Gordana Manevska-Tasevska , Vivian Wei Huang , Zhen Chen , Ortrud Jäck , Nasir Adam , Thanh Mai Ha , Martin Weih , Helena Hansson
{"title":"瑞典采用谷物-豆类间作方法的经济效益","authors":"Gordana Manevska-Tasevska , Vivian Wei Huang , Zhen Chen , Ortrud Jäck , Nasir Adam , Thanh Mai Ha , Martin Weih , Helena Hansson","doi":"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104064","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>The need for sustainable and resilient farming practices is clearly communicated by the scholars and the European Union policy strategies. The low interest in adopting the practice due to the uncertainties and the variability in the economic outcomes across various intercropping types calls for research attention. In this respect, research is needed to identifying specific intercropping practices that lead to improved farm-level economic outcomes and resilience.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>This study investigates consequences of intercropping adoption on the farm economic outcomes, in the context of achieving economic resilience. Specific objectives are to assess the effect of i) adopting intercropping on the economic outcomes; ii) production adjustments on the economic resilience of the intercropping practices, both in comparison to conventional mono-cropped agriculture.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The analysis is conducted by using a stochastic partial budgeting model. We use Swedish agriculture as an empirical basis for our study and model two baseline cereal monocropping scenarios and two corresponding alternative (strip and mixed) cereal-legume intercropping scenarios. This is to examine net changes and risk characteristics resulting from the adaptation from monocropping to intercropping production practices. Estimates of net changes and the respective risk characteristics are integrated in an economic resilience assessment for the intercropping practices.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Results reveal that the net economic benefit change from adopting differs across the intercropping alternatives. Prices of the monocropped and the intercropped products of both intercropping alternatives and the use of N fertilizer for the strip intercropping alternative are the most influential factors in determining the adaptability capacity.</p></div><div><h3>CONTRIBUTION</h3><p>This study provides a novel approach that contributes to the literature via quantifying economic resilience capacities of hypothetical technology adoption. The paper presents unique results on the economic resilience of adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in a Nordic context, giving agriculture in Nordic regions shares common challenges such as short growing season and cold temperature. The results offer valuable insights for extension services in guiding farmers to choose appropriate intercropping practices based on the production possibilities and market needs. Policy implications targeting the adoption of cereal-legume intercropping adoption are discussed.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":7730,"journal":{"name":"Agricultural Systems","volume":"220 ","pages":"Article 104064"},"PeriodicalIF":6.1000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142/pdfft?md5=00516e678c49e6b61fdecf122b354d36&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002142-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Economic outcomes from adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in Sweden\",\"authors\":\"Gordana Manevska-Tasevska , Vivian Wei Huang , Zhen Chen , Ortrud Jäck , Nasir Adam , Thanh Mai Ha , Martin Weih , Helena Hansson\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.agsy.2024.104064\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>CONTEXT</h3><p>The need for sustainable and resilient farming practices is clearly communicated by the scholars and the European Union policy strategies. The low interest in adopting the practice due to the uncertainties and the variability in the economic outcomes across various intercropping types calls for research attention. In this respect, research is needed to identifying specific intercropping practices that lead to improved farm-level economic outcomes and resilience.</p></div><div><h3>OBJECTIVES</h3><p>This study investigates consequences of intercropping adoption on the farm economic outcomes, in the context of achieving economic resilience. Specific objectives are to assess the effect of i) adopting intercropping on the economic outcomes; ii) production adjustments on the economic resilience of the intercropping practices, both in comparison to conventional mono-cropped agriculture.</p></div><div><h3>METHODS</h3><p>The analysis is conducted by using a stochastic partial budgeting model. We use Swedish agriculture as an empirical basis for our study and model two baseline cereal monocropping scenarios and two corresponding alternative (strip and mixed) cereal-legume intercropping scenarios. This is to examine net changes and risk characteristics resulting from the adaptation from monocropping to intercropping production practices. Estimates of net changes and the respective risk characteristics are integrated in an economic resilience assessment for the intercropping practices.</p></div><div><h3>RESULTS</h3><p>Results reveal that the net economic benefit change from adopting differs across the intercropping alternatives. Prices of the monocropped and the intercropped products of both intercropping alternatives and the use of N fertilizer for the strip intercropping alternative are the most influential factors in determining the adaptability capacity.