使用主流桌面 3D 打印机制作的小儿上气道模型的几何验证

{"title":"使用主流桌面 3D 打印机制作的小儿上气道模型的几何验证","authors":"","doi":"10.1016/j.stlm.2024.100165","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become increasingly affordable. Several research projects used 3D printing to create in vitro upper airways model. However, studies using a mainstream desktop 3D printer never performed geometric validation of their model. The aim of this study was to perform geometric validation of a pediatric upper airways model printed with a mainstream desktop 3D printer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Head computerized tomography (CT) scan of a 10-month-old female underwent segmentation between airways and surrounding anatomical structures. Airways segmentation allowed their measurement for further comparison with printed model. Head segmentation enabled the creation of a 3D printable volume file. To proceed to the geometric validation of the head model, the latter underwent a CT scan. Similar segmentation work was performed on the printed model for comparison. Overlap proportion between the original infant volume and the printed model as well as an average Hausdorff distance were calculated after manual alignment between the original and printed model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Volumes were 12.31 cm<sup>3</sup> and 12.32 cm<sup>3</sup> for the pediatric and the printed model upper airways, respectively (0.08% difference). Dice coefficient of original and printed model was 0.92. The average Hausdorff distance was 0.21 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Desktop mainstream 3D printers can generate pediatric upper airway model with a high dimensional accuracy, as evidenced by our comprehensive geometrical validation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":72210,"journal":{"name":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964124000249/pdfft?md5=8cfe714703dbecce3e19adc0e2c0c990&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964124000249-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Geometric validation of a pediatric upper airways model made using a mainstream desktop 3D printer\",\"authors\":\"\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.stlm.2024.100165\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become increasingly affordable. Several research projects used 3D printing to create in vitro upper airways model. However, studies using a mainstream desktop 3D printer never performed geometric validation of their model. The aim of this study was to perform geometric validation of a pediatric upper airways model printed with a mainstream desktop 3D printer.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>Head computerized tomography (CT) scan of a 10-month-old female underwent segmentation between airways and surrounding anatomical structures. Airways segmentation allowed their measurement for further comparison with printed model. Head segmentation enabled the creation of a 3D printable volume file. To proceed to the geometric validation of the head model, the latter underwent a CT scan. Similar segmentation work was performed on the printed model for comparison. Overlap proportion between the original infant volume and the printed model as well as an average Hausdorff distance were calculated after manual alignment between the original and printed model.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Volumes were 12.31 cm<sup>3</sup> and 12.32 cm<sup>3</sup> for the pediatric and the printed model upper airways, respectively (0.08% difference). Dice coefficient of original and printed model was 0.92. The average Hausdorff distance was 0.21 mm.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Desktop mainstream 3D printers can generate pediatric upper airway model with a high dimensional accuracy, as evidenced by our comprehensive geometrical validation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":72210,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964124000249/pdfft?md5=8cfe714703dbecce3e19adc0e2c0c990&pid=1-s2.0-S2666964124000249-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Annals of 3D printed medicine\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964124000249\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"Medicine\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of 3D printed medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666964124000249","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Medicine","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景三维(3D)打印变得越来越经济实惠。一些研究项目使用三维打印技术制作体外上呼吸道模型。然而,使用主流桌面 3D 打印机的研究从未对其模型进行几何验证。本研究的目的是对使用主流桌面 3D 打印机打印的小儿上呼吸道模型进行几何验证。方法对一名 10 个月大女性的头部计算机断层扫描(CT)结果进行气道和周围解剖结构的分割。气道分割后可对其进行测量,以便与打印模型进行进一步比较。对头部进行分割后,就可以创建可打印的三维体积文件。为了对头部模型进行几何验证,后者接受了 CT 扫描。在打印模型上也进行了类似的分割工作,以便进行比较。在对原始模型和打印模型进行手动对齐后,计算了原始婴儿体积和打印模型之间的重叠比例以及平均豪斯多夫距离。结果小儿和打印模型上气道的体积分别为 12.31 立方厘米和 12.32 立方厘米(相差 0.08%)。原始模型和印刷模型的骰子系数为 0.92。结论桌面主流三维打印机可以生成具有高尺寸精度的儿科上气道模型,我们的综合几何验证也证明了这一点。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Geometric validation of a pediatric upper airways model made using a mainstream desktop 3D printer

Background

Three-dimensional (3D) printing has become increasingly affordable. Several research projects used 3D printing to create in vitro upper airways model. However, studies using a mainstream desktop 3D printer never performed geometric validation of their model. The aim of this study was to perform geometric validation of a pediatric upper airways model printed with a mainstream desktop 3D printer.

Methods

Head computerized tomography (CT) scan of a 10-month-old female underwent segmentation between airways and surrounding anatomical structures. Airways segmentation allowed their measurement for further comparison with printed model. Head segmentation enabled the creation of a 3D printable volume file. To proceed to the geometric validation of the head model, the latter underwent a CT scan. Similar segmentation work was performed on the printed model for comparison. Overlap proportion between the original infant volume and the printed model as well as an average Hausdorff distance were calculated after manual alignment between the original and printed model.

Results

Volumes were 12.31 cm3 and 12.32 cm3 for the pediatric and the printed model upper airways, respectively (0.08% difference). Dice coefficient of original and printed model was 0.92. The average Hausdorff distance was 0.21 mm.

Conclusion

Desktop mainstream 3D printers can generate pediatric upper airway model with a high dimensional accuracy, as evidenced by our comprehensive geometrical validation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Annals of 3D printed medicine
Annals of 3D printed medicine Medicine and Dentistry (General), Materials Science (General)
CiteScore
4.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
131 days
期刊最新文献
A novel approach to hallucal sesamoid pathology utilizing a 3D printed patient specific total sesamoid replacement implant: Case series Selective laser sintering at the Point-of-Care 3D printing laboratory in hospitals for cranio-maxillo-facial surgery: A further step into industrial additive manufacturing made available to clinicians Editorial Board Contents 3D-printed β-TCP/Ti6Al4V composite scaffolds for bone regeneration: Process parameter optimization and evaluation
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1