Microtus hartingi 和 Microtus guentheri (Cricetidae, Arvicolinae) 的综合研究以及 Microtus elbeyli 的分类问题

IF 1.2 3区 生物学 Q2 ZOOLOGY Zoologischer Anzeiger Pub Date : 2024-07-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jcz.2024.07.002
Ahmet Yesari Selçuk , Alaettin Kaya , Haluk Kefelioğlu
{"title":"Microtus hartingi 和 Microtus guentheri (Cricetidae, Arvicolinae) 的综合研究以及 Microtus elbeyli 的分类问题","authors":"Ahmet Yesari Selçuk ,&nbsp;Alaettin Kaya ,&nbsp;Haluk Kefelioğlu","doi":"10.1016/j.jcz.2024.07.002","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>In this study, Taxonomic differences between <em>Microtus guentheri</em> and <em>Microtus hartingi</em>, which are similar in terms of external morphological features, were determined using linear morphometric, geometric morphometric, karyological and molecular analyses methods. Through classical morphometric (mean values) and geometric morphometric analyses of craniodental and mandible characters, influenced by various genetic, developmental, and functional processes, it was found that <em>M. hartingi</em> and <em>M. guentheri</em> exhibited notable differences in both mean linear measurements and shape. The Jackknife in classical morphometric analyses of samples, which underwent molecular and karyological species diagnoses, was higher than 88 % for each character. In geometric morphometric analyses, the Procrustes distance for shape follows the order Ventral &lt; Dorsal &lt; Mandible &lt; M3&lt;M2&lt;M1. Based on cross-validation, the accurate classification rate is between 73 and 100 %. In both mean linear measurements and centroid size, <em>M. hartingi</em> specimens exhibited significantly larger mandibles and craniodentals compared to individuals of <em>M</em>. <em>guentheri</em>. According to PLS results, there was a significant relationship between the shape of M1, M2 and M3 and environmental variables, while the relationship between their size and environmental variables was not significant. However, neither the shape nor the size of the other parts had an sufficient relationship with environmental variables. Both species exhibited karyological similarity with a chromosome number of 2n = 54, but display polymorphism in chromosome arm number. There were differences in the C-banding of autosomal chromosomes and X chromosome. The classification of species in classical and geometric morphometric analyses, diverges from the outcomes of karyological and molecular assessments. In both species, the intraspecific genetic distance remained below 1.35 %. The <em>cyt-b</em> exhibits significant differentiation between the two species (K2P = 6.55 %). The divergence time for <em>M. guentheri</em> from the clade containing <em>M. hartingi</em> + <em>M. qazvinensis</em> + <em>Microtus dogramacii</em> was estimated to be 0.73 million years ago. Since no sample of <em>Microtus elbeyli</em> with karyological and <em>cyt-b</em> characteristics was found in the samples taken from the type locality, the taxonomic status of <em>M. elbeyli</em> remains unclear.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":49332,"journal":{"name":"Zoologischer Anzeiger","volume":"311 ","pages":"Pages 131-144"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Integrative studies of Microtus hartingi and Microtus guentheri (Cricetidae, Arvicolinae) and taxonomic problem of Microtus elbeyli\",\"authors\":\"Ahmet Yesari Selçuk ,&nbsp;Alaettin Kaya ,&nbsp;Haluk Kefelioğlu\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.jcz.2024.07.002\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>In this study, Taxonomic differences between <em>Microtus guentheri</em> and <em>Microtus hartingi</em>, which are similar in terms of external morphological features, were determined using linear morphometric, geometric morphometric, karyological and molecular analyses methods. Through classical morphometric (mean values) and geometric morphometric analyses of craniodental and mandible characters, influenced by various genetic, developmental, and functional processes, it was found that <em>M. hartingi</em> and <em>M. guentheri</em> exhibited notable differences in both mean linear measurements and shape. The Jackknife in classical morphometric analyses of samples, which underwent molecular and karyological species diagnoses, was higher than 88 % for each character. In geometric morphometric analyses, the Procrustes distance for shape follows the order Ventral &lt; Dorsal &lt; Mandible &lt; M3&lt;M2&lt;M1. Based on cross-validation, the accurate classification rate is between 73 and 100 %. In both mean linear measurements and centroid size, <em>M. hartingi</em> specimens exhibited significantly larger mandibles and craniodentals compared to individuals of <em>M</em>. <em>guentheri</em>. According to PLS results, there was a significant relationship between the shape of M1, M2 and M3 and environmental variables, while the relationship between their size and environmental variables was not significant. However, neither the shape nor the size of the other parts had an sufficient relationship with environmental variables. Both species exhibited karyological similarity with a chromosome number of 2n = 54, but display polymorphism in chromosome arm number. There were differences in the C-banding of autosomal chromosomes and X chromosome. The classification of species in classical and geometric morphometric analyses, diverges from the outcomes of karyological and molecular assessments. In both species, the intraspecific genetic distance remained below 1.35 %. The <em>cyt-b</em> exhibits significant differentiation between the two species (K2P = 6.55 %). The divergence time for <em>M. guentheri</em> from the clade containing <em>M. hartingi</em> + <em>M. qazvinensis</em> + <em>Microtus dogramacii</em> was estimated to be 0.73 million years ago. Since no sample of <em>Microtus elbeyli</em> with karyological and <em>cyt-b</em> characteristics was found in the samples taken from the type locality, the taxonomic status of <em>M. elbeyli</em> remains unclear.