Yuki Hanai, Kazutaka Oda, Takashi Ueda, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Lisa Murakami, Shusuke Uekusa, Hayato Ohashi, Koji Nishimura, Yoshio Takesue, Kazuhiro Matsuo
{"title":"儿童治疗药物监测的最佳替考拉宁低浓度:系统回顾与元分析》。","authors":"Yuki Hanai, Kazutaka Oda, Takashi Ueda, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Lisa Murakami, Shusuke Uekusa, Hayato Ohashi, Koji Nishimura, Yoshio Takesue, Kazuhiro Matsuo","doi":"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001230","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teicoplanin is used to treat serious Gram-positive bacterial infections. However, the optimal trough concentrations for pediatric patients remain unclear owing to the lack of monitoring guidelines. This study aimed to determine the optimal teicoplanin trough concentration for treating Gram-positive bacterial infections in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. Stepwise cutoffs within the range of 10-30 mcg/mL were used for efficacy and safety. Studies were included if they reported treatment success rates and/or all-cause mortality, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia according to the trough concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 12 studies involving 830 pediatric patients. Teicoplanin cutoff values of 10, 15, 20, and 30 mcg/mL were reported in 9, 8, 9, and 2 studies, respectively. Trough concentrations <10 mcg/mL significantly reduced the treatment success rate, with an odds ratio of 0.07 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.01 to 0.40. The overall treatment success rate was 50.0% versus 95.7% observed at concentrations ≥10 mcg/mL. However, no significant difference was observed at the 15-, 20-, and 30-mcg/mL cutoffs, when compared with lower concentrations. Trough concentrations <20 mcg/mL were associated with a decreased risk of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.55). However, hepatotoxicity and thrombocytopenia showed no significant associations with trough concentration ranges between 10 and 30 mcg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although further prospective studies are required for validation, the authors' findings suggest that 10- to 20-mcg/mL teicoplanin is the optimal trough concentration for enhanced clinical success and reduced toxicity in pediatric patients.</p>","PeriodicalId":23052,"journal":{"name":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Optimal Teicoplanin Trough Concentration With Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.\",\"authors\":\"Yuki Hanai, Kazutaka Oda, Takashi Ueda, Kazuaki Matsumoto, Lisa Murakami, Shusuke Uekusa, Hayato Ohashi, Koji Nishimura, Yoshio Takesue, Kazuhiro Matsuo\",\"doi\":\"10.1097/FTD.0000000000001230\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<p><strong>Background: </strong>Teicoplanin is used to treat serious Gram-positive bacterial infections. However, the optimal trough concentrations for pediatric patients remain unclear owing to the lack of monitoring guidelines. This study aimed to determine the optimal teicoplanin trough concentration for treating Gram-positive bacterial infections in children.</p><p><strong>Methods: </strong>A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. Stepwise cutoffs within the range of 10-30 mcg/mL were used for efficacy and safety. Studies were included if they reported treatment success rates and/or all-cause mortality, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia according to the trough concentration.</p><p><strong>Results: </strong>The meta-analysis included 12 studies involving 830 pediatric patients. Teicoplanin cutoff values of 10, 15, 20, and 30 mcg/mL were reported in 9, 8, 9, and 2 studies, respectively. Trough concentrations <10 mcg/mL significantly reduced the treatment success rate, with an odds ratio of 0.07 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.01 to 0.40. The overall treatment success rate was 50.0% versus 95.7% observed at concentrations ≥10 mcg/mL. However, no significant difference was observed at the 15-, 20-, and 30-mcg/mL cutoffs, when compared with lower concentrations. Trough concentrations <20 mcg/mL were associated with a decreased risk of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.55). However, hepatotoxicity and thrombocytopenia showed no significant associations with trough concentration ranges between 10 and 30 mcg/mL.</p><p><strong>Conclusions: </strong>Although further prospective studies are required for validation, the authors' findings suggest that 10- to 20-mcg/mL teicoplanin is the optimal trough concentration for enhanced clinical success and reduced toxicity in pediatric patients.</p>\",\"PeriodicalId\":23052,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"volume\":\" \",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001230\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Therapeutic Drug Monitoring","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1097/FTD.0000000000001230","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICAL LABORATORY TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Optimal Teicoplanin Trough Concentration With Therapeutic Drug Monitoring in Children: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Background: Teicoplanin is used to treat serious Gram-positive bacterial infections. However, the optimal trough concentrations for pediatric patients remain unclear owing to the lack of monitoring guidelines. This study aimed to determine the optimal teicoplanin trough concentration for treating Gram-positive bacterial infections in children.
Methods: A systematic review was conducted using 4 databases. Stepwise cutoffs within the range of 10-30 mcg/mL were used for efficacy and safety. Studies were included if they reported treatment success rates and/or all-cause mortality, nephrotoxicity, hepatotoxicity, and thrombocytopenia according to the trough concentration.
Results: The meta-analysis included 12 studies involving 830 pediatric patients. Teicoplanin cutoff values of 10, 15, 20, and 30 mcg/mL were reported in 9, 8, 9, and 2 studies, respectively. Trough concentrations <10 mcg/mL significantly reduced the treatment success rate, with an odds ratio of 0.07 and a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.01 to 0.40. The overall treatment success rate was 50.0% versus 95.7% observed at concentrations ≥10 mcg/mL. However, no significant difference was observed at the 15-, 20-, and 30-mcg/mL cutoffs, when compared with lower concentrations. Trough concentrations <20 mcg/mL were associated with a decreased risk of nephrotoxicity (odds ratio = 0.21; 95% confidence interval, 0.08-0.55). However, hepatotoxicity and thrombocytopenia showed no significant associations with trough concentration ranges between 10 and 30 mcg/mL.
Conclusions: Although further prospective studies are required for validation, the authors' findings suggest that 10- to 20-mcg/mL teicoplanin is the optimal trough concentration for enhanced clinical success and reduced toxicity in pediatric patients.
期刊介绍:
Therapeutic Drug Monitoring is a peer-reviewed, multidisciplinary journal directed to an audience of pharmacologists, clinical chemists, laboratorians, pharmacists, drug researchers and toxicologists. It fosters the exchange of knowledge among the various disciplines–clinical pharmacology, pathology, toxicology, analytical chemistry–that share a common interest in Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. The journal presents studies detailing the various factors that affect the rate and extent drugs are absorbed, metabolized, and excreted. Regular features include review articles on specific classes of drugs, original articles, case reports, technical notes, and continuing education articles.