the strap," or visual biofeedback using the cue "raise the value on the screen as high as you can."

Main outcome measures: Normalized vastus lateralis EMG activity.

Results: Both visual biofeedback (83.2±24.9%) and "press into the strap" (76.8±24.4%) produced significantly greater (p< 0.001) EMG activity than the push knee down (53.2±27.0%), tighten thigh (52.7±27.3%), or push into the bolster (50.8±26.3) conditions. There was no significant difference (p= 0.10) between the visual biofeedback and "press into the strap" conditions as well as no significant difference (p> 0.38) between the push knee down, tighten thigh, or push into the bolster conditions.

Conclusions: If the clinical aim during a quadriceps setting exercise is to obtain the greatest volitional muscle recruitment, the use of visual biofeedback or pressing into a strap is recommended.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Athletic Training
Journal of Athletic Training 医学-运动科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
6.10%
发文量
106
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: The mission of the Journal of Athletic Training is to enhance communication among professionals interested in the quality of health care for the physically active through education and research in prevention, evaluation, management and rehabilitation of injuries. The Journal of Athletic Training offers research you can use in daily practice. It keeps you abreast of scientific advancements that ultimately define professional standards of care - something you can''t be without if you''re responsible for the well-being of patients.
期刊最新文献
Cortical Changes of Dual Cognitive-Task Balance Training in Patients With Chronic Ankle Instability: A Randomized Trial. Influence of Anterior Talofibular Ligament Injury and Ankle Anterior Displacement on Symptoms in Individuals With Chronic Ankle Instability. People With Patellofemoral Pain Have Bilateral Deficits in Physical Performance Regardless of Pain Laterality. Prediction of Recurrent Lateral Ankle Sprain and Ankle Pain Using Applied Care Strategies and Patient-Reported Outcomes. Single-Leg Hop Performance After Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction: Ready for Landing but Cleared for Take-Off?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1