绊倒后的平衡恢复受绊倒障碍物类型的影响。

IF 2 3区 工程技术 Q3 ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL Ergonomics Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749
Xingda Qu, Baozhan Yang, Weiliang Wang, Xinyao Hu
{"title":"绊倒后的平衡恢复受绊倒障碍物类型的影响。","authors":"Xingda Qu, Baozhan Yang, Weiliang Wang, Xinyao Hu","doi":"10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><p>Occupational falls are often initiated by trips. Mechanical perturbations applied onto the tripped foot are different for different types of tripping obstacles. The present study aimed to determine how different types of tripping obstacles affect balance recovery after trips. Sixty-four healthy adults participated in an experimental study. They were instructed to perform several walking trials, during which two trips were randomly induced, one by a pole-like obstacle and the other by a board-like obstacle. Balance recovery after trips was measured and compared between the two obstacles. Results showed that the board-like obstacle led to longer step-off time, shorter recovery step duration, and smaller minimum hip height, suggesting that the risk of trip-initiated falls could be higher with the board-like obstacle <i>vs.</i> the pole-like obstacle. This finding presents the need for future research to consider the influence of obstacle type when exploring mechanisms for trips and falls.</p>","PeriodicalId":50503,"journal":{"name":"Ergonomics","volume":" ","pages":"1-7"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Balance recovery after trips is affected by the type of tripping obstacles.\",\"authors\":\"Xingda Qu, Baozhan Yang, Weiliang Wang, Xinyao Hu\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><p>Occupational falls are often initiated by trips. Mechanical perturbations applied onto the tripped foot are different for different types of tripping obstacles. The present study aimed to determine how different types of tripping obstacles affect balance recovery after trips. Sixty-four healthy adults participated in an experimental study. They were instructed to perform several walking trials, during which two trips were randomly induced, one by a pole-like obstacle and the other by a board-like obstacle. Balance recovery after trips was measured and compared between the two obstacles. Results showed that the board-like obstacle led to longer step-off time, shorter recovery step duration, and smaller minimum hip height, suggesting that the risk of trip-initiated falls could be higher with the board-like obstacle <i>vs.</i> the pole-like obstacle. This finding presents the need for future research to consider the influence of obstacle type when exploring mechanisms for trips and falls.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":50503,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Ergonomics\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"1-7\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Ergonomics\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Ergonomics","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00140139.2024.2375749","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, INDUSTRIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

职业性跌倒通常是由绊倒引起的。不同类型的绊倒障碍对被绊倒脚的机械扰动是不同的。本研究旨在确定不同类型的绊倒障碍如何影响绊倒后的平衡恢复。64 名健康成年人参加了实验研究。他们被要求进行几次行走试验,其间随机诱发两次绊倒,一次是杆状障碍物,另一次是板状障碍物。测量绊倒后的平衡恢复情况,并对两种障碍物进行比较。结果显示,类似木板的障碍物会导致更长的迈步时间、更短的恢复步长和更小的最低臀高,这表明,类似木板的障碍物与类似杆子的障碍物相比,绊倒引发跌倒的风险可能更高。这一发现表明,在探索绊倒和跌倒的机制时,未来的研究需要考虑障碍物类型的影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Balance recovery after trips is affected by the type of tripping obstacles.

Occupational falls are often initiated by trips. Mechanical perturbations applied onto the tripped foot are different for different types of tripping obstacles. The present study aimed to determine how different types of tripping obstacles affect balance recovery after trips. Sixty-four healthy adults participated in an experimental study. They were instructed to perform several walking trials, during which two trips were randomly induced, one by a pole-like obstacle and the other by a board-like obstacle. Balance recovery after trips was measured and compared between the two obstacles. Results showed that the board-like obstacle led to longer step-off time, shorter recovery step duration, and smaller minimum hip height, suggesting that the risk of trip-initiated falls could be higher with the board-like obstacle vs. the pole-like obstacle. This finding presents the need for future research to consider the influence of obstacle type when exploring mechanisms for trips and falls.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Ergonomics
Ergonomics 工程技术-工程:工业
CiteScore
4.60
自引率
12.50%
发文量
147
审稿时长
6 months
期刊介绍: Ergonomics, also known as human factors, is the scientific discipline that seeks to understand and improve human interactions with products, equipment, environments and systems. Drawing upon human biology, psychology, engineering and design, Ergonomics aims to develop and apply knowledge and techniques to optimise system performance, whilst protecting the health, safety and well-being of individuals involved. The attention of ergonomics extends across work, leisure and other aspects of our daily lives. The journal Ergonomics is an international refereed publication, with a 60 year tradition of disseminating high quality research. Original submissions, both theoretical and applied, are invited from across the subject, including physical, cognitive, organisational and environmental ergonomics. Papers reporting the findings of research from cognate disciplines are also welcome, where these contribute to understanding equipment, tasks, jobs, systems and environments and the corresponding needs, abilities and limitations of people. All published research articles in this journal have undergone rigorous peer review, based on initial editor screening and anonymous refereeing by independent expert referees.
期刊最新文献
Daily stress detection from real-life speeches using acoustic and semantic information. Ergonomic interventions in Kalamkari block printing: addressing challenges and preserving tradition. Development and validation of e-scooter riding behavior questionnaire (ERBQ) among Korean riders. Pain in the upper back is prevailing more than pain in the lower back amongst workers of building construction; a cohort study. Evaluating the use of systems thinking methods in healthcare: a RE-AIM analysis of AcciMap and Net-HARMS.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1