ARDSFlag:一种 NLP/机器学习算法,用于可视化和检测高概率 ARDS 入院病例,与提供者识别和账单代码无关。

IF 3.3 3区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL INFORMATICS BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1186/s12911-024-02573-5
Amir Gandomi, Phil Wu, Daniel R Clement, Jinyan Xing, Rachel Aviv, Matthew Federbush, Zhiyong Yuan, Yajun Jing, Guangyao Wei, Negin Hajizadeh
{"title":"ARDSFlag:一种 NLP/机器学习算法,用于可视化和检测高概率 ARDS 入院病例,与提供者识别和账单代码无关。","authors":"Amir Gandomi, Phil Wu, Daniel R Clement, Jinyan Xing, Rachel Aviv, Matthew Federbush, Zhiyong Yuan, Yajun Jing, Guangyao Wei, Negin Hajizadeh","doi":"10.1186/s12911-024-02573-5","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the significance and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its detection remains highly variable and inconsistent. In this work, we aim to develop an algorithm (ARDSFlag) to automate the diagnosis of ARDS based on the Berlin definition. We also aim to develop a visualization tool that helps clinicians efficiently assess ARDS criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ARDSFlag applies machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to evaluate Berlin criteria by incorporating structured and unstructured data in an electronic health record (EHR) system. The study cohort includes 19,534 ICU admissions in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The output is the ARDS diagnosis, onset time, and severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARDSFlag includes separate text classifiers trained using large training sets to find evidence of bilateral infiltrates in radiology reports (accuracy of 91.9%±0.5%) and heart failure/fluid overload in radiology reports (accuracy 86.1%±0.5%) and echocardiogram notes (accuracy 98.4%±0.3%). A test set of 300 cases, which was blindly and independently labeled for ARDS by two groups of clinicians, shows that ARDSFlag generates an overall accuracy of 89.0% (specificity = 91.7%, recall = 80.3%, and precision = 75.0%) in detecting ARDS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our best knowledge, this is the first study to focus on developing a method to automate the detection of ARDS. Some studies have developed and used other methods to answer other research questions. Expectedly, ARDSFlag generates a significantly higher performance in all accuracy measures compared to those methods.</p>","PeriodicalId":9340,"journal":{"name":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250933/pdf/","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"ARDSFlag: an NLP/machine learning algorithm to visualize and detect high-probability ARDS admissions independent of provider recognition and billing codes.\",\"authors\":\"Amir Gandomi, Phil Wu, Daniel R Clement, Jinyan Xing, Rachel Aviv, Matthew Federbush, Zhiyong Yuan, Yajun Jing, Guangyao Wei, Negin Hajizadeh\",\"doi\":\"10.1186/s12911-024-02573-5\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Despite the significance and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its detection remains highly variable and inconsistent. In this work, we aim to develop an algorithm (ARDSFlag) to automate the diagnosis of ARDS based on the Berlin definition. We also aim to develop a visualization tool that helps clinicians efficiently assess ARDS criteria.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>ARDSFlag applies machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to evaluate Berlin criteria by incorporating structured and unstructured data in an electronic health record (EHR) system. The study cohort includes 19,534 ICU admissions in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The output is the ARDS diagnosis, onset time, and severity.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>ARDSFlag includes separate text classifiers trained using large training sets to find evidence of bilateral infiltrates in radiology reports (accuracy of 91.9%±0.5%) and heart failure/fluid overload in radiology reports (accuracy 86.1%±0.5%) and echocardiogram notes (accuracy 98.4%±0.3%). A test set of 300 cases, which was blindly and independently labeled for ARDS by two groups of clinicians, shows that ARDSFlag generates an overall accuracy of 89.0% (specificity = 91.7%, recall = 80.3%, and precision = 75.0%) in detecting ARDS cases.</p><p><strong>Conclusion: </strong>To our best knowledge, this is the first study to focus on developing a method to automate the detection of ARDS. Some studies have developed and used other methods to answer other research questions. Expectedly, ARDSFlag generates a significantly higher performance in all accuracy measures compared to those methods.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":9340,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC11250933/pdf/\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02573-5\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL INFORMATICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1186/s12911-024-02573-5","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL INFORMATICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:尽管急性呼吸窘迫综合征(ARDS)非常重要且普遍存在,但其检测结果仍存在很大的差异和不一致。在这项工作中,我们旨在开发一种算法(ARDSFlag),根据柏林定义自动诊断 ARDS。我们还旨在开发一种可视化工具,帮助临床医生有效评估 ARDS 标准:ARDSFlag应用机器学习(ML)和自然语言处理(NLP)技术,通过整合电子病历(EHR)系统中的结构化和非结构化数据来评估柏林标准。研究队列包括重症监护医学信息市场 III(MIMIC-III)数据库中的 19,534 例 ICU 住院病例。输出结果为 ARDS 诊断、发病时间和严重程度:ARDSFlag包括使用大型训练集训练的独立文本分类器,可在放射学报告(准确率为91.9%±0.5%)和放射学报告(准确率为86.1%±0.5%)及超声心动图记录(准确率为98.4%±0.3%)中发现双侧浸润的证据以及心力衰竭/体液超负荷的证据。两组临床医生对 300 个病例进行了独立盲标,结果显示 ARDSFlag 在检测 ARDS 病例方面的总体准确率为 89.0%(特异性 = 91.7%,召回率 = 80.3%,精确度 = 75.0%):据我们所知,这是第一项专注于开发自动检测 ARDS 方法的研究。一些研究已经开发并使用了其他方法来回答其他研究问题。与这些方法相比,ARDSFlag 在所有准确性指标上的表现都要高得多。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
ARDSFlag: an NLP/machine learning algorithm to visualize and detect high-probability ARDS admissions independent of provider recognition and billing codes.

