围产期亲密伴侣暴力干预措施:范围综述:系统综述。

IF 4 Q1 SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY Campbell Systematic Reviews Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.1002/cl2.1423
Olivia Mercier, Sarah Yu Fu, Rachel Filler, Alexie Leclerc, Kari Sampsel, Karine Fournier, Mark Walker, Shi Wu Wen, Katherine Muldoon
{"title":"围产期亲密伴侣暴力干预措施:范围综述:系统综述。","authors":"Olivia Mercier,&nbsp;Sarah Yu Fu,&nbsp;Rachel Filler,&nbsp;Alexie Leclerc,&nbsp;Kari Sampsel,&nbsp;Karine Fournier,&nbsp;Mark Walker,&nbsp;Shi Wu Wen,&nbsp;Katherine Muldoon","doi":"10.1002/cl2.1423","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent global health problem. IPV that occurs before pregnancy often continues during the perinatal period, resulting in ongoing violence and many adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objectives</h3>\n \n <p>This scoping review is designed to broadly capture all potential interventions for perinatal IPV and describe their core components and measured outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Search Methods</h3>\n \n <p>We conducted a search for empirical studies describing IPV interventions in the perinatal population in June 2022. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv. Hand searching of references from select articles was also performed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\n \n <p>Included studies described an intervention for those experiencing IPV during the perinatal period, including 12 months before pregnancy, while pregnant or in the 12 months post-partum. The search encompassed January 2000 to June 2022 and only peer-reviewed studies written in either English or French were included. Included interventions focused on the survivor exposed to IPV, rather than healthcare professionals administering the intervention. Interventions designed to reduce IPV revictimization or any adverse maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal health outcomes as well as social outcomes related to IPV victimization were included.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Data Collections and Analysis</h3>\n \n <p>We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Main Results</h3>\n \n <p>In total, 10,079 titles and abstracts were screened and 226 proceeded to full text screening. A total of 67 studies included perinatal IPV interventions and were included in the final sample. These studies included a total of 27,327 participants. Included studies originated from 19 countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 43). Most studies were of moderate or low quality. Interventions included home visitation, educational modules, counseling, and cash transfer programs and occurred primarily in community obstetrician and gynecologist clinics, hospitals, or in participants' homes. Most interventions focused on reducing revictimization of IPV (<i>n</i> = 38), improving survivor knowledge or acceptance of violence, knowledge of community resources, and actions to reduce violence (<i>n</i> = 28), and improving maternal mental health outcomes (<i>n</i> = 26). Few studies evaluated the effect of perinatal IPV interventions on obstetrical, neonatal or child health outcomes.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Authors' Conclusion(s)</h3>\n \n <p>The majority of intervention studies for perinatal IPV focus on reducing revictimization and improving mental health outcomes, very few included obstetrical, neonatal, and other physical health outcomes. Future interventions should place a larger emphasis on targeting maternal and neonatal outcomes to have the largest possible impact on the lives and families of IPV survivors and their infants.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":36698,"journal":{"name":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247475/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review: A systematic review\",\"authors\":\"Olivia Mercier,&nbsp;Sarah Yu Fu,&nbsp;Rachel Filler,&nbsp;Alexie Leclerc,&nbsp;Kari Sampsel,&nbsp;Karine Fournier,&nbsp;Mark Walker,&nbsp;Shi Wu Wen,&nbsp;Katherine Muldoon\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cl2.1423\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent global health problem. IPV that occurs before pregnancy often continues during the perinatal period, resulting in ongoing violence and many adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objectives</h3>\\n \\n <p>This scoping review is designed to broadly capture all potential interventions for perinatal IPV and describe their core components and measured outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Search Methods</h3>\\n \\n <p>We conducted a search for empirical studies describing IPV interventions in the perinatal population in June 2022. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index &amp; Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv. Hand searching of references from select articles was also performed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Selection Criteria</h3>\\n \\n <p>Included studies described an intervention for those experiencing IPV during the perinatal period, including 12 months before pregnancy, while pregnant or in the 12 months post-partum. The search encompassed January 2000 to June 2022 and only peer-reviewed studies written in either English or French were included. Included interventions focused on the survivor exposed to IPV, rather than healthcare professionals administering the intervention. Interventions designed to reduce IPV revictimization or any adverse maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal health outcomes as well as social outcomes related to IPV victimization were included.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Data Collections and Analysis</h3>\\n \\n <p>We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Main Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>In total, 10,079 titles and abstracts were screened and 226 proceeded to full text screening. A total of 67 studies included perinatal IPV interventions and were included in the final sample. These studies included a total of 27,327 participants. Included studies originated from 19 countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials (<i>n</i> = 43). Most studies were of moderate or low quality. Interventions included home visitation, educational modules, counseling, and cash transfer programs and occurred primarily in community obstetrician and gynecologist clinics, hospitals, or in participants' homes. Most interventions focused on reducing revictimization of IPV (<i>n</i> = 38), improving survivor knowledge or acceptance of violence, knowledge of community resources, and actions to reduce violence (<i>n</i> = 28), and improving maternal mental health outcomes (<i>n</i> = 26). Few studies evaluated the effect of perinatal IPV interventions on obstetrical, neonatal or child health outcomes.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Authors' Conclusion(s)</h3>\\n \\n <p>The majority of intervention studies for perinatal IPV focus on reducing revictimization and improving mental health outcomes, very few included obstetrical, neonatal, and other physical health outcomes. Future interventions should place a larger emphasis on targeting maternal and neonatal outcomes to have the largest possible impact on the lives and families of IPV survivors and their infants.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":36698,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11247475/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campbell Systematic Reviews\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1423\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campbell Systematic Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cl2.1423","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"SOCIAL SCIENCES, INTERDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:亲密伴侣暴力(IPV)是一个普遍存在的全球性健康问题。孕前发生的 IPV 通常会在围产期持续存在,导致暴力不断发生,并对孕产妇、产科和新生儿造成许多不利影响:本范围综述旨在广泛收集针对围产期 IPV 的所有潜在干预措施,并描述其核心内容和测量结果:我们检索了 2022 年 6 月描述围产期 IPV 干预措施的实证研究。检索范围包括 MEDLINE、EMBASE、PsycInfo、CINAHL、Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials、Web of Science、Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts、ClinicalTrials.gov 和 MedRxiv。此外,还对部分文章的参考文献进行了人工检索:所纳入的研究描述了针对围产期(包括怀孕前 12 个月、怀孕期间或产后 12 个月)内遭受 IPV 者的干预措施。检索时间为 2000 年 1 月至 2022 年 6 月,仅纳入以英语或法语撰写的同行评审研究。所纳入的干预措施主要针对遭受 IPV 的幸存者,而非实施干预措施的医护人员。数据收集与分析:我们采用了坎贝尔合作组织所要求的标准方法程序:共筛选了 10,079 篇标题和摘要,其中 226 篇进入全文筛选。共有 67 项研究包含围产期 IPV 干预措施,并被纳入最终样本。这些研究共纳入 27,327 名参与者。纳入的研究来自 19 个国家,大部分为随机对照试验(n = 43)。大多数研究的质量为中等或较低。干预措施包括家访、教育模块、咨询和现金转移计划,主要在社区妇产科诊所、医院或参与者家中进行。大多数干预措施侧重于减少 IPV 的再次伤害(38 例)、提高幸存者对暴力的认识或接受程度、对社区资源的了解以及减少暴力的行动(28 例),以及改善孕产妇的心理健康结果(26 例)。很少有研究评估了围产期 IPV 干预措施对产科、新生儿或儿童健康结果的影响:作者的结论:大多数针对围产期 IPV 的干预研究侧重于减少再次受害和改善心理健康结果,很少有研究包括产科、新生儿和其他身体健康结果。未来的干预措施应更加重视针对产妇和新生儿的结果,以便对 IPV 幸存者及其婴儿的生活和家庭产生尽可能大的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Interventions for intimate partner violence during the perinatal period: A scoping review: A systematic review

