解决塑料污染的政策方案中缺少文化背景这一块

IF 4.9 2区 环境科学与生态学 Q1 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Environmental Science & Policy Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103829
{"title":"解决塑料污染的政策方案中缺少文化背景这一块","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103829","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>The dialogue on solutions to plastic pollution to date has largely focussed on targeting commonly found items or areas where large volumes of litter accumulate in the environment. The need to identify better solutions to reduce plastic pollution at the global scale has been highlighted in recent G7 and G20 discussions. Negotiations are underway for a global, legally-binding Plastics Treaty that countries will hopefully agree on, however, the local implementation of the global agreement will be challenging and complex. Cultural norms and values are likely to influence the adoption of new waste disposal practices and rules, and also impact industry and consumer behaviour and compliance more generally. To date, cultural norms and values have not entered the global solution dialogue. If a global treaty to reduce plastic pollution is to succeed, understanding the potential impact of these cultural dimensions on the potential effectiveness of implementing the agreement is crucial. Building upon the cross-culture research, this paper describes the potential impact of failing to consider cultural aspects in the decision-making process and implementation of the Global Plastics Treaty. As Treaty negotiations are underway, actively considering and addressing the influence of culture will contribute to more inclusive Treaty obligations. This in turn could influence new national plans of action, reporting, compliance and monitoring of plastic pollution by signatory member states.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":313,"journal":{"name":"Environmental Science & Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631/pdfft?md5=cf8347e7238fbc06145507540fc9034d&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001631-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Addressing cultural context is the missing piece in policy solutions to plastic pollution\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.envsci.2024.103829\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>The dialogue on solutions to plastic pollution to date has largely focussed on targeting commonly found items or areas where large volumes of litter accumulate in the environment. The need to identify better solutions to reduce plastic pollution at the global scale has been highlighted in recent G7 and G20 discussions. Negotiations are underway for a global, legally-binding Plastics Treaty that countries will hopefully agree on, however, the local implementation of the global agreement will be challenging and complex. Cultural norms and values are likely to influence the adoption of new waste disposal practices and rules, and also impact industry and consumer behaviour and compliance more generally. To date, cultural norms and values have not entered the global solution dialogue. If a global treaty to reduce plastic pollution is to succeed, understanding the potential impact of these cultural dimensions on the potential effectiveness of implementing the agreement is crucial. Building upon the cross-culture research, this paper describes the potential impact of failing to consider cultural aspects in the decision-making process and implementation of the Global Plastics Treaty. As Treaty negotiations are underway, actively considering and addressing the influence of culture will contribute to more inclusive Treaty obligations. This in turn could influence new national plans of action, reporting, compliance and monitoring of plastic pollution by signatory member states.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":313,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631/pdfft?md5=cf8347e7238fbc06145507540fc9034d&pid=1-s2.0-S1462901124001631-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Environmental Science & Policy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"93\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"环境科学与生态学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Environmental Science & Policy","FirstCategoryId":"93","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1462901124001631","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"环境科学与生态学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

迄今为止,有关塑料污染解决方案的对话主要集中在针对常见物品或环境中大量垃圾堆积的区域。在最近的七国集团和二十国集团的讨论中,强调了需要找到更好的解决方案,在全球范围内减少塑料污染。目前正在就一项具有法律约束力的全球性《塑料条约》进行谈判,希望各国能够达成一致,然而,在地方一级执行全球协议将是一项具有挑战性的复杂工作。文化规范和价值观很可能会影响新的废物处理方法和规则的采用,也会对行业和消费者的行为及遵守规则产生更广泛的影响。迄今为止,文化规范和价值观尚未进入全球解决方案对话。减少塑料污染的全球条约要想取得成功,了解这些文化因素对执行协议的潜在效果的潜在影响至关重要。在跨文化研究的基础上,本文阐述了在决策过程和《全球塑料条约》实施过程中不考虑文化因素的潜在影响。由于《条约》谈判正在进行中,积极考虑和应对文化的影响将有助于履行更具包容性的《条约》义务。这反过来又会影响新的国家行动计划、报告、合规性以及签署国对塑料污染的监测。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Addressing cultural context is the missing piece in policy solutions to plastic pollution

The dialogue on solutions to plastic pollution to date has largely focussed on targeting commonly found items or areas where large volumes of litter accumulate in the environment. The need to identify better solutions to reduce plastic pollution at the global scale has been highlighted in recent G7 and G20 discussions. Negotiations are underway for a global, legally-binding Plastics Treaty that countries will hopefully agree on, however, the local implementation of the global agreement will be challenging and complex. Cultural norms and values are likely to influence the adoption of new waste disposal practices and rules, and also impact industry and consumer behaviour and compliance more generally. To date, cultural norms and values have not entered the global solution dialogue. If a global treaty to reduce plastic pollution is to succeed, understanding the potential impact of these cultural dimensions on the potential effectiveness of implementing the agreement is crucial. Building upon the cross-culture research, this paper describes the potential impact of failing to consider cultural aspects in the decision-making process and implementation of the Global Plastics Treaty. As Treaty negotiations are underway, actively considering and addressing the influence of culture will contribute to more inclusive Treaty obligations. This in turn could influence new national plans of action, reporting, compliance and monitoring of plastic pollution by signatory member states.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Environmental Science & Policy
Environmental Science & Policy 环境科学-环境科学
CiteScore
10.90
自引率
8.30%
发文量
332
审稿时长
68 days
期刊介绍: Environmental Science & Policy promotes communication among government, business and industry, academia, and non-governmental organisations who are instrumental in the solution of environmental problems. It also seeks to advance interdisciplinary research of policy relevance on environmental issues such as climate change, biodiversity, environmental pollution and wastes, renewable and non-renewable natural resources, sustainability, and the interactions among these issues. The journal emphasises the linkages between these environmental issues and social and economic issues such as production, transport, consumption, growth, demographic changes, well-being, and health. However, the subject coverage will not be restricted to these issues and the introduction of new dimensions will be encouraged.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board Attending to the unattended: Why and how do local governments plan for access and functional needs in climate risk reduction? Beyond Academia: A case for reviews of gray literature for science-policy processes and applied research Of heroes and villains – How coalitions shape their narratives and what the public conservation debate is actually about? Enhancing meaningful Indigenous leadership and collaboration in international environmental governance forums
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1