年轻司机在环形交叉道上使用手机的间隙接受行为和碰撞风险:随机参数生存模型

IF 5.7 1区 工程技术 Q1 ERGONOMICS Accident; analysis and prevention Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720
Esther Memeh , Yasir Ali , Francisco Javier Rubio , Craig Hancock , Md Mazharul Haque
{"title":"年轻司机在环形交叉道上使用手机的间隙接受行为和碰撞风险:随机参数生存模型","authors":"Esther Memeh ,&nbsp;Yasir Ali ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Rubio ,&nbsp;Craig Hancock ,&nbsp;Md Mazharul Haque","doi":"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Navigating through complex road geometries, such as roundabouts, poses significant challenges and safety risks for drivers. These challenges may be exacerbated when drivers are distracted by mobile phone conversations. The interplay of road geometry, driving state, and driver characteristics in creating compound risks remains an underexplored area in existing literature. Proper understanding of such compound crash risk is not only crucial to improve road geometric design but also to educate young drivers, who are particularly risk-takers and to devise strict penalties for mobile phone usage whilst driving. To fill this gap, this study examines crash risks associated with gap acceptance manoeuvres at roundabouts in the simulated environment of the CARRS-Q driving simulators, where 32 licenced young drivers were exposed to a gap acceptance scenario in three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), handheld, and hands-free. A parametric random parameters survival modelling approach is adopted to understand safety margins—characterised by gap times—during gap acceptance scenarios at roundabouts, concurrently uncover driver-level heterogeneity with mobile phone distraction and capture repeated measures of experiment design. The model specification includes the handheld phone condition as a random parameter and hands-free phone condition, acceleration noise, gap size, crash history, and gender as non-random parameters. Results suggest that the majority of handheld distracted drivers have smaller safety margins, reflecting the negative consequences of engaging in handheld phone conversations. Interestingly, a group of drivers in the same handheld phone condition have been found to exhibit cautious/safer behaviour, as evidenced by longer gap times, reflecting their risk compensation behaviour. Female distracted drivers are also found to exhibit safer gap acceptance behaviour compared to distracted male drivers. The findings of this study shed light on the compound risk of mobile phone distraction and gap acceptance at roundabouts, requiring policymakers and authorities to devise strict penalties and laws for distracted driving.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":6926,"journal":{"name":"Accident; analysis and prevention","volume":"206 ","pages":"Article 107720"},"PeriodicalIF":5.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002653/pdfft?md5=99419d3630030cf2700befd259dc9772&pid=1-s2.0-S0001457524002653-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Gap acceptance behaviour and crash risks of mobile phone distracted young drivers at roundabouts: A random parameters survival model\",\"authors\":\"Esther Memeh ,&nbsp;Yasir Ali ,&nbsp;Francisco Javier Rubio ,&nbsp;Craig Hancock ,&nbsp;Md Mazharul Haque\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.aap.2024.107720\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Navigating through complex road geometries, such as roundabouts, poses significant challenges and safety risks for drivers. These challenges may be exacerbated when drivers are distracted by mobile phone conversations. The interplay of road geometry, driving state, and driver characteristics in creating compound risks remains an underexplored area in existing literature. Proper understanding of such compound crash risk is not only crucial to improve road geometric design but also to educate young drivers, who are particularly risk-takers and to devise strict penalties for mobile phone usage whilst driving. To fill this gap, this study examines crash risks associated with gap acceptance manoeuvres at roundabouts in the simulated environment of the CARRS-Q driving simulators, where 32 licenced young drivers were exposed to a gap acceptance scenario in three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), handheld, and hands-free. A parametric random parameters survival modelling approach is adopted to understand safety margins—characterised by gap times—during gap acceptance scenarios at roundabouts, concurrently uncover driver-level heterogeneity with mobile phone distraction and capture repeated measures of experiment design. The model specification includes the handheld phone condition as a random parameter and hands-free phone condition, acceleration noise, gap size, crash history, and gender as non-random parameters. Results suggest that the majority of handheld distracted drivers have smaller safety margins, reflecting the negative consequences of engaging in handheld phone conversations. Interestingly, a group of drivers in the same handheld phone condition have been found to exhibit cautious/safer behaviour, as evidenced by longer gap times, reflecting their risk compensation behaviour. Female distracted drivers are also found to exhibit safer gap acceptance behaviour compared to distracted male drivers. The findings of this study shed light on the compound risk of mobile phone distraction and gap acceptance at roundabouts, requiring policymakers and authorities to devise strict penalties and laws for distracted driving.