</p></div><div><h3>CONTRIBUTION</h3><p>This study provides a novel approach that contributes to the literature via quantifying economic resilience capacities of hypothetical technology adoption. The paper presents unique results on the economic resilience of adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in a Nordic context, giving agriculture in Nordic regions shares common challenges such as short growing season and cold temperature. The results offer valuable insights for extension services in guiding farmers to choose appropriate intercropping practices based on the production possibilities and market needs. Policy implications targeting the adoption of cereal-legume intercropping adoption are discussed.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":7730,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"volume\":\"220 \",\"pages\":\"Article 104064\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.1000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142/pdfft?md5=00516e678c49e6b61fdecf122b354d36&pid=1-s2.0-S0308521X24002142-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Agricultural Systems\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Agricultural Systems","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308521X24002142","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Economic outcomes from adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in Sweden
CONTEXT
The need for sustainable and resilient farming practices is clearly communicated by the scholars and the European Union policy strategies. The low interest in adopting the practice due to the uncertainties and the variability in the economic outcomes across various intercropping types calls for research attention. In this respect, research is needed to identifying specific intercropping practices that lead to improved farm-level economic outcomes and resilience.
OBJECTIVES
This study investigates consequences of intercropping adoption on the farm economic outcomes, in the context of achieving economic resilience. Specific objectives are to assess the effect of i) adopting intercropping on the economic outcomes; ii) production adjustments on the economic resilience of the intercropping practices, both in comparison to conventional mono-cropped agriculture.
METHODS
The analysis is conducted by using a stochastic partial budgeting model. We use Swedish agriculture as an empirical basis for our study and model two baseline cereal monocropping scenarios and two corresponding alternative (strip and mixed) cereal-legume intercropping scenarios. This is to examine net changes and risk characteristics resulting from the adaptation from monocropping to intercropping production practices. Estimates of net changes and the respective risk characteristics are integrated in an economic resilience assessment for the intercropping practices.
RESULTS
Results reveal that the net economic benefit change from adopting differs across the intercropping alternatives. Prices of the monocropped and the intercropped products of both intercropping alternatives and the use of N fertilizer for the strip intercropping alternative are the most influential factors in determining the adaptability capacity.
CONTRIBUTION
This study provides a novel approach that contributes to the literature via quantifying economic resilience capacities of hypothetical technology adoption. The paper presents unique results on the economic resilience of adopting cereal-legume intercropping practices in a Nordic context, giving agriculture in Nordic regions shares common challenges such as short growing season and cold temperature. The results offer valuable insights for extension services in guiding farmers to choose appropriate intercropping practices based on the production possibilities and market needs. Policy implications targeting the adoption of cereal-legume intercropping adoption are discussed.
期刊介绍:
Agricultural Systems is an international journal that deals with interactions - among the components of agricultural systems, among hierarchical levels of agricultural systems, between agricultural and other land use systems, and between agricultural systems and their natural, social and economic environments.
The scope includes the development and application of systems analysis methodologies in the following areas:
Systems approaches in the sustainable intensification of agriculture; pathways for sustainable intensification; crop-livestock integration; farm-level resource allocation; quantification of benefits and trade-offs at farm to landscape levels; integrative, participatory and dynamic modelling approaches for qualitative and quantitative assessments of agricultural systems and decision making;
The interactions between agricultural and non-agricultural landscapes; the multiple services of agricultural systems; food security and the environment;
Global change and adaptation science; transformational adaptations as driven by changes in climate, policy, values and attitudes influencing the design of farming systems;
Development and application of farming systems design tools and methods for impact, scenario and case study analysis; managing the complexities of dynamic agricultural systems; innovation systems and multi stakeholder arrangements that support or promote change and (or) inform policy decisions.