Background: Despite the significance and prevalence of acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), its detection remains highly variable and inconsistent. In this work, we aim to develop an algorithm (ARDSFlag) to automate the diagnosis of ARDS based on the Berlin definition. We also aim to develop a visualization tool that helps clinicians efficiently assess ARDS criteria.

Methods: ARDSFlag applies machine learning (ML) and natural language processing (NLP) techniques to evaluate Berlin criteria by incorporating structured and unstructured data in an electronic health record (EHR) system. The study cohort includes 19,534 ICU admissions in the Medical Information Mart for Intensive Care III (MIMIC-III) database. The output is the ARDS diagnosis, onset time, and severity.

Results: ARDSFlag includes separate text classifiers trained using large training sets to find evidence of bilateral infiltrates in radiology reports (accuracy of 91.9%±0.5%) and heart failure/fluid overload in radiology reports (accuracy 86.1%±0.5%) and echocardiogram notes (accuracy 98.4%±0.3%). A test set of 300 cases, which was blindly and independently labeled for ARDS by two groups of clinicians, shows that ARDSFlag generates an overall accuracy of 89.0% (specificity = 91.7%, recall = 80.3%, and precision = 75.0%) in detecting ARDS cases.

Conclusion: To our best knowledge, this is the first study to focus on developing a method to automate the detection of ARDS. Some studies have developed and used other methods to answer other research questions. Expectedly, ARDSFlag generates a significantly higher performance in all accuracy measures compared to those methods.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
7.20
自引率
5.70%
发文量
297
审稿时长
1 months
期刊介绍: BMC Medical Informatics and Decision Making is an open access journal publishing original peer-reviewed research articles in relation to the design, development, implementation, use, and evaluation of health information technologies and decision-making for human health.
期刊最新文献
Real-world data to support post-market safety and performance of embolization coils: evidence generation from a medical device manufacturer and data institute partnership. Development of message passing-based graph convolutional networks for classifying cancer pathology reports Machine learning-based evaluation of prognostic factors for mortality and relapse in patients with acute lymphoblastic leukemia: a comparative simulation study A cross domain access control model for medical consortium based on DBSCAN and penalty function RCC-Supporter: supporting renal cell carcinoma treatment decision-making using machine learning
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1