贝泊他汀和阿拉法丁外用药对虹膜炎患者的疗效比较

Neha Yadav, S. Sachdeva, Manisha Rathi, Sonia Chhabra, Shreay Vashisth, Dinkar Yadav
{"title":"贝泊他汀和阿拉法丁外用药对虹膜炎患者的疗效比较","authors":"Neha Yadav, S. Sachdeva, Manisha Rathi, Sonia Chhabra, Shreay Vashisth, Dinkar Yadav","doi":"10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To compare efficacy of bepotastine besilate (1.5%) versus alcaftadine (0.25%) in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.This comparative, randomized, single-blind and prospective study was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with VKC, who were allocated to receive either of the two treatment groups. Group A received Alcaftdine eye drops once daily, while Group B received bepotastine besilate twice daily for 8 weeks. The efficacy assessment was done at baseline and then at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment using following parameters - Primary endpoints included clinical symptoms score and clinical signs score and secondary endpoint included upper tarsal conjunctival brush cytology for eosinophil count.Intra-group analysis of clinical symptoms and clinical signs score showed statistically significant reduction in both scores and eosionophil count when compared to baseline values with both the drugs. On inter-group analysis, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in reduction in clinical symptoms and clinical signs score and eosinophil count. This study concluded that both drugs proved equally efficacious in relieving signs and symptoms of VKC. Difference in improvement of signs, symptoms, eosinophil count between both the groups drugs was not statistically significant.","PeriodicalId":13485,"journal":{"name":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of efficacy of topical bepotastine besilate and alcaftadine in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis\",\"authors\":\"Neha Yadav, S. Sachdeva, Manisha Rathi, Sonia Chhabra, Shreay Vashisth, Dinkar Yadav\",\"doi\":\"10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To compare efficacy of bepotastine besilate (1.5%) versus alcaftadine (0.25%) in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.This comparative, randomized, single-blind and prospective study was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with VKC, who were allocated to receive either of the two treatment groups. Group A received Alcaftdine eye drops once daily, while Group B received bepotastine besilate twice daily for 8 weeks. The efficacy assessment was done at baseline and then at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment using following parameters - Primary endpoints included clinical symptoms score and clinical signs score and secondary endpoint included upper tarsal conjunctival brush cytology for eosinophil count.Intra-group analysis of clinical symptoms and clinical signs score showed statistically significant reduction in both scores and eosionophil count when compared to baseline values with both the drugs. On inter-group analysis, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in reduction in clinical symptoms and clinical signs score and eosinophil count. This study concluded that both drugs proved equally efficacious in relieving signs and symptoms of VKC. Difference in improvement of signs, symptoms, eosinophil count between both the groups drugs was not statistically significant.\",\"PeriodicalId\":13485,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Indian Journal of Clinical and Experimental Ophthalