实验性蜂胶牙膏对牙本质过敏症的疗效:随机临床试验

IF 2.2 4区 医学 Q2 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL International Journal of Clinical Practice Pub Date : 2024-07-17 DOI:10.1155/2024/8563084
Elma Vieira Takeuchi, Alexandra Melo Pingarilho Carneiro, Brennda Lucy Freitas de Paula, Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira, Antônia Patricia Oliveira Barros, Cecy Martins Silva
{"title":"实验性蜂胶牙膏对牙本质过敏症的疗效:随机临床试验","authors":"Elma Vieira Takeuchi,&nbsp;Alexandra Melo Pingarilho Carneiro,&nbsp;Brennda Lucy Freitas de Paula,&nbsp;Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira,&nbsp;Antônia Patricia Oliveira Barros,&nbsp;Cecy Martins Silva","doi":"10.1155/2024/8563084","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div>\n <p><i>Background</i>. Propolis is a natural bee product that has garnered attention due to its harmlessness and numerous beneficial biological properties. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of toothpastes containing different concentrations of propolis (10% and 15%) on the control of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). <i>Methods</i>. From adults aged 18–40 years with DH, 66 teeth were randomly divided into 3 treatment groups as follows (<i>n</i> = 22): control (toothpaste without active ingredient), 10% propolis toothpaste, and 15% propolis toothpaste. DH was assessed thrice (baseline and 15 and 30 days after treatment) by tactile and evaporative stimuli using the visual analog scale. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests. A significance level of 5% was used in all analyses. <i>Results</i>. All the groups showed a reduction in DH during the study (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The experimental groups (10% and 15% propolis) showed significantly greater reduction in DH than the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) after 30 days of treatment; however, the experimental groups displayed similar results (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Toothpastes containing propolis at concentrations of 10% and 15% were equally effective in controlling DH, regardless of their concentration. <i>Trial Registration</i>. This trial is registered with NCT05083052. Date of registration: 19/10/2021.</p>\n </div>","PeriodicalId":13782,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-17","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8563084","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Efficacy of Experimental Propolis-Based Toothpastes on Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial\",\"authors\":\"Elma Vieira Takeuchi,&nbsp;Alexandra Melo Pingarilho Carneiro,&nbsp;Brennda Lucy Freitas de Paula,&nbsp;Roberta Pimentel de Oliveira,&nbsp;Antônia Patricia Oliveira Barros,&nbsp;Cecy Martins Silva\",\"doi\":\"10.1155/2024/8563084\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div>\\n <p><i>Background</i>. Propolis is a natural bee product that has garnered attention due to its harmlessness and numerous beneficial biological properties. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of toothpastes containing different concentrations of propolis (10% and 15%) on the control of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). <i>Methods</i>. From adults aged 18–40 years with DH, 66 teeth were randomly divided into 3 treatment groups as follows (<i>n</i> = 22): control (toothpaste without active ingredient), 10% propolis toothpaste, and 15% propolis toothpaste. DH was assessed thrice (baseline and 15 and 30 days after treatment) by tactile and evaporative stimuli using the visual analog scale. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests. A significance level of 5% was used in all analyses. <i>Results</i>. All the groups showed a reduction in DH during the study (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05). The experimental groups (10% and 15% propolis) showed significantly greater reduction in DH than the control group (<i>p</i> &lt; 0.05) after 30 days of treatment; however, the experimental groups displayed similar results (<i>p</i> &gt; 0.05). <i>Conclusion</i>. Toothpastes containing propolis at concentrations of 10% and 15% were equally effective in controlling DH, regardless of their concentration. <i>Trial Registration</i>. This trial is registered with NCT05083052. Date of registration: 19/10/2021.</p>\\n </div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":13782,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.2000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-17\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/epdf/10.1155/2024/8563084\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Clinical Practice\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8563084\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Clinical Practice","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1155/2024/8563084","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景。蜂胶是一种天然蜂产品,因其无毒无害和多种有益的生物特性而备受关注。这项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照临床试验旨在评估含有不同浓度蜂胶(10%和15%)的牙膏对控制牙本质过敏症(DH)的效果。试验方法从18-40岁患有牙本质过敏症的成年人中随机抽取66颗牙齿,分为以下3个治疗组(n = 22):对照组(不含活性成分的牙膏)、10%蜂胶牙膏和15%蜂胶牙膏。使用视觉模拟量表,通过触觉和蒸发刺激,对DH进行三次评估(基线、治疗后15天和30天)。数据采用弗里德曼检验和 Kruskal-Wallis 检验进行分析。所有分析的显著性水平均为 5%。结果在研究期间,所有组的 DH 都有所下降(p < 0.05)。治疗30天后,实验组(10%和15%蜂胶)的DH下降幅度明显高于对照组(p <0.05);然而,实验组显示出相似的结果(p >0.05)。结论含有10%和15%浓度蜂胶的牙膏对控制DH同样有效。试验注册。该试验已在 NCT05083052 上注册。注册日期:19/10/2021.
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。