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":6926,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"volume\":\"206 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107720\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":5.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002653/pdfft?md5=99419d3630030cf2700befd259dc9772&pid=1-s2.0-S0001457524002653-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Accident; analysis and prevention\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002653\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ERGONOMICS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Accident; analysis and prevention","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0001457524002653","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ERGONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在复杂的道路几何形状(如环岛)中导航,给驾驶员带来了巨大的挑战和安全风险。当驾驶员因手机通话而分心时,这些挑战可能会更加严峻。在现有文献中,道路几何形状、驾驶状态和驾驶员特征在造成复合风险方面的相互作用仍是一个未充分探索的领域。正确理解这种复合碰撞风险不仅对改进道路几何设计至关重要,而且对教育年轻驾驶员(尤其是风险承担者)和制定针对驾驶时使用手机的严格处罚措施也至关重要。为了填补这一空白,本研究在 CARRS-Q 驾驶模拟器的模拟环境中,对 32 名持有驾照的年轻驾驶员在三种手机使用条件下的环岛间隙接受操作相关的碰撞风险进行了研究:基线(不通话)、手持和免提。采用参数随机参数生存建模法来了解环岛间隙接受情景中以间隙时间为特征的安全裕度,同时揭示驾驶员层面与手机分心的异质性,并捕捉实验设计的重复测量。模型规格包括作为随机参数的手持手机条件和作为非随机参数的免提手机条件、加速噪声、间隙大小、碰撞历史和性别。结果表明,大多数手持电话分心的驾驶员的安全系数较小,这反映了手持电话交谈的负面影响。有趣的是,在相同的手持电话条件下,一组驾驶员表现出谨慎/更安全的行为,表现为更长的间隙时间,这反映了他们的风险补偿行为。与分心的男性驾驶员相比,分心的女性驾驶员也表现出更安全的间隙接受行为。本研究的结果揭示了在环岛中手机分心和接受间隙的复合风险,要求政策制定者和当局针对分心驾驶制定严格的惩罚措施和法律。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Gap acceptance behaviour and crash risks of mobile phone distracted young drivers at roundabouts: A random parameters survival model

Navigating through complex road geometries, such as roundabouts, poses significant challenges and safety risks for drivers. These challenges may be exacerbated when drivers are distracted by mobile phone conversations. The interplay of road geometry, driving state, and driver characteristics in creating compound risks remains an underexplored area in existing literature. Proper understanding of such compound crash risk is not only crucial to improve road geometric design but also to educate young drivers, who are particularly risk-takers and to devise strict penalties for mobile phone usage whilst driving. To fill this gap, this study examines crash risks associated with gap acceptance manoeuvres at roundabouts in the simulated environment of the CARRS-Q driving simulators, where 32 licenced young drivers were exposed to a gap acceptance scenario in three phone conditions: baseline (no phone conversation), handheld, and hands-free. A parametric random parameters survival modelling approach is adopted to understand safety margins—characterised by gap times—during gap acceptance scenarios at roundabouts, concurrently uncover driver-level heterogeneity with mobile phone distraction and capture repeated measures of experiment design. The model specification includes the handheld phone condition as a random parameter and hands-free phone condition, acceleration noise, gap size, crash history, and gender as non-random parameters. Results suggest that the majority of handheld distracted drivers have smaller safety margins, reflecting the negative consequences of engaging in handheld phone conversations. Interestingly, a group of drivers in the same handheld phone condition have been found to exhibit cautious/safer behaviour, as evidenced by longer gap times, reflecting their risk compensation behaviour. Female distracted drivers are also found to exhibit safer gap acceptance behaviour compared to distracted male drivers. The findings of this study shed light on the compound risk of mobile phone distraction and gap acceptance at roundabouts, requiring policymakers and authorities to devise strict penalties and laws for distracted driving.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
11.90
自引率
16.90%
发文量
264
审稿时长
48 days
期刊介绍: Accident Analysis & Prevention provides wide coverage of the general areas relating to accidental injury and damage, including the pre-injury and immediate post-injury phases. Published papers deal with medical, legal, economic, educational, behavioral, theoretical or empirical aspects of transportation accidents, as well as with accidents at other sites. Selected topics within the scope of the Journal may include: studies of human, environmental and vehicular factors influencing the occurrence, type and severity of accidents and injury; the design, implementation and evaluation of countermeasures; biomechanics of impact and human tolerance limits to injury; modelling and statistical analysis of accident data; policy, planning and decision-making in safety.
期刊最新文献
Why they take the risk to perform a direct left turn at intersections: A data-driven framework for cyclist violation modeling. Assessing the safety impacts of winter road maintenance operations using connected vehicle data Partially constrained latent class analysis of highway crash injury severities: Investigating discrete spatial heterogeneity from regional data sources Recognizing and explaining driving stress using a Shapley additive explanation model by fusing EEG and behavior signals Study on optimization design of guide signs in dense interchange sections of eight-lane freeway
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1