关于食品中四溴双酚 A(TBBPA)及其衍生物的最新科学意见。

IF 3.3 3区 农林科学 Q2 FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY EFSA Journal Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859
EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM), Dieter Schrenk, Margherita Bignami, Laurent Bodin, James Kevin Chipman, Jesús del Mazo, Bettina Grasl-Kraupp, Christer Hogstrand, Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom, Jean-Charles Leblanc, Carlo Stefano Nebbia, Elsa Nielsen, Evangelia Ntzani, Annette Petersen, Salomon Sand, Tanja Schwerdtle, Heather Wallace, Diane Benford, Andy Hart, Henri Schroeder, Martin Rose, Martine Vrijheid, Eirini Kouloura, Luisa Ramos Bordajandi, Francesca Riolo, Christiane Vleminckx
{"title":"关于食品中四溴双酚 A(TBBPA)及其衍生物的最新科学意见。","authors":"EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM),&nbsp;Dieter Schrenk,&nbsp;Margherita Bignami,&nbsp;Laurent Bodin,&nbsp;James Kevin Chipman,&nbsp;Jesús del Mazo,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Christer Hogstrand,&nbsp;Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Carlo Stefano Nebbia,&nbsp;Elsa Nielsen,&nbsp;Evangelia Ntzani,&nbsp;Annette Petersen,&nbsp;Salomon Sand,&nbsp;Tanja Schwerdtle,&nbsp;Heather Wallace,&nbsp;Diane Benford,&nbsp;Andy Hart,&nbsp;Henri Schroeder,&nbsp;Martin Rose,&nbsp;Martine Vrijheid,&nbsp;Eirini Kouloura,&nbsp;Luisa Ramos Bordajandi,&nbsp;Francesca Riolo,&nbsp;Christiane Vleminckx","doi":"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2011 risk assessment on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and five derivatives in food. Neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity were considered as the critical effects of TBBPA in rodent studies. The available evidence indicates that the carcinogenicity of TBBPA occurs via non-genotoxic mechanisms. Taking into account the new data, the CONTAM Panel considered it appropriate to set a tolerable daily intake (TDI). Based on decreased interest in social interaction in male mice, a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 0.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day was identified and selected as the reference point for the risk characterisation. Applying the default uncertainty factor of 100 for inter- and intraspecies variability, and a factor of 3 to extrapolate from the LOAEL to NOAEL, a TDI for TBBPA of 0.7 μg/kg bw per day was established. Around 2100 analytical results for TBBPA in food were used to estimate dietary exposure for the European population. The most important contributors to the chronic dietary LB exposure to TBBPA were fish and seafood, meat and meat products and milk and dairy products. The exposure estimates to TBBPA were all below the TDI, including those estimated for breastfed and formula-fed infants. Accounting for the uncertainties affecting the assessment, the CONTAM Panel concluded with 90%–95% certainty that the current dietary exposure to TBBPA does not raise a health concern for any of the population groups considered. There were insufficient data on the toxicity of any of the TBBPA derivatives to derive reference points, or to allow a comparison with TBBPA that would support assignment to an assessment group for the purposes of combined risk assessment.</p>","PeriodicalId":11657,"journal":{"name":"EFSA Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247339/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Update of the scientific opinion on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and its derivatives in food\",\"authors\":\"EFSA Panel on Contaminants in the Food Chain (CONTAM),&nbsp;Dieter Schrenk,&nbsp;Margherita Bignami,&nbsp;Laurent Bodin,&nbsp;James Kevin Chipman,&nbsp;Jesús del Mazo,&nbsp;Bettina Grasl-Kraupp,&nbsp;Christer Hogstrand,&nbsp;Laurentius (Ron) Hoogenboom,&nbsp;Jean-Charles Leblanc,&nbsp;Carlo Stefano Nebbia,&nbsp;Elsa Nielsen,&nbsp;Evangelia Ntzani,&nbsp;Annette Petersen,&nbsp;Salomon Sand,&nbsp;Tanja Schwerdtle,&nbsp;Heather Wallace,&nbsp;Diane Benford,&nbsp;Andy Hart,&nbsp;Henri Schroeder,&nbsp;Martin Rose,&nbsp;Martine Vrijheid,&nbsp;Eirini Kouloura,&nbsp;Luisa Ramos Bordajandi,&nbsp;Francesca Riolo,&nbsp;Christiane Vleminckx\",\"doi\":\"10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2011 risk assessment on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and five derivatives in food. Neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity were considered as the critical effects of TBBPA in rodent studies. The available evidence indicates that the carcinogenicity of TBBPA occurs via non-genotoxic mechanisms. Taking into account the new data, the CONTAM Panel considered it appropriate to set a tolerable daily intake (TDI). Based on decreased interest in social interaction in male mice, a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 0.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day was identified and selected as the reference point for the risk characterisation. Applying the default uncertainty factor of 100 for inter- and intraspecies variability, and a factor of 3 to extrapolate from the LOAEL to NOAEL, a TDI for TBBPA of 0.7 μg/kg bw per day was established. Around 2100 analytical results for TBBPA in food were used to estimate dietary exposure for the European population. The most important contributors to the chronic dietary LB exposure to TBBPA were fish and seafood, meat and meat products and milk and dairy products. The exposure estimates to TBBPA were all below the TDI, including those estimated for breastfed and formula-fed infants. Accounting for the uncertainties affecting the assessment, the CONTAM Panel concluded with 90%–95% certainty that the current dietary exposure to TBBPA does not raise a health concern for any of the population groups considered. There were insufficient data on the toxicity of any of the TBBPA derivatives to derive reference points, or to allow a comparison with TBBPA that would support assignment to an assessment group for the purposes of combined risk assessment.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":11657,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247339/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"EFSA Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"EFSA Journal","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.2903/j.efsa.2024.8859","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"FOOD SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