摘要图片

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Efficacy of Experimental Propolis-Based Toothpastes on Dentin Hypersensitivity: A Randomized Clinical Trial

Background. Propolis is a natural bee product that has garnered attention due to its harmlessness and numerous beneficial biological properties. This randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial aimed to assess the effect of toothpastes containing different concentrations of propolis (10% and 15%) on the control of dentin hypersensitivity (DH). Methods. From adults aged 18–40 years with DH, 66 teeth were randomly divided into 3 treatment groups as follows (n = 22): control (toothpaste without active ingredient), 10% propolis toothpaste, and 15% propolis toothpaste. DH was assessed thrice (baseline and 15 and 30 days after treatment) by tactile and evaporative stimuli using the visual analog scale. Data were analyzed using Friedman and Kruskal–Wallis tests. A significance level of 5% was used in all analyses. Results. All the groups showed a reduction in DH during the study (p < 0.05). The experimental groups (10% and 15% propolis) showed significantly greater reduction in DH than the control group (p < 0.05) after 30 days of treatment; however, the experimental groups displayed similar results (p > 0.05). Conclusion. Toothpastes containing propolis at concentrations of 10% and 15% were equally effective in controlling DH, regardless of their concentration. Trial Registration. This trial is registered with NCT05083052. Date of registration: 19/10/2021.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
274
审稿时长
3-8 weeks
期刊介绍: IJCP is a general medical journal. IJCP gives special priority to work that has international appeal. IJCP publishes: Editorials. IJCP Editorials are commissioned. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Perspectives. Most IJCP Perspectives are commissioned. Example. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] Study design and interpretation. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Original data from clinical investigations. In particular: Primary research papers from RCTs, observational studies, epidemiological studies; pre-specified sub-analyses; pooled analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Meta-analyses. [Always peer reviewed] Systematic reviews. From October 2009, special priority will be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] Non-systematic/narrative reviews. From October 2009, reviews that are not systematic will be considered only if they include a discrete Methods section that must explicitly describe the authors'' approach. Special priority will, however, be given to systematic reviews. [Always peer reviewed] ''How to…'' papers. Example. [Always peer reviewed] Consensus statements. [Always peer reviewed] Short reports. [Always peer reviewed] Letters. [Peer reviewed at the editor''s discretion] International scope IJCP publishes work from investigators globally. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the UK. Around 30% of IJCP articles list an author from the USA or Canada. Around 45% of IJCP articles list an author from a European country that is not the UK. Around 15% of articles published in IJCP list an author from a country in the Asia-Pacific region.
期刊最新文献
A Cross-Sectional Study on Nurse-Parent Partnership in the Pediatric Intensive Care Units Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy Reduces Pain and Improves Internal Rotation after Arthroscopic Capsular Release: A Randomized Clinical Trial Why Some People Did Not Want to be Vaccinated against COVID-19? Analysis of Some Psychological Factors Connected with a Decision about Vaccination Predicting the Risk of Fundus Lesions in Systemic Lupus Erythematosus: A Nomogram Model Health Experts’ Perspectives on Barriers, Facilitators, and Needs for Improvement of Hospital Care in the Dying Phase
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1