负责任的融资和投资：环境、社会和治理 (ESG) 指标的确定、制定和评估

IF 3.3 2区社会学 Q2 ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES Sustainable Futures Pub Date : 2024-07-07 DOI:10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100246

Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq

{"title":"负责任的融资和投资：环境、社会和治理 (ESG) 指标的确定、制定和评估","authors":"Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq","doi":"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100246","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Globally, the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) movement is gaining significant attention. The existing frameworks need to be more standardized and applicable to socio-economic dynamics. A three-phased approach was developed comprised of a comprehensive review and a research survey involving 62 experts. The results showed that the environmental component is ≈5–14 % more important than the social and governance components. The design, operational life, and material sourcing are relatively more important (i.e., ≈14–20 %) than the project type. Risks related to water and air pollution are ≈34–38 % more important than solid wastes. This research offers insights into ESG criteria and metrics.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":34478,"journal":{"name":"Sustainable Futures","volume":"8 ","pages":"Article 100246"},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000960/pdfft?md5=f1432a3d67dde2891d792610dbfcf63d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824000960-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Responsible financing and investment: identification, development, and assessment of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics\",\"authors\":\"Haroon R. Mian, Kasun Hewage, Rehan Sadiq\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.sftr.2024.100246\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Globally, the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) movement is gaining significant attention. The existing frameworks need to be more standardized and applicable to socio-economic dynamics. A three-phased approach was developed comprised of a comprehensive review and a research survey involving 62 experts. The results showed that the environmental component is ≈5–14 % more important than the social and governance components. The design, operational life, and material sourcing are relatively more important (i.e., ≈14–20 %) than the project type. Risks related to water and air pollution are ≈34–38 % more important than solid wastes. This research offers insights into ESG criteria and metrics.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":34478,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"volume\":\"8 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100246\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.3000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000960/pdfft?md5=f1432a3d67dde2891d792610dbfcf63d&pid=1-s2.0-S2666188824000960-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Sustainable Futures\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000960\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Sustainable Futures","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2666188824000960","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENVIRONMENTAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}

引用次数: 0

摘要

在全球范围内，环境、社会和治理（ESG）运动正获得极大关注。现有框架需要更加标准化，并适用于社会经济动态。我们制定了一种三阶段方法，包括全面审查和 62 位专家参与的研究调查。结果表明，环境因素比社会和治理因素重要≈5-14%。与项目类型相比，设计、运行寿命和材料来源相对更重要（即≈14-20%）。与固体废物相比，与水和空气污染相关的风险≈34-38%。这项研究提供了对环境、社会和治理标准和指标的见解。

本文章由计算机程序翻译，如有差异，请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文

微信好友朋友圈 QQ好友复制链接

本刊更多论文

Responsible financing and investment: identification, development, and assessment of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) metrics

Globally, the Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) movement is gaining significant attention. The existing frameworks need to be more standardized and applicable to socio-economic dynamics. A three-phased approach was developed comprised of a comprehensive review and a research survey involving 62 experts. The results showed that the environmental component is ≈5–14 % more important than the social and governance components. The design, operational life, and material sourcing are relatively more important (i.e., ≈14–20 %) than the project type. Risks related to water and air pollution are ≈34–38 % more important than solid wastes. This research offers insights into ESG criteria and metrics.

求助全文

通过发布文献求助，成功后即可免费获取论文全文。去求助

来源期刊

Sustainable Futures Social Sciences-Sociology and Political Science

CiteScore

9.30

自引率

1.80%

发文量

审稿时长

71 days

期刊介绍： Sustainable Futures: is a journal focused on the intersection of sustainability, environment and technology from various disciplines in social sciences, and their larger implications for corporation, government, education institutions, regions and society both at present and in the future. It provides an advanced platform for studies related to sustainability and sustainable development in society, economics, environment, and culture. The scope of the journal is broad and encourages interdisciplinary research, as well as welcoming theoretical and practical research from all methodological approaches.