在选定同行的基础上,通过数据包络分析(DEA)设定基准,改进规划工作

IF 6.2 2区 经济学 Q1 ECONOMICS Socio-economic Planning Sciences Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1016/j.seps.2024.102020
Fernando Borrás , José L. Ruiz , Inmaculada Sirvent
{"title":"在选定同行的基础上,通过数据包络分析(DEA)设定基准,改进规划工作","authors":"Fernando Borrás ,&nbsp;José L. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Sirvent","doi":"10.1016/j.seps.2024.102020","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Incorporating preferences on suitable peers into benchmarking analyses may ensure the setting of appropriate targets, which enable designing plans for improving performance that are aligned with management. This paper deals with target setting in situations where decision makers (DMs) have previously made a selection of peer candidates for the benchmarking of a given organization. A first approach is developed within the framework of conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which is the technology mostly used in non-parametric frontier analysis. It provides targets from reference sets consisting of peer candidates that span a face of the strong efficient frontier of the production possibility set (PPS). These targets result from solving a DEA-like model, thus preventing from the need to identify all of the maximal efficient faces (MEFs) of the DEA frontier. We also propose a second approach where the convexity in DEA is somehow relaxed to allow additionally for reference sets consisting of candidates that are Pareto-efficient, provided that their convex hull is not dominated by other units. In that sense, the targets found can be seen as representing best practices. This approach broadens the range of alternatives when planning improvements, and may eventually provide closer targets.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":22033,"journal":{"name":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","volume":"95 ","pages":"Article 102020"},"PeriodicalIF":6.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002192/pdfft?md5=23a32d12d6aaa47b1899c5011b183e86&pid=1-s2.0-S0038012124002192-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Planning improvements through data envelopment analysis (DEA) benchmarking based on a selection of peers\",\"authors\":\"Fernando Borrás ,&nbsp;José L. Ruiz ,&nbsp;Inmaculada Sirvent\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.seps.2024.102020\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Incorporating preferences on suitable peers into benchmarking analyses may ensure the setting of appropriate targets, which enable designing plans for improving performance that are aligned with management. This paper deals with target setting in situations where decision makers (DMs) have previously made a selection of peer candidates for the benchmarking of a given organization. A first approach is developed within the framework of conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which is the technology mostly used in non-parametric frontier analysis. It provides targets from reference sets consisting of peer candidates that span a face of the strong efficient frontier of the production possibility set (PPS). These targets result from solving a DEA-like model, thus preventing from the need to identify all of the maximal efficient faces (MEFs) of the DEA frontier. We also propose a second approach where the convexity in DEA is somehow relaxed to allow additionally for reference sets consisting of candidates that are Pareto-efficient, provided that their convex hull is not dominated by other units. In that sense, the targets found can be seen as representing best practices. This approach broadens the range of alternatives when planning improvements, and may eventually provide closer targets.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":22033,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Socio-economic Planning Sciences\",\"volume\":\"95 \",\"pages\":\"Article 102020\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":6.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002192/pdfft?md5=23a32d12d6aaa47b1899c5011b183e86&pid=1-s2.0-S0038012124002192-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Socio-economic Planning Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"96\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002192\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"经济学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ECONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Socio-economic Planning Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"96","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0038012124002192","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"经济学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

将对合适同行的偏好纳入基准分析可确保设定适当的目标,从而设计出与管理层一致的绩效改进计划。本文论述了在决策者(DMs)已经为特定组织的标杆分析选择了同行候选者的情况下的目标设定问题。第一种方法是在传统的数据包络分析(DEA)框架内开发的,该技术主要用于非参数前沿分析。它从由同行候选者组成的参考集中提供目标,这些候选者跨越了生产可能性集(PPS)的强有效前沿的一个面。这些目标是通过求解类似于 DEA 的模型得出的,因此无需识别 DEA 边界的所有最大有效面 (MEF)。我们还提出了第二种方法,即在某种程度上放宽 DEA 中的凸性,以额外允许由具有帕累托效率的候选方案组成的参考集,前提是它们的凸壳不被其他单元所支配。从这个意义上说,找到的目标可以被视为代表最佳实践。这种方法拓宽了计划改进时的备选方案范围,并可能最终提供更接近的目标。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Planning improvements through data envelopment analysis (DEA) benchmarking based on a selection of peers

Incorporating preferences on suitable peers into benchmarking analyses may ensure the setting of appropriate targets, which enable designing plans for improving performance that are aligned with management. This paper deals with target setting in situations where decision makers (DMs) have previously made a selection of peer candidates for the benchmarking of a given organization. A first approach is developed within the framework of conventional Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA), which is the technology mostly used in non-parametric frontier analysis. It provides targets from reference sets consisting of peer candidates that span a face of the strong efficient frontier of the production possibility set (PPS). These targets result from solving a DEA-like model, thus preventing from the need to identify all of the maximal efficient faces (MEFs) of the DEA frontier. We also propose a second approach where the convexity in DEA is somehow relaxed to allow additionally for reference sets consisting of candidates that are Pareto-efficient, provided that their convex hull is not dominated by other units. In that sense, the targets found can be seen as representing best practices. This approach broadens the range of alternatives when planning improvements, and may eventually provide closer targets.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Socio-economic Planning Sciences
Socio-economic Planning Sciences OPERATIONS RESEARCH & MANAGEMENT SCIENCE-
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
13.10%
发文量
294
审稿时长
58 days
期刊介绍: Studies directed toward the more effective utilization of existing resources, e.g. mathematical programming models of health care delivery systems with relevance to more effective program design; systems analysis of fire outbreaks and its relevance to the location of fire stations; statistical analysis of the efficiency of a developing country economy or industry. Studies relating to the interaction of various segments of society and technology, e.g. the effects of government health policies on the utilization and design of hospital facilities; the relationship between housing density and the demands on public transportation or other service facilities: patterns and implications of urban development and air or water pollution. Studies devoted to the anticipations of and response to future needs for social, health and other human services, e.g. the relationship between industrial growth and the development of educational resources in affected areas; investigation of future demands for material and child health resources in a developing country; design of effective recycling in an urban setting.
期刊最新文献
Low-carbon route optimization model for multimodal freight transport considering value and time attributes Measurement and comparison of different dimensions of renewable energy policy implementation in the agricultural sector A Kansei engineering-based decision-making method for offline medical service quality evaluation with multidimensional attributes Investigating water sustainability towards indicators: An empirical illustration using country-level data What about QR codes on wine bottles? A statistical analysis of technology's influence on purchase decisions among Italian wine consumers
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1