同时服用伏立康唑和利福布汀会增加多重感染患者出现药物不良反应的风险

IF 2.8 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Pub Date : 2024-07-16 DOI:10.1097/FTD.0000000000001241
Yoonjin Kim, Sungyeun Bae, Ki Young Huh, Jong Sun Joo, Jikyo Lee, Sang Hoon Song, Kyung-Sang Yu, In-Jin Jang, Jaeseong Oh
{"title":"同时服用伏立康唑和利福布汀会增加多重感染患者出现药物不良反应的风险","authors":"Yoonjin Kim, Sungyeun Bae, Ki Young Huh, Jong Sun Joo, Jikyo Lee, Sang Hoon Song, Kyung-Sang Yu, In-Jin Jang, Jaeseong Oh","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001241","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coinfection of tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacteria and Aspergillus presents a challenge in medication selection because of the pharmacokinetic interactions between rifampin and voriconazole. Some researchers have suggested the use of rifabutin as an alternative to rifampin because of its lower hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme induction potency despite its contraindication to drug labels. This study presents clinical cases of voriconazole and rifabutin coadministration and their potential risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted using clinical data from patients who met the following criteria: (1) admitted to Seoul National University Hospital between July 2014 and August 2023 and (2) concurrently administered rifabutin and voriconazole for more than 5 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 6 patients analyzed, 4 experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Three patients experienced visual and auditory hallucinations, lower extremity numbness, or delirious behavior. Two patients had prolonged the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave intervals, and 1 had elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels. In addition, 2 patients experienced severe nausea, poor oral intake, and weight loss. Despite receiving 1.81-fold the recommended voriconazole dosage, a therapeutic concentration (1.0-5.5 mg/L) was not achieved because of cytochrome P450 induction by rifabutin. However, during septic shock, the voriconazole concentration increased by 13.7- to 36-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrent use of rifabutin and voriconazole was associated with ADRs, including the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave prolongation, hallucinations, and severe nausea. Moreover, initially, there was a significant decrease in voriconazole concentrations; however, these concentrations substantially increased during septic shock. Therefore, it is essential to monitor drug concentrations and ADRs during concurrent use of voriconazole and rifabutin.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-16","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Coadministration of Voriconazole and Rifabutin Can Increase the Risk of Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Multiple Infections.\",\"authors\":\"Yoonjin Kim, Sungyeun Bae, Ki Young Huh, Jong Sun Joo, Jikyo Lee, Sang Hoon Song, Kyung-Sang Yu, In-Jin Jang, Jaeseong Oh\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001241\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Coinfection of tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacteria and Aspergillus presents a challenge in medication selection because of the pharmacokinetic interactions between rifampin and voriconazole. Some researchers have suggested the use of rifabutin as an alternative to rifampin because of its lower hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme induction potency despite its contraindication to drug labels. This study presents clinical cases of voriconazole and rifabutin coadministration and their potential risks.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>This retrospective study was conducted using clinical data from patients who met the following criteria: (1) admitted to Seoul National University Hospital between July 2014 and August 2023 and (2) concurrently administered rifabutin and voriconazole for more than 5 days.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>Among the 6 patients analyzed, 4 experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Three patients experienced visual and auditory hallucinations, lower extremity numbness, or delirious behavior. Two patients had prolonged the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave intervals, and 1 had elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels. In addition, 2 patients experienced severe nausea, poor oral intake, and weight loss. Despite receiving 1.81-fold the recommended voriconazole dosage, a therapeutic concentration (1.0-5.5 mg/L) was not achieved because of cytochrome P450 induction by rifabutin. However, during septic shock, the voriconazole concentration increased by 13.7- to 36-fold.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Concurrent use of rifabutin and voriconazole was associated with ADRs, including the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave prolongation, hallucinations, and severe nausea. Moreover, initially, there was a significant decrease in voriconazole concentrations; however, these concentrations substantially increased during septic shock. Therefore, it is essential to monitor drug concentrations and ADRs during concurrent use of voriconazole and rifabutin.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-16\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001241\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001241","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景:由于利福平和伏立康唑之间的药代动力学相互作用,结核病或非结核分枝杆菌和曲霉菌的合并感染给药物选择带来了挑战。一些研究人员建议使用利福布汀作为利福平的替代药物,因为尽管利福布汀在药物标签上有禁忌,但其肝细胞色素 P450 酶诱导效力较低。本研究介绍了伏立康唑和利福布汀联合用药的临床病例及其潜在风险:这项回顾性研究使用了符合以下标准的患者的临床数据:(1)2014年7月至2023年8月期间入住首尔大学医院;(2)同时服用利福布汀和伏立康唑超过5天:在分析的 6 名患者中,4 人出现了药物不良反应(ADR)。3 名患者出现视听幻觉、下肢麻木或神志不清。两名患者出现了从 Q 波开始到 T 波间期结束的时间延长,一名患者出现了天门冬氨酸氨基转移酶和丙氨酸氨基转移酶水平升高。此外,2 名患者出现了严重的恶心、口腔吞咽困难和体重减轻。尽管患者服用的伏立康唑剂量是推荐剂量的 1.81 倍,但由于利福布汀诱导细胞色素 P450 的作用,治疗浓度(1.0-5.5 mg/L)并未达到。然而,在脓毒性休克期间,伏立康唑的浓度增加了 13.7 至 36 倍:结论:同时使用利福布汀和伏立康唑与不良反应有关,包括从 Q 波开始到 T 波结束的时间延长、幻觉和严重恶心。此外,最初伏立康唑的浓度显著下降,但在脓毒性休克期间浓度大幅上升。因此,在同时使用伏立康唑和利福布汀期间,必须监测药物浓度和不良反应。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Coadministration of Voriconazole and Rifabutin Can Increase the Risk of Adverse Drug Reactions in Patients with Multiple Infections.

