ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期预后:直接入院与医院间转院的比较研究--来自英国单中心经验的启示

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1155/2024/7112494
Tarek Abdeldayem, Ashan Gunarathne
{"title":"ST段抬高型心肌梗死患者的长期预后:直接入院与医院间转院的比较研究--来自英国单中心经验的启示","authors":"Tarek Abdeldayem,&nbsp;Ashan Gunarathne","doi":"10.1155/2024/7112494","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Delayed reperfusion leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Secular trends in the impact of interhospital transfers (IT) on long-term mortality in the United Kingdom (UK) have not been previously investigated. We analyzed the impact of IT on 5-year mortality in STEMI patients admitted to a tertiary care center in the UK (East Midlands North). <i>Methods</i>. Data of STEMI patients admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust from 2011 to 2016 were acquired from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research dataset (NICOR) and then combined with local patient-level data and mortality data from National Statistics. The baseline characteristics and mortality data of the interhospital transfer (IT) group were compared to those of a gender and age-matched direct admission (DA) group. <i>Results</i>. Of the total cohort (<i>N</i> = 2386), 29.9% of patients were admitted to the PPCI center via the interhospital transfer (IT) route. Cardiovascular risk profiles in both DA and IT groups were comparable. Five-year Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis revealed better survival in the direct admission group (83% vs. 77.3%; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, increased mortality was associated with severe left ventricular impairment (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.9–7.6), the presence of cardiogenic shock (HR 3.6 (2.7–4.8)), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.56 (1.4–4.5)), smoking (HR 1.45 (1.1–1.8)), male gender (HR 1.7 (1.4–2.01)), and diabetes (HR 1.4 (1.07–1.8)). The radial access and call-to-balloon time less than 120 minutes were also associated with lower mortality (HR 0.52 (0.43–0.63): HR 0.75 (0.61–0.92)). <i>Conclusion</i>. Despite advancements in communication, technology, patient education, transportation systems, and guidelines within the UK’s NHS over the last decade, the delays incurred by IT for STEMI patients remain substantial and are associated with a poor prognosis.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":"2024 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7112494","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Comparative Study of Direct Admissions versus Interhospital Transfers—Insights from a Single-Center Experience in the United Kingdom\",\"authors\":\"Tarek Abdeldayem,&nbsp;Ashan Gunarathne\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/7112494\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Delayed reperfusion leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Secular trends in the impact of interhospital transfers (IT) on long-term mortality in the United Kingdom (UK) have not been previously investigated. We analyzed the impact of IT on 5-year mortality in STEMI patients admitted to a tertiary care center in the UK (East Midlands North). <i>Methods</i>. Data of STEMI patients admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust from 2011 to 2016 were acquired from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research dataset (NICOR) and then combined with local patient-level data and mortality data from National Statistics. The baseline characteristics and mortality data of the interhospital transfer (IT) group were compared to those of a gender and age-matched direct admission (DA) group. <i>Results</i>. Of the total cohort (<i>N</i> = 2386), 29.9% of patients were admitted to the PPCI center via the interhospital transfer (IT) route. Cardiovascular risk profiles in both DA and IT groups were comparable. Five-year Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis revealed better survival in the direct admission group (83% vs. 77.3%; <i>p</i> ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, increased mortality was associated with severe left ventricular impairment (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.9–7.6), the presence of cardiogenic shock (HR 3.6 (2.7–4.8)), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.56 (1.4–4.5)), smoking (HR 1.45 (1.1–1.8)), male gender (HR 1.7 (1.4–2.01)), and diabetes (HR 1.4 (1.07–1.8)). The radial access and call-to-balloon time less than 120 minutes were also associated with lower mortality (HR 0.52 (0.43–0.63): HR 0.75 (0.61–0.92)). <i>Conclusion</i>. Despite advancements in communication, technology, patient education, transportation systems, and guidelines within the UK’s NHS over the last decade, the delays incurred by IT for STEMI patients remain substantial and are associated with a poor prognosis.