再生氧化锆的粘合亲和力和耐久性。

IF 4.3 2区 医学 Q1 DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry Pub Date : 2024-09-01 DOI:10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.017
{"title":"再生氧化锆的粘合亲和力和耐久性。","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>While repurposing waste materials into zirconia blocks presents a promising avenue, uncertainty remains regarding whether the bonding properties of recycled zirconia align with those of commercially available zirconia.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding affinity and durability of composite resin to recycled zirconia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A series of processing steps were performed with recycled zirconia residuals (Lava Plus; 3M Oral Care), including pulverization, sieving, heating, compaction, isostatic pressing, and presintering. The presintered blocks of recycled zirconia (Group R) and commercially available zirconia (Group C) were sectioned and sintered to create test specimens (10×10×1.5 mm). After polishing and airborne-particle abrasion, specimens within each group were bonded to composite resin cylinders using a resin cement (Multilink Speed; Ivoclar AG). The specimens were then divided into 3 subgroups for shear bond strength (SBS) testing: no further treatment, 10 000 thermocycles, and 30 000 thermocycles (n=10). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), surface roughness, and contact angle were used to analyze the surface physicochemical differences between Groups C and R. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test for SBS values, Pearson chi-squared test for failure modes, and independent <em>t</em> test for grain size, surface roughness, and wettability (α=.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found in the SBS values between Group R and Group C (<em>P</em>=.403), while thermocycling significantly affected the SBS values (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Group R showed significantly greater R<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>z</sub>, and R<sub>q</sub> values (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) than did Group C. SEM analysis revealed that Group R exhibited more prominent grooves than Group C, while the XRD and EDS patterns exhibited similarities in both the crystalline phase and elemental composition. No significant difference was observed in the water contact angle between the 2 groups (<em>P</em>=.196).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The bonding protocol established for commercially available zirconia was comparable with that of recycled zirconia, but both decreased after thermocycling. The recycling process did not affect the crystalline phase or elemental composition of the zirconia, but it induced alterations in the surface roughness.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":16866,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-09-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324004499/pdfft?md5=622f795c29ceb83810daf28fe794907f&pid=1-s2.0-S0022391324004499-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Bonding affinity and durability of recycled zirconia\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.prosdent.2024.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Statement of problem</h3><p>While repurposing waste materials into zirconia blocks presents a promising avenue, uncertainty remains regarding whether the bonding properties of recycled zirconia align with those of commercially available zirconia.</p></div><div><h3>Purpose</h3><p>The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding affinity and durability of composite resin to recycled zirconia.</p></div><div><h3>Material and methods</h3><p>A series of processing steps were performed with recycled zirconia residuals (Lava Plus; 3M Oral Care), including pulverization, sieving, heating, compaction, isostatic pressing, and presintering. The presintered blocks of recycled zirconia (Group R) and commercially available zirconia (Group C) were sectioned and sintered to create test specimens (10×10×1.5 mm). After polishing and airborne-particle abrasion, specimens within each group were bonded to composite resin cylinders using a resin cement (Multilink Speed; Ivoclar AG). The specimens were then divided into 3 subgroups for shear bond strength (SBS) testing: no further treatment, 10 000 thermocycles, and 30 000 thermocycles (n=10). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), surface roughness, and contact angle were used to analyze the surface physicochemical differences between Groups C and R. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test for SBS values, Pearson chi-squared test for failure modes, and independent <em>t</em> test for grain size, surface roughness, and wettability (α=.05).</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>No significant difference was found in the SBS values between Group R and Group C (<em>P</em>=.403), while thermocycling significantly affected the SBS values (<em>P</em>&lt;.05). Group R showed significantly greater R<sub>a</sub>, R<sub>z</sub>, and R<sub>q</sub> values (<em>P</em>&lt;.05) than did Group C. SEM analysis revealed that Group R exhibited more prominent grooves than Group C, while the XRD and EDS patterns exhibited similarities in both the crystalline phase and elemental composition. No significant difference was observed in the water contact angle between the 2 groups (<em>P</em>=.196).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>The bonding protocol established for commercially available zirconia was comparable with that of recycled zirconia, but both decreased after thermocycling. The recycling process did not affect the crystalline phase or elemental composition of the zirconia, but it induced alterations in the surface roughness.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":16866,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-09-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324004499/pdfft?md5=622f795c29ceb83810daf28fe794907f&pid=1-s2.0-S0022391324004499-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324004499\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022391324004499","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DENTISTRY, ORAL SURGERY & MEDICINE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