Background: Coinfection of tuberculosis or nontuberculous mycobacteria and Aspergillus presents a challenge in medication selection because of the pharmacokinetic interactions between rifampin and voriconazole. Some researchers have suggested the use of rifabutin as an alternative to rifampin because of its lower hepatic cytochrome P450 enzyme induction potency despite its contraindication to drug labels. This study presents clinical cases of voriconazole and rifabutin coadministration and their potential risks.

Methods: This retrospective study was conducted using clinical data from patients who met the following criteria: (1) admitted to Seoul National University Hospital between July 2014 and August 2023 and (2) concurrently administered rifabutin and voriconazole for more than 5 days.

Results: Among the 6 patients analyzed, 4 experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Three patients experienced visual and auditory hallucinations, lower extremity numbness, or delirious behavior. Two patients had prolonged the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave intervals, and 1 had elevated aspartate aminotransferase and alanine aminotransferase levels. In addition, 2 patients experienced severe nausea, poor oral intake, and weight loss. Despite receiving 1.81-fold the recommended voriconazole dosage, a therapeutic concentration (1.0-5.5 mg/L) was not achieved because of cytochrome P450 induction by rifabutin. However, during septic shock, the voriconazole concentration increased by 13.7- to 36-fold.

Conclusions: Concurrent use of rifabutin and voriconazole was associated with ADRs, including the time from the start of the Q wave to the end of the T wave prolongation, hallucinations, and severe nausea. Moreover, initially, there was a significant decrease in voriconazole concentrations; however, these concentrations substantially increased during septic shock. Therefore, it is essential to monitor drug concentrations and ADRs during concurrent use of voriconazole and rifabutin.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring 医学-毒理学
CiteScore
5.00
自引率
8.00%
发文量
213
审稿时长
4-8 weeks
期刊介绍: Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.
期刊最新文献
Midazolam Boosting With Cobicistat in a Patient With Drug-Resistant Epilepsy and Focal Status Epilepticus. New Developments and Therapeutic Drug Monitoring Options in Costimulatory Blockade in Solid Organ Transplantation: A Systematic Critical Review. Implementation of Volumetric Finger-Prick Self-Sampling for TDM of Immunosuppressants After Kidney Transplantation: Lessons Learned from the Practice. Examining Whole Blood, Total and Free Plasma Tacrolimus in Elderly Kidney Transplant Recipients. Precision Dosing of Intravenous Tocilizumab: Development of Pharmacokinetic Model-Derived Tapering Strategies for Patients With Rheumatoid Arthritis.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1