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":49332,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Zoologischer Anzeiger\",\"volume\":\"311 \",\"pages\":\"Pages 131-144\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Zoologischer Anzeiger\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044523124000524\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"生物学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ZOOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Zoologischer Anzeiger","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0044523124000524","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"生物学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ZOOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究采用线性形态计量学、几何形态计量学、核仁学和分子分析方法,确定了外部形态特征相似的Microtus guentheri和Microtus hartingi在分类学上的差异。通过对受各种遗传、发育和功能过程影响的颅齿和下颌骨特征进行经典形态计量学(平均值)和几何形态计量学分析,发现 M. hartingi 和 M. guentheri 在平均线性测量值和形状方面都表现出明显的差异。在对样本进行经典形态计量分析时,对每个特征进行分子和核果学物种诊断的杰克刀系数(Jackknife)均高于 88%。在几何形态计量分析中,形状的普罗克鲁斯距离(Procrustes distance)按照腹部、背部、下颌、M3<M2<M1的顺序排列。根据交叉验证,分类准确率在 73% 到 100% 之间。无论是平均线性测量值还是中心点尺寸,M. hartingi 标本的下颌骨和头盖骨都明显大于 M. guentheri。根据 PLS 结果,M1、M2 和 M3 的形状与环境变量之间存在显著关系,而它们的大小与环境变量之间的关系不显著。然而,其他部分的形状和大小与环境变量都没有足够的关系。两个物种的染色体数目相似,均为 2n = 54,但染色体臂数存在多态性。常染色体和 X 染色体的 C 带存在差异。经典形态分析和几何形态分析中的物种分类与核果学和分子评估的结果不同。在这两个物种中,种内遗传距离保持在 1.35 % 以下。cyt-b 在两个物种之间表现出明显的差异(K2P = 6.55 %)。据估计,M. guentheri从包含M. harti + M. qazvinensis + Microtus dogramacii的支系中分化出来的时间为0.73百万年前。由于在模式产地采集的样本中没有发现具有核仁学和细胞生物学特征的肘趾猿样本,因此肘趾猿的分类地位仍不明确。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Integrative studies of Microtus hartingi and Microtus guentheri (Cricetidae, Arvicolinae) and taxonomic problem of Microtus elbeyli

In this study, Taxonomic differences between Microtus guentheri and Microtus hartingi, which are similar in terms of external morphological features, were determined using linear morphometric, geometric morphometric, karyological and molecular analyses methods. Through classical morphometric (mean values) and geometric morphometric analyses of craniodental and mandible characters, influenced by various genetic, developmental, and functional processes, it was found that M. hartingi and M. guentheri exhibited notable differences in both mean linear measurements and shape. The Jackknife in classical morphometric analyses of samples, which underwent molecular and karyological species diagnoses, was higher than 88 % for each character. In geometric morphometric analyses, the Procrustes distance for shape follows the order Ventral < Dorsal < Mandible < M3<M2<M1. Based on cross-validation, the accurate classification rate is between 73 and 100 %. In both mean linear measurements and centroid size, M. hartingi specimens exhibited significantly larger mandibles and craniodentals compared to individuals of M. guentheri. According to PLS results, there was a significant relationship between the shape of M1, M2 and M3 and environmental variables, while the relationship between their size and environmental variables was not significant. However, neither the shape nor the size of the other parts had an sufficient relationship with environmental variables. Both species exhibited karyological similarity with a chromosome number of 2n = 54, but display polymorphism in chromosome arm number. There were differences in the C-banding of autosomal chromosomes and X chromosome. The classification of species in classical and geometric morphometric analyses, diverges from the outcomes of karyological and molecular assessments. In both species, the intraspecific genetic distance remained below 1.35 %. The cyt-b exhibits significant differentiation between the two species (K2P = 6.55 %). The divergence time for M. guentheri from the clade containing M. hartingi + M. qazvinensis + Microtus dogramacii was estimated to be 0.73 million years ago. Since no sample of Microtus elbeyli with karyological and cyt-b characteristics was found in the samples taken from the type locality, the taxonomic status of M. elbeyli remains unclear.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Zoologischer Anzeiger
Zoologischer Anzeiger 生物-动物学
CiteScore
2.80
自引率
7.10%
发文量
75
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Zoologischer Anzeiger - A Journal of Comparative Zoology is devoted to comparative zoology with a special emphasis on morphology, systematics, biogeography, and evolutionary biology targeting all metazoans, both modern and extinct. We also consider taxonomic submissions addressing a broader systematic and/or evolutionary context. The overall aim of the journal is to contribute to our understanding of the organismic world from an evolutionary perspective. The journal Zoologischer Anzeiger invites suggestions for special issues. Interested parties may contact one of the editors.
期刊最新文献
Integrative phylogeny of Corydoradinae (Siluriformes: Callichthyidae) with an emphasis on northwestern La Plata species, including descriptions of a new genus and species Size as a determinant of robustness: Exploring sexual dimorphism in the size and shape of the snapping and cutting claws in Alpheus (caridea: Alpheidae) To be, or not tu-be? Population structure and connectivity in three Arctic kinorhynch species: Echinoderes aquilonius, Echinoderes eximus and Echinoderes remanei Discovery of two new species of cobia (Pisces; Rachycentridae) inhabiting the makran coast of the northern Arabian Sea with notes on their biology and ecology Biological traits of a commercial mussel species Mytilus platensis from the South Atlantic Ocean: Environmental drivers affecting on its intertidal population
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1