非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗相关认知障碍的临床研究

IF 3.9 4区 医学 Q1 PSYCHIATRY World Journal of Psychiatry Pub Date : 2024-07-19 DOI:10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1062
Qiang-Li Wang, Hai-Yan Xu, Yi Wang, Yin-Ling Wang, Pei-Nan Lin, Zhong-Lei Chen
{"title":"非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者化疗相关认知障碍的临床研究","authors":"Qiang-Li Wang, Hai-Yan Xu, Yi Wang, Yin-Ling Wang, Pei-Nan Lin, Zhong-Lei Chen","doi":"10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1062","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"BACKGROUND\n Chemotherapy for malignant tumors can cause brain changes and cognitive impairment, leading to chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI). Current research on CICI has focused on breast cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Whether patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) undergoing chemotherapy have cognitive impairment has not been fully investigated.\n AIM\n To investigate whether NHL patients undergoing chemotherapy had cognitive impairments.\n METHODS\n The study included 100 NHL patients who were required to complete a comprehensive psychological scale including the Brief Psychiatric Examination Scale (MMSE) at two time points: before chemotherapy and within 2 wk of two chemotherapy courses. A language proficiency test (VFT), Symbol Number Pattern Test (SDMT), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Abbreviated Daily Cognition Scale (ECog-12), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, and Karnofsky Performance Status were used to assess cognitive changes before and after chemotherapy.\n RESULTS\n The VFT scores for before treatment (BT) and after treatment (AT) groups were 45.20 ± 15.62, and 42.30 ± 17.53, respectively (t -2.16, P < 0.05). The CDT scores were 8 (3.5-9.25) for BT and 7 (2.5-9) for AT groups (Z -2.1, P < 0.05). Retrospective memory scores were 13.5 (9-17) for BT and 15 (13-18) for AT (Z -3.7, P < 0.01). The prospective memory scores were 12.63 ± 3.61 for BT and 14.43 ± 4.32 for AT groups (t -4.97, P < 0.01). The ECog-12 scores were 1.71 (1.25-2.08) for BT and 1.79 (1.42-2.08) for AT groups (Z -2.84, P < 0.01). The SDMT and MMSE values did not show a significant difference between BT and AT groups.\n CONCLUSION\n Compared to the AT group, the BT group showed impaired language, memory, and subjective cognition, but objective cognition and execution were not significantly affected.","PeriodicalId":23896,"journal":{"name":"World Journal of Psychiatry","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Clinical study of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma\",\"authors\":\"Qiang-Li Wang, Hai-Yan Xu, Yi Wang, Yin-Ling Wang, Pei-Nan Lin, Zhong-Lei Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1062\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"BACKGROUND\\n Chemotherapy for malignant tumors can cause brain changes and cognitive impairment, leading to chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI). Current research on CICI has focused on breast cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Whether patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) undergoing chemotherapy have cognitive impairment has not been fully investigated.\\n AIM\\n To investigate whether NHL patients undergoing chemotherapy had cognitive impairments.\\n METHODS\\n The study included 100 NHL patients who were required to complete a comprehensive psychological scale including the Brief Psychiatric Examination Scale (MMSE) at two time points: before chemotherapy and within 2 wk of two chemotherapy courses. A language proficiency test (VFT), Symbol Number Pattern Test (SDMT), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Abbreviated Daily Cognition Scale (ECog-12), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, and Karnofsky Performance Status were used to assess cognitive changes before and after chemotherapy.\\n RESULTS\\n The VFT scores for before treatment (BT) and after treatment (AT) groups were 45.20 ± 15.62, and 42.30 ± 17.53, respectively (t -2.16, P < 0.05). The CDT scores were 8 (3.5-9.25) for BT and 7 (2.5-9) for AT groups (Z -2.1, P < 0.05). Retrospective memory scores were 13.5 (9-17) for BT and 15 (13-18) for AT (Z -3.7, P < 0.01). The prospective memory scores were 12.63 ± 3.61 for BT and 14.43 ± 4.32 for AT groups (t -4.97, P < 0.01). The ECog-12 scores were 1.71 (1.25-2.08) for BT and 1.79 (1.42-2.08) for AT groups (Z -2.84, P < 0.01). The SDMT and MMSE values did not show a significant difference between BT and AT groups.\\n CONCLUSION\\n Compared to the AT group, the BT group showed impaired language, memory, and subjective cognition, but objective cognition and execution were not significantly affected.