{"title":"了解如何为学生组织制定合法的选拔政策","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41402","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>Colleges and universities are still finding their footing after <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College</i> (referred to as “<i>SFFA</i>”), 600 U.S. 181 (2023). In <i>SFFA</i>, the U.S. Supreme Court found that race-based admission processes at colleges and universities were unconstitutional, overturning decades of precedent.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Learn how to create lawful selection policy for student organizations\",\"authors\":\"Eric Lyerly Esq.\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/cala.41402\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p>Colleges and universities are still finding their footing after <i>Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College</i> (referred to as “<i>SFFA</i>”), 600 U.S. 181 (2023). In <i>SFFA</i>, the U.S. Supreme Court found that race-based admission processes at colleges and universities were unconstitutional, overturning decades of precedent.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":100209,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Campus Legal Advisor\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41402\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Campus Legal Advisor","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/cala.41402","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
在学生公平入学公司诉哈佛大学校长和研究员案（简称 "SFFA"）（600 U.S. 181 (2023)）之后，高校仍在寻找自己的立足点。在 SFFA 案中，美国最高法院认定高校基于种族的招生程序违宪，推翻了数十年的先例。
Learn how to create lawful selection policy for student organizations
Colleges and universities are still finding their footing after Students for Fair Admissions, Inc. v. President & Fellows of Harvard College (referred to as “SFFA”), 600 U.S. 181 (2023). In SFFA, the U.S. Supreme Court found that race-based admission processes at colleges and universities were unconstitutional, overturning decades of precedent.
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
分享
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
扫码关注我们