Background

Intimate partner violence (IPV) is a prevalent global health problem. IPV that occurs before pregnancy often continues during the perinatal period, resulting in ongoing violence and many adverse maternal, obstetrical, and neonatal outcomes.

Objectives

This scoping review is designed to broadly capture all potential interventions for perinatal IPV and describe their core components and measured outcomes.

Search Methods

We conducted a search for empirical studies describing IPV interventions in the perinatal population in June 2022. The search was conducted in MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycInfo, CINAHL, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Web of Science, Applied Social Sciences Index & Abstracts, ClinicalTrials.gov and MedRxiv. Hand searching of references from select articles was also performed.

Selection Criteria

Included studies described an intervention for those experiencing IPV during the perinatal period, including 12 months before pregnancy, while pregnant or in the 12 months post-partum. The search encompassed January 2000 to June 2022 and only peer-reviewed studies written in either English or French were included. Included interventions focused on the survivor exposed to IPV, rather than healthcare professionals administering the intervention. Interventions designed to reduce IPV revictimization or any adverse maternal, obstetrical, or neonatal health outcomes as well as social outcomes related to IPV victimization were included.

Data Collections and Analysis

We used standard methodological procedures expected by The Campbell Collaboration.

Main Results

In total, 10,079 titles and abstracts were screened and 226 proceeded to full text screening. A total of 67 studies included perinatal IPV interventions and were included in the final sample. These studies included a total of 27,327 participants. Included studies originated from 19 countries, and the majority were randomized controlled trials (n = 43). Most studies were of moderate or low quality. Interventions included home visitation, educational modules, counseling, and cash transfer programs and occurred primarily in community obstetrician and gynecologist clinics, hospitals, or in participants' homes. Most interventions focused on reducing revictimization of IPV (n = 38), improving survivor knowledge or acceptance of violence, knowledge of community resources, and actions to reduce violence (n = 28), and improving maternal mental health outcomes (n = 26). Few studies evaluated the effect of perinatal IPV interventions on obstetrical, neonatal or child health outcomes.

Authors' Conclusion(s)

The majority of intervention studies for perinatal IPV focus on reducing revictimization and improving mental health outcomes, very few included obstetrical, neonatal, and other physical health outcomes. Future interventions should place a larger emphasis on targeting maternal and neonatal outcomes to have the largest possible impact on the lives and families of IPV survivors and their infants.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Campbell Systematic Reviews
Campbell Systematic Reviews Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
5.50
自引率
21.90%
发文量
80
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
PROTOCOL: Effectiveness of social accountability interventions in low- and middle-income countries: An evidence and gap map PROTOCOL: Risk and protective factors for child sexual abuse and interventions against child sexual abuse: An umbrella review PROTOCOL: Is the CEO/employee pay ratio related to firm performance in publicly traded companies? New search guidance for Campbell systematic reviews PROTOCOL: The association between adverse childhood experiences and employment outcomes: Protocol for a systematic review
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1