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":\"2024 1\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/7112494\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7112494\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/7112494","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。原发性经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PPCI)是 ST 段抬高型心肌梗死(STEMI)患者的首选治疗方法。延迟再灌注会增加发病率和死亡率。在英国,院间转运(IT)对长期死亡率影响的长期趋势尚未得到研究。我们分析了英国一家三级医疗中心(东米德兰兹北部)收治的 STEMI 患者院间转运对 5 年死亡率的影响。研究方法诺丁汉大学医院 NHS 信托基金会 2011 年至 2016 年收治的 STEMI 患者数据来自国家心血管结果研究所数据集(NICOR),然后与当地患者水平数据和国家统计数据中的死亡率数据相结合。将医院间转运(IT)组的基线特征和死亡率数据与性别和年龄匹配的直接入院(DA)组的基线特征和死亡率数据进行了比较。研究结果在所有组群(N = 2386)中,29.9%的患者是通过医院间转运(IT)途径入住PPCI中心的。DA组和IT组的心血管风险情况相当。五年卡普兰-米尔(KM)生存率分析显示,直接入院组的生存率更高(83% 对 77.3%;P ≤ 0.001)。在多变量分析中,死亡率增加与以下因素有关:严重左心室功能损害(HR 4.7,95% CI 2.9-7.6)、心源性休克(HR 3.6(2.7-4.8))、慢性肾病(HR 2.56(1.4-4.5))、吸烟(HR 1.45(1.1-1.8))、男性(HR 1.7(1.4-2.01))和糖尿病(HR 1.4(1.07-1.8))。桡动脉入路和呼叫至气球时间少于 120 分钟也与较低的死亡率有关(HR 0.52 (0.43-0.63):HR 0.75 (0.61-0.92))。结论尽管过去十年英国国家医疗服务体系在沟通、技术、患者教育、运输系统和指南方面取得了进步,但治疗 STEMI 患者的信息技术仍存在严重延误,且与不良预后有关。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Long-Term Outcomes in Patients with ST-Elevation Myocardial Infarction: A Comparative Study of Direct Admissions versus Interhospital Transfers—Insights from a Single-Center Experience in the United Kingdom

Background. Primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PPCI) is the treatment of choice for patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Delayed reperfusion leads to increased morbidity and mortality. Secular trends in the impact of interhospital transfers (IT) on long-term mortality in the United Kingdom (UK) have not been previously investigated. We analyzed the impact of IT on 5-year mortality in STEMI patients admitted to a tertiary care center in the UK (East Midlands North). Methods. Data of STEMI patients admitted to Nottingham University Hospitals NHS Trust from 2011 to 2016 were acquired from the National Institute for Cardiovascular Outcomes Research dataset (NICOR) and then combined with local patient-level data and mortality data from National Statistics. The baseline characteristics and mortality data of the interhospital transfer (IT) group were compared to those of a gender and age-matched direct admission (DA) group. Results. Of the total cohort (N = 2386), 29.9% of patients were admitted to the PPCI center via the interhospital transfer (IT) route. Cardiovascular risk profiles in both DA and IT groups were comparable. Five-year Kaplan–Meier (KM) survival analysis revealed better survival in the direct admission group (83% vs. 77.3%; p ≤ 0.001). In multivariate analysis, increased mortality was associated with severe left ventricular impairment (HR 4.7, 95% CI 2.9–7.6), the presence of cardiogenic shock (HR 3.6 (2.7–4.8)), chronic kidney disease (HR 2.56 (1.4–4.5)), smoking (HR 1.45 (1.1–1.8)), male gender (HR 1.7 (1.4–2.01)), and diabetes (HR 1.4 (1.07–1.8)). The radial access and call-to-balloon time less than 120 minutes were also associated with lower mortality (HR 0.52 (0.43–0.63): HR 0.75 (0.61–0.92)). Conclusion. Despite advancements in communication, technology, patient education, transportation systems, and guidelines within the UK’s NHS over the last decade, the delays incurred by IT for STEMI patients remain substantial and are associated with a poor prognosis.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
High Prevalence of Unrecorded Stage 3 Chronic Kidney Disease in Australia, Brazil, Canada, England, and Spain: The Multinational, Observational REVEAL-CKD Study Influencing Factors for Depression and Depression Aggravation in Hospitalized Elderly Patients With Chronic Heart Failure Blood Urea Nitrogen to Albumin Ratio Was Associated With Mortality in Critically Ill Septic Patients: A Multicenter Retrospective Propensity–Adjusted Analysis Affordability of Original and Generic Antihypertensive Drugs Under the National Centralized Drug Procurement Policy and Basic Medical Insurance System: A Cross-Sectional Survey in Xi’an, China Guidelines for Returning to Dance Following Concussion: Adaptations From Sport Concussion Literature
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1