继父母与亲生父母对成年子女支持的种族和民族差异

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2024-04-26 DOI:10.1111/jomf.12994
Corrine E. Wiborg MA, Jenjira J. Yahirun PhD
{"title":"继父母与亲生父母对成年子女支持的种族和民族差异","authors":"Corrine E. Wiborg MA,&nbsp;Jenjira J. Yahirun PhD","doi":"10.1111/jomf.12994","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n \n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Objective</h3>\n \n <p>This brief report examines differences in step- versus biological family support between White, Black, and Hispanic families in the United States.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Background</h3>\n \n <p>The increasing share of stepfamilies reflects a potential shift in family relationships. Although research finds that stepfamilies are generally less likely to engage in instrumental support than biological families, recent work suggests that the relationship between family structure and family behaviors may vary across racial/ethnic groups.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Method</h3>\n \n <p>Using data from the 2015 to 2017 Add Health Parent Study, this report examines racial/ethnic differences in step- versus biological family support between parents and adult children. Specifically, parents' likelihood of and hours of providing instrumental support to adult children are assessed.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Results</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from this report indicate that for Black and White families, stepfamilies are less likely to provide instrumental support to their adult children than biological families. Among Hispanic families, however, stepfamilies are not more or less likely to provide support than biological families. When hours of instrumental support are examined, White stepfamilies provide fewer hours of support than biological families, whereas no difference is found for Black or Hispanic families.</p>\n </section>\n \n <section>\n \n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\n \n <p>Findings from this study contribute to broader work that calls for a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of family structure across social groups. Future research should consider applying within-race/ethnicity analyses when examining the association between family structure and intergenerational support.</p>\n </section>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":"86 4","pages":"1119-1131"},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.12994","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Race and ethnic differences in step- versus biological parent support to adult children\",\"authors\":\"Corrine E. Wiborg MA,&nbsp;Jenjira J. Yahirun PhD\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jomf.12994\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n \\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Objective</h3>\\n \\n <p>This brief report examines differences in step- versus biological family support between White, Black, and Hispanic families in the United States.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Background</h3>\\n \\n <p>The increasing share of stepfamilies reflects a potential shift in family relationships. Although research finds that stepfamilies are generally less likely to engage in instrumental support than biological families, recent work suggests that the relationship between family structure and family behaviors may vary across racial/ethnic groups.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Method</h3>\\n \\n <p>Using data from the 2015 to 2017 Add Health Parent Study, this report examines racial/ethnic differences in step- versus biological family support between parents and adult children. Specifically, parents' likelihood of and hours of providing instrumental support to adult children are assessed.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Results</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings from this report indicate that for Black and White families, stepfamilies are less likely to provide instrumental support to their adult children than biological families. Among Hispanic families, however, stepfamilies are not more or less likely to provide support than biological families. When hours of instrumental support are examined, White stepfamilies provide fewer hours of support than biological families, whereas no difference is found for Black or Hispanic families.</p>\\n </section>\\n \\n <section>\\n \\n <h3> Conclusion</h3>\\n \\n <p>Findings from this study contribute to broader work that calls for a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of family structure across social groups. Future research should consider applying within-race/ethnicity analyses when examining the association between family structure and intergenerational support.</p>\\n </section>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":48440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"volume\":\"86 4\",\"pages\":\"1119-1131\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-26\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1111/jomf.12994\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12994\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jomf.12994","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本简要报告探讨了美国白人家庭、黑人家庭和西班牙裔家庭在继室与亲生家庭支持方面的差异。 背景 继家庭比例的增加反映了家庭关系的潜在变化。尽管研究发现,与亲生家庭相比,继家庭一般不太可能参与工具性支持,但最近的研究表明,家庭结构与家庭行为之间的关系可能因种族/族裔群体而异。 方法 本报告利用 2015 年至 2017 年 "添加健康父母研究"(Add Health Parent Study)的数据,研究了父母与成年子女之间在继室与亲生家庭支持方面的种族/民族差异。具体而言,报告评估了父母为成年子女提供工具性支持的可能性和时长。 结果 本报告的研究结果表明,对于黑人和白人家庭来说,与亲生家庭相比,继子女家庭为其成年子女提供工具性支持的可能性较小。然而,在西班牙裔家庭中,与亲生家庭相比,继父家庭提供支持的可能性并不比亲生家庭高或低。在考察提供工具性支持的小时数时,白人继家庭提供支持的小时数少于亲生家庭,而黑人或西班牙裔家庭则没有发现差异。 结论 本研究的结果有助于更广泛的工作,即呼吁对家庭结构在不同社会群体中的不同影响进行更细致的了解。未来的研究在考察家庭结构与代际支持之间的关联时,应考虑应用种族/族裔内部分析。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Race and ethnic differences in step- versus biological parent support to adult children

Objective

This brief report examines differences in step- versus biological family support between White, Black, and Hispanic families in the United States.

Background

The increasing share of stepfamilies reflects a potential shift in family relationships. Although research finds that stepfamilies are generally less likely to engage in instrumental support than biological families, recent work suggests that the relationship between family structure and family behaviors may vary across racial/ethnic groups.

Method

Using data from the 2015 to 2017 Add Health Parent Study, this report examines racial/ethnic differences in step- versus biological family support between parents and adult children. Specifically, parents' likelihood of and hours of providing instrumental support to adult children are assessed.

Results

Findings from this report indicate that for Black and White families, stepfamilies are less likely to provide instrumental support to their adult children than biological families. Among Hispanic families, however, stepfamilies are not more or less likely to provide support than biological families. When hours of instrumental support are examined, White stepfamilies provide fewer hours of support than biological families, whereas no difference is found for Black or Hispanic families.

Conclusion

Findings from this study contribute to broader work that calls for a more nuanced understanding of the differential effects of family structure across social groups. Future research should consider applying within-race/ethnicity analyses when examining the association between family structure and intergenerational support.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods The ties that bind: Questions for studying families in neighborhood contexts Issue Information Looking beyond marital status: What we can learn from relationship status measures
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1