\",\"PeriodicalId\":23896,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"World Journal of Psychiatry\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-19\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"World Journal of Psychiatry\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1062\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"PSYCHIATRY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"World Journal of Psychiatry","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5498/wjp.v14.i7.1062","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"PSYCHIATRY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景 对恶性肿瘤的化疗可引起脑部变化和认知障碍,导致化疗引起的认知障碍(CICI)。目前对 CICI 的研究主要集中在乳腺癌和霍奇金淋巴瘤。至于接受化疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤(NHL)患者是否会出现认知障碍,目前尚未进行全面研究。目的 研究接受化疗的非霍奇金淋巴瘤患者是否存在认知障碍。方法 该研究纳入了 100 名 NHL 患者,要求他们在两个时间点(化疗前和两个化疗疗程后的两周内)完成包括简明精神病学检查量表(MMSE)在内的综合心理量表。语言能力测试(VFT)、符号数字模式测试(SDMT)、时钟绘图测试(CDT)、简短日常认知量表(ECog-12)、前瞻性和回顾性记忆问卷以及卡诺夫斯基表现状态用于评估化疗前后的认知变化。结果 治疗前(BT)组和治疗后(AT)组的 VFT 评分分别为(45.20 ± 15.62)和(42.30 ± 17.53)(t -2.16,P < 0.05)。BT 组的 CDT 得分为 8(3.5-9.25),AT 组的 CDT 得分为 7(2.5-9)(Z -2.1,P <0.05)。BT 组的回顾性记忆得分为 13.5(9-17)分,AT 组为 15(13-18)分(Z -3.7,P <0.01)。BT 组和 AT 组的前瞻性记忆得分分别为(12.63 ± 3.61)和(14.43 ± 4.32)(t -4.97,P <0.01)。BT组的ECog-12评分为1.71(1.25-2.08),AT组为1.79(1.42-2.08)(Z -2.84,P < 0.01)。BT组和AT组的SDMT和MMSE值无明显差异。结论 与 AT 组相比,BT 组的语言、记忆和主观认知能力受损,但客观认知能力和执行力并未受到明显影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Clinical study of chemotherapy-related cognitive impairment in patients with non-Hodgkin lymphoma
BACKGROUND Chemotherapy for malignant tumors can cause brain changes and cognitive impairment, leading to chemotherapy-induced cognitive impairment (CICI). Current research on CICI has focused on breast cancer and Hodgkin’s lymphoma. Whether patients with non-Hodgkin’s lymphoma (NHL) undergoing chemotherapy have cognitive impairment has not been fully investigated. AIM To investigate whether NHL patients undergoing chemotherapy had cognitive impairments. METHODS The study included 100 NHL patients who were required to complete a comprehensive psychological scale including the Brief Psychiatric Examination Scale (MMSE) at two time points: before chemotherapy and within 2 wk of two chemotherapy courses. A language proficiency test (VFT), Symbol Number Pattern Test (SDMT), Clock Drawing Test (CDT), Abbreviated Daily Cognition Scale (ECog-12), Prospective and Retrospective Memory Questionnaire, and Karnofsky Performance Status were used to assess cognitive changes before and after chemotherapy. RESULTS The VFT scores for before treatment (BT) and after treatment (AT) groups were 45.20 ± 15.62, and 42.30 ± 17.53, respectively (t -2.16, P < 0.05). The CDT scores were 8 (3.5-9.25) for BT and 7 (2.5-9) for AT groups (Z -2.1, P < 0.05). Retrospective memory scores were 13.5 (9-17) for BT and 15 (13-18) for AT (Z -3.7, P < 0.01). The prospective memory scores were 12.63 ± 3.61 for BT and 14.43 ± 4.32 for AT groups (t -4.97, P < 0.01). The ECog-12 scores were 1.71 (1.25-2.08) for BT and 1.79 (1.42-2.08) for AT groups (Z -2.84, P < 0.01). The SDMT and MMSE values did not show a significant difference between BT and AT groups. CONCLUSION Compared to the AT group, the BT group showed impaired language, memory, and subjective cognition, but objective cognition and execution were not significantly affected.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
6.50%
发文量
110
期刊介绍: The World Journal of Psychiatry (WJP) is a high-quality, peer reviewed, open-access journal. The primary task of WJP is to rapidly publish high-quality original articles, reviews, editorials, and case reports in the field of psychiatry. In order to promote productive academic communication, the peer review process for the WJP is transparent; to this end, all published manuscripts are accompanied by the anonymized reviewers’ comments as well as the authors’ responses. The primary aims of the WJP are to improve diagnostic, therapeutic and preventive modalities and the skills of clinicians and to guide clinical practice in psychiatry.
期刊最新文献
Alzheimer's disease with depressive symptoms: Clinical effect of intermittent theta burst stimulation repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation. Botulinum toxin type A-targeted SPP1 contributes to neuropathic pain by the activation of microglia pyroptosis. Challenges and prospects in bridging precision medicine and artificial intelligence in genomic psychiatric treatment. Cognitive impairment in patients with bipolar disorder alone versus those with bipolar disorder comorbid with borderline personality disorder. Correlation between psychological traits and the use of smart medical services in young and middle-aged adults: An observational study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1