质量保证机制在促进坦桑尼亚大学遵纪守法方面的实用性

Daudi Mrema, Irénée Ndayambaje, Philothère Ntawiha, Eugene Ndabaga
{"title":"质量保证机制在促进坦桑尼亚大学遵纪守法方面的实用性","authors":"Daudi Mrema, Irénée Ndayambaje, Philothère Ntawiha, Eugene Ndabaga","doi":"10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Compliance with any policies, laws and regulations, including university compliance with quality assurance mechanisms globally, depends on the practicability of those mechanisms. Like other countries, Tanzania has quality assurance mechanisms that require universities to comply. However, the existing audit reports have shown non-compliance cases to such mechanisms. This study sought to explore the practicability of the existing quality assurance mechanisms in promoting universities’ compliance in Tanzania. The documentary reviews, interviews, and focus group discussions were used to collect data from the 4 universities and 46 students, academics, and quality assurance directors and officers as a sample size selected purposively. The data were analysed through content analysis. The findings revealed that the existing quality assurance mechanisms are generally practicable; however, there are quality assurance requirements with practicability challenges due to contextual factors. Such requirements include senior academics in administrative duties, academics’ promotion, academics’ recruitment, inclusive and participatory teaching approaches, requirements with extra financial costs, examination scripts’ marking, and invigilation restrictions. This study concludes that the practicability challenges of some quality assurance mechanisms are one reason for non-compliance cases at some Tanzanian universities. It recommends that key stakeholders be involved in establishing mechanisms, and all contextual factors must be addressed to enhance practicability.","PeriodicalId":37122,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Educational Research","volume":"24 21","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Practicability of Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Promoting Tanzanian Universities’ Compliance\",\"authors\":\"Daudi Mrema, Irénée Ndayambaje, Philothère Ntawiha, Eugene Ndabaga\",\"doi\":\"10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Compliance with any policies, laws and regulations, including university compliance with quality assurance mechanisms globally, depends on the practicability of those mechanisms. Like other countries, Tanzania has quality assurance mechanisms that require universities to comply. However, the existing audit reports have shown non-compliance cases to such mechanisms. This study sought to explore the practicability of the existing quality assurance mechanisms in promoting universities’ compliance in Tanzania. The documentary reviews, interviews, and focus group discussions were used to collect data from the 4 universities and 46 students, academics, and quality assurance directors and officers as a sample size selected purposively. The data were analysed through content analysis. The findings revealed that the existing quality assurance mechanisms are generally practicable; however, there are quality assurance requirements with practicability challenges due to contextual factors. Such requirements include senior academics in administrative duties, academics’ promotion, academics’ recruitment, inclusive and participatory teaching approaches, requirements with extra financial costs, examination scripts’ marking, and invigilation restrictions. This study concludes that the practicability challenges of some quality assurance mechanisms are one reason for non-compliance cases at some Tanzanian universities. It recommends that key stakeholders be involved in establishing mechanisms, and all contextual factors must be addressed to enhance practicability.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37122,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"European Journal of Educational Research\",\"volume\":\"24 21\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"European Journal of Educational Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Educational Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12973/eu-jer.13.3.1139","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

遵守任何政策、法律和法规,包括大学遵守全球质量保证机制,都取决于这些机制是否切实可行。与其他国家一样,坦桑尼亚也有要求大学遵守的质量保证机制。然而,现有的审计报告显示存在不遵守这些机制的情况。本研究旨在探讨现有质量保证机制在促进坦桑尼亚各大学遵守规定方面的实用性。研究采用了文件审查、访谈和焦点小组讨论等方法,从 4 所大学和 46 名学生、学者、质量保证主管和官员中收集数据,并有目的地进行抽样调查。通过内容分析对数据进行了分析。研究结果表明,现有的质量保证机制总体上切实可行,但由于环境因素,一些质量保证要求在实用性方面存在挑战。这些要求包括担任行政职务的资深学者、学者晋升、学者招聘、包容性和参与性教学方法、需要额外财务成本的要求、考试阅卷和监考限制。本研究得出结论,一些质量保证机制的实用性挑战是坦桑尼亚一些大学出现违规案例的原因之一。研究建议,关键利益相关者应参与机制的建立,而且必须解决所有背景因素,以提高实用性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Practicability of Quality Assurance Mechanisms in Promoting Tanzanian Universities’ Compliance
Compliance with any policies, laws and regulations, including university compliance with quality assurance mechanisms globally, depends on the practicability of those mechanisms. Like other countries, Tanzania has quality assurance mechanisms that require universities to comply. However, the existing audit reports have shown non-compliance cases to such mechanisms. This study sought to explore the practicability of the existing quality assurance mechanisms in promoting universities’ compliance in Tanzania. The documentary reviews, interviews, and focus group discussions were used to collect data from the 4 universities and 46 students, academics, and quality assurance directors and officers as a sample size selected purposively. The data were analysed through content analysis. The findings revealed that the existing quality assurance mechanisms are generally practicable; however, there are quality assurance requirements with practicability challenges due to contextual factors. Such requirements include senior academics in administrative duties, academics’ promotion, academics’ recruitment, inclusive and participatory teaching approaches, requirements with extra financial costs, examination scripts’ marking, and invigilation restrictions. This study concludes that the practicability challenges of some quality assurance mechanisms are one reason for non-compliance cases at some Tanzanian universities. It recommends that key stakeholders be involved in establishing mechanisms, and all contextual factors must be addressed to enhance practicability.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Educational Research
European Journal of Educational Research Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
184
审稿时长
4 weeks
期刊最新文献
Turkish Language Teachers' Perspectives on Listening Skills Education in Turkey and Northern Cyprus Examining the Conceptual and Procedural Knowledge of Decimal Numbers in Sixth-Grade Elementary School Students An Integrated Framework of Online Learning Effectiveness in Institutions of Higher Learning A Comprehensive Systematic Review on the Multifaceted Factors Influencing Teacher Flourishing Bibliometric Analysis of Research Developments on Differentiated Instruction
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1