问题陈述:虽然将废料再利用为氧化锆块是一个很有前景的途径,但回收氧化锆的粘结性能是否与市售氧化锆的粘结性能一致仍存在不确定性:对回收氧化锆残渣(Lava Plus; 3M Oral Care)进行了一系列处理步骤,包括粉碎、筛分、加热、压实、等静压和预烧结。将预烧结的再生氧化锆块(R 组)和市售氧化锆块(C 组)切片并烧结,制成测试试样(10×10×1.5 毫米)。经过抛光和气载颗粒磨损后,每组中的试样都用树脂粘结剂(Multilink Speed; Ivoclar AG)粘结到复合树脂圆柱体上。然后将试样分为 3 个亚组进行剪切结合强度(SBS)测试:未进一步处理、10 000 热循环和 30 000 热循环(n=10)。使用 X 射线衍射 (XRD)、扫描电子显微镜 (SEM)、能量色散 X 射线光谱分析 (EDS)、表面粗糙度和接触角来分析 C 组和 R 组之间的表面物理化学差异。数据分析采用双向方差分析,SBS 值采用 Tukey 后检验,失效模式采用 Pearson 方差分析,晶粒大小、表面粗糙度和润湿性采用独立 t 检验(α=.05):结果:R 组和 C 组的 SBS 值无明显差异(P=.403),而热循环对 SBS 值(Pa、Rz 和 Rq 值)有明显影响(PConclusions):市售氧化锆与回收氧化锆的粘接方案相当,但热循环后两者的粘接效果都有所下降。回收过程不会影响氧化锆的结晶相或元素组成,但会导致表面粗糙度发生变化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Bonding affinity and durability of recycled zirconia

Statement of problem

While repurposing waste materials into zirconia blocks presents a promising avenue, uncertainty remains regarding whether the bonding properties of recycled zirconia align with those of commercially available zirconia.

Purpose

The purpose of this in vitro study was to evaluate the bonding affinity and durability of composite resin to recycled zirconia.

Material and methods

A series of processing steps were performed with recycled zirconia residuals (Lava Plus; 3M Oral Care), including pulverization, sieving, heating, compaction, isostatic pressing, and presintering. The presintered blocks of recycled zirconia (Group R) and commercially available zirconia (Group C) were sectioned and sintered to create test specimens (10×10×1.5 mm). After polishing and airborne-particle abrasion, specimens within each group were bonded to composite resin cylinders using a resin cement (Multilink Speed; Ivoclar AG). The specimens were then divided into 3 subgroups for shear bond strength (SBS) testing: no further treatment, 10 000 thermocycles, and 30 000 thermocycles (n=10). X-ray diffraction (XRD), scanning electron microscopy (SEM), energy dispersive X-ray spectrometry (EDS), surface roughness, and contact angle were used to analyze the surface physicochemical differences between Groups C and R. Data were analyzed with 2-way ANOVA followed by the Tukey post hoc test for SBS values, Pearson chi-squared test for failure modes, and independent t test for grain size, surface roughness, and wettability (α=.05).

Results

No significant difference was found in the SBS values between Group R and Group C (P=.403), while thermocycling significantly affected the SBS values (P<.05). Group R showed significantly greater Ra, Rz, and Rq values (P<.05) than did Group C. SEM analysis revealed that Group R exhibited more prominent grooves than Group C, while the XRD and EDS patterns exhibited similarities in both the crystalline phase and elemental composition. No significant difference was observed in the water contact angle between the 2 groups (P=.196).

Conclusions

The bonding protocol established for commercially available zirconia was comparable with that of recycled zirconia, but both decreased after thermocycling. The recycling process did not affect the crystalline phase or elemental composition of the zirconia, but it induced alterations in the surface roughness.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry
Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry 医学-牙科与口腔外科
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
13.00%
发文量
599
审稿时长
69 days
期刊介绍: The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is the leading professional journal devoted exclusively to prosthetic and restorative dentistry. The Journal is the official publication for 24 leading U.S. international prosthodontic organizations. The monthly publication features timely, original peer-reviewed articles on the newest techniques, dental materials, and research findings. The Journal serves prosthodontists and dentists in advanced practice, and features color photos that illustrate many step-by-step procedures. The Journal of Prosthetic Dentistry is included in Index Medicus and CINAHL.
期刊最新文献
A method for decontaminating a dental implant and components after abutment screw loosening: A clinical report. Effect of machining method and margin design on the accuracy and margin quality of monolithic zirconia crowns. A digital workflow for recording implant positions and jaw relation for implant-supported complete arch prostheses. Annual review of selected scientific literature: A report of the Committee on Scientific Investigation of the American Academy of Restorative Dentistry. Prosthodontic rehabilitation of a patient after mucormycosis using a digitally fabricated hollow complete denture with 3D printed intramucosal inserts.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1