Although Title IX has long been familiar to college athletics, the name, image, and likeness enterprise may forever change our equity calculus in yet-to-be-determined ways. Title IX saw substantial changes in 2024 with the Biden administration's new regulations, but proposed athletic-specific regulations were never implemented. Now, the 2024 regulations have been vacated by a federal court in Kentucky and even more changes loom with a new presidential administration. Meanwhile, the world of NIL has burgeoned, introducing a new and dynamic array of policy and practice quandaries.
{"title":"Gain insight into potential implications of Title IX's intersection with NIL","authors":"Blaze Bowers J.D.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41549","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41549","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Although Title IX has long been familiar to college athletics, the name, image, and likeness enterprise may forever change our equity calculus in yet-to-be-determined ways. Title IX saw substantial changes in 2024 with the Biden administration's new regulations, but proposed athletic-specific regulations were never implemented. Now, the 2024 regulations have been vacated by a federal court in Kentucky and even more changes loom with a new presidential administration. Meanwhile, the world of NIL has burgeoned, introducing a new and dynamic array of policy and practice quandaries.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"1-6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404369","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Case name:Ohlsen, etc., et al. v. William Floyd School District, et al., No. 18515/15 (N.Y. App. Div. 10/23/24).
{"title":"Court rules in favor of injured cheerleader","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41555","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41555","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Ohlsen, etc., et al. v. William Floyd School District, et al</i>., No. 18515/15 (N.Y. App. Div. 10/23/24).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"7"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404378","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Replacing the term “disability” with “qualifying condition” on disclosure forms can significantly increase the disability disclosure rate for employees, according to a study led by Northern Illinois University Psychology Professor Alecia Santuzzi.
{"title":"Changing terminology on forms can increase disclosures by employees","authors":"Eric Lyerly Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41552","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41552","url":null,"abstract":"<p>Replacing the term “disability” with “qualifying condition” on disclosure forms can significantly increase the disability disclosure rate for employees, according to a study led by Northern Illinois University Psychology Professor Alecia Santuzzi.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"6"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404377","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Case name:Zehnder v. Mayo Clinic, et al., No. CV-23-00355 (D. Ariz. 09/30/24).
{"title":"Judge rules against medical resident","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41562","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41562","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Zehnder v. Mayo Clinic, et al</i>., No. CV-23-00355 (D. Ariz. 09/30/24).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"10-11"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404371","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
With campaign rhetoric now in the rear-view mirror, higher education administrators are assessing the impact of the change in executive branch leadership and a new Congress resulting from the November 2024 election. To some degree, we’re all trying to read the tea leaves to assess where changes will be most significant. Ultimately, administrators will need to stay tuned to initiatives making their way through the federal government either through federal regulatory developments, executive branch nonregulatory guidance, and legislative action. At the same time, administrators must keep in mind that state laws will impact some of the legal obligations and constraints applicable to institutions of higher education.
{"title":"Stay abreast of regulatory changes initiated by 2nd Trump administration, new Congress","authors":"Michael Porter Esq.","doi":"10.1002/cala.41551","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41551","url":null,"abstract":"<p>With campaign rhetoric now in the rear-view mirror, higher education administrators are assessing the impact of the change in executive branch leadership and a new Congress resulting from the November 2024 election. To some degree, we’re all trying to read the tea leaves to assess where changes will be most significant. Ultimately, administrators will need to stay tuned to initiatives making their way through the federal government either through federal regulatory developments, executive branch nonregulatory guidance, and legislative action. At the same time, administrators must keep in mind that state laws will impact some of the legal obligations and constraints applicable to institutions of higher education.</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"3-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404376","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Case name:Doe v. University of Southern Indiana, No. 3:21-cv-00144 (S.D. Ind. 09/24/24).
{"title":"Judge rules against student-athlete","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41557","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41557","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Doe v. University of Southern Indiana</i>, No. 3:21-cv-00144 (S.D. Ind. 09/24/24).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"8"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404380","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Case name:Zhornitsky v. Yale School of Medicine, et al., No. 3:24-CV-00018 (D. Conn. 11/25/24).
{"title":"Court refuses to reject claim involving university","authors":"","doi":"10.1002/cala.41569","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.1002/cala.41569","url":null,"abstract":"<p><b>Case name:</b> <i>Zhornitsky v. Yale School of Medicine, et al</i>., No. 3:24-CV-00018 (D. Conn. 11/25/24).</p>","PeriodicalId":100209,"journal":{"name":"Campus Legal Advisor","volume":"25 7","pages":"13-14"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2025-02-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"143404274","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：
京公网安备 11010802042870号