Ángela María Londoño-García , María Fernanda Suárez-Giraldo , Lina María Colmenares-Roldán , Juliana Madrigal-Cadavid , Jorge Estrada , Paulo Giraldo , Daniel Jaramillo-Arroyave
{"title":"能否优化银屑病患者的生物疗法?","authors":"Ángela María Londoño-García , María Fernanda Suárez-Giraldo , Lina María Colmenares-Roldán , Juliana Madrigal-Cadavid , Jorge Estrada , Paulo Giraldo , Daniel Jaramillo-Arroyave","doi":"10.1016/j.rcreue.2022.10.005","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Introduction/Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients in clinical remission of psoriasis for at least for one year, who maintained therapeutic goals after initiating optimization of biologic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A descriptive, observational study was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of moderate–severe psoriasis in treatment with biologic therapy who were started on optimization of biologic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 29 patients started therapeutic optimization, of these, 27 patients were in the target range with absolute PASI less than 3. Only one patient failed therapeutic optimization with final PASI 3.6 and there was a case of a patient who lost continuity of management due to an accident and had a final PASI 3.8. Most of the patients were male, with an average age of 53 years, married, employed, residing in urban areas, with psoriasis of more than ten years of evolution, without associated morbidities, and without previous biologic treatment, the most frequently used being etanercept and adalimumab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Optimizing biologic therapy in patients with moderate–severe psoriasis may be viable. We seek to share this experience to propose a protocol to reduce the possibility of adverse events due to the prolonged use of this type of therapy, preserving clinical response and reducing costs to the health system.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":101099,"journal":{"name":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","volume":"31 2","pages":"Pages 166-170"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Is it possible to optimize biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis?\",\"authors\":\"Ángela María Londoño-García , María Fernanda Suárez-Giraldo , Lina María Colmenares-Roldán , Juliana Madrigal-Cadavid , Jorge Estrada , Paulo Giraldo , Daniel Jaramillo-Arroyave\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.rcreue.2022.10.005\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Introduction/Objective</h3><p>The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients in clinical remission of psoriasis for at least for one year, who maintained therapeutic goals after initiating optimization of biologic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Materials and methods</h3><p>A descriptive, observational study was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of moderate–severe psoriasis in treatment with biologic therapy who were started on optimization of biologic therapy.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>A total of 29 patients started therapeutic optimization, of these, 27 patients were in the target range with absolute PASI less than 3. Only one patient failed therapeutic optimization with final PASI 3.6 and there was a case of a patient who lost continuity of management due to an accident and had a final PASI 3.8. Most of the patients were male, with an average age of 53 years, married, employed, residing in urban areas, with psoriasis of more than ten years of evolution, without associated morbidities, and without previous biologic treatment, the most frequently used being etanercept and adalimumab.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusion</h3><p>Optimizing biologic therapy in patients with moderate–severe psoriasis may be viable. We seek to share this experience to propose a protocol to reduce the possibility of adverse events due to the prolonged use of this type of therapy, preserving clinical response and reducing costs to the health system.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":101099,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)\",\"volume\":\"31 2\",\"pages\":\"Pages 166-170\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-04-01\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440524000591\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Revista Colombiana de Reumatología (English Edition)","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2444440524000591","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
导言/目的本研究的目的是评估银屑病临床缓解至少一年的患者在开始优化生物疗法后是否保持了治疗目标。只有一名患者治疗优化失败,最终 PASI 为 3.6,还有一名患者因意外失去了治疗的连续性,最终 PASI 为 3.8。大多数患者为男性,平均年龄 53 岁,已婚,有工作,居住在城市地区,银屑病病程超过 10 年,无相关疾病,既往未接受过生物制剂治疗,最常用的是依那西普(etanercept)和阿达木单抗。我们希望分享这一经验,提出一种方案,以减少因长期使用这种疗法而出现不良反应的可能性,保持临床反应,降低医疗系统的成本。
Is it possible to optimize biologic therapy in patients with psoriasis?
Introduction/Objective
The purpose of this study was to evaluate patients in clinical remission of psoriasis for at least for one year, who maintained therapeutic goals after initiating optimization of biologic therapy.
Materials and methods
A descriptive, observational study was conducted on patients with a diagnosis of moderate–severe psoriasis in treatment with biologic therapy who were started on optimization of biologic therapy.
Results
A total of 29 patients started therapeutic optimization, of these, 27 patients were in the target range with absolute PASI less than 3. Only one patient failed therapeutic optimization with final PASI 3.6 and there was a case of a patient who lost continuity of management due to an accident and had a final PASI 3.8. Most of the patients were male, with an average age of 53 years, married, employed, residing in urban areas, with psoriasis of more than ten years of evolution, without associated morbidities, and without previous biologic treatment, the most frequently used being etanercept and adalimumab.
Conclusion
Optimizing biologic therapy in patients with moderate–severe psoriasis may be viable. We seek to share this experience to propose a protocol to reduce the possibility of adverse events due to the prolonged use of this type of therapy, preserving clinical response and reducing costs to the health system.