欧盟委员会要求欧洲食品安全局更新其 2011 年对食品中四溴双酚 A(TBBPA)和五种衍生物的风险评估。在啮齿动物研究中,神经毒性和致癌性被认为是四溴双酚 A 的关键影响。现有证据表明,三溴双酚 A 的致癌性是通过非遗传毒性机制产生的。考虑到新的数据,康坦姆小组认为设定每日可容忍摄入量(TDI)是适当的。根据雄性小鼠对社会交往兴趣下降的情况,确定了最低观测不良效应水平(LOAEL)为每天 0.2 毫克/千克体重(bw),并将其选定为风险特征描述的参考点。根据种间和种内变异性的默认不确定系数 100,以及从最低观测不良效应水平外推至无观测不良效应水平的系数 3,确定了每天 0.7 微克/千克体重的三溴双酚 A TDI。约 2100 项针对食品中四溴双酚 A 的分析结果被用于估算欧洲人口的膳食暴露量。鱼类和海产品、肉类和肉制品以及奶类和奶制品是造成长期膳食中溴化联苯醚暴露量的最主要因素。三溴双酚 A 的估计暴露量都低于 TDI,包括母乳喂养和配方奶喂养婴儿的估计暴露量。考虑到影响评估的不确定性,康坦姆小组以90%-95%的确定性得出结论,认为目前从膳食中摄入的三溴双酚A不会对所考虑的任何人群造成健康问题。没有足够的数据说明任何一种三溴双酚A衍生物的毒性,因此无法得出参考点,也无法与三溴双酚A进行比较,从而支持为综合风险评估目的将其归入一个评估组。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Update of the scientific opinion on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and its derivatives in food

The European Commission asked EFSA to update its 2011 risk assessment on tetrabromobisphenol A (TBBPA) and five derivatives in food. Neurotoxicity and carcinogenicity were considered as the critical effects of TBBPA in rodent studies. The available evidence indicates that the carcinogenicity of TBBPA occurs via non-genotoxic mechanisms. Taking into account the new data, the CONTAM Panel considered it appropriate to set a tolerable daily intake (TDI). Based on decreased interest in social interaction in male mice, a lowest observed adverse effect level (LOAEL) of 0.2 mg/kg body weight (bw) per day was identified and selected as the reference point for the risk characterisation. Applying the default uncertainty factor of 100 for inter- and intraspecies variability, and a factor of 3 to extrapolate from the LOAEL to NOAEL, a TDI for TBBPA of 0.7 μg/kg bw per day was established. Around 2100 analytical results for TBBPA in food were used to estimate dietary exposure for the European population. The most important contributors to the chronic dietary LB exposure to TBBPA were fish and seafood, meat and meat products and milk and dairy products. The exposure estimates to TBBPA were all below the TDI, including those estimated for breastfed and formula-fed infants. Accounting for the uncertainties affecting the assessment, the CONTAM Panel concluded with 90%–95% certainty that the current dietary exposure to TBBPA does not raise a health concern for any of the population groups considered. There were insufficient data on the toxicity of any of the TBBPA derivatives to derive reference points, or to allow a comparison with TBBPA that would support assignment to an assessment group for the purposes of combined risk assessment.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
EFSA Journal
EFSA Journal Veterinary-Veterinary (miscellaneous)
CiteScore
5.20
自引率
21.20%
发文量
422
审稿时长
5 weeks
期刊介绍: The EFSA Journal covers methods of risk assessment, reports on data collected, and risk assessments in the individual areas of plant health, plant protection products and their residues, genetically modified organisms, additives and products or substances used in animal feed, animal health and welfare, biological hazards including BSE/TSE, contaminants in the food chain, food contact materials, enzymes, flavourings and processing aids, food additives and nutrient sources added to food, dietetic products, nutrition and allergies.
期刊最新文献
Modification of the existing maximum residue levels for cycloxydim in various crops Pest categorisation of non-EU Scolytinae on non-coniferous hosts Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus velezensis RTI301 Safety evaluation of curdlan as a food additive Peer review of the pesticide risk assessment of the active substance Bacillus subtilis strain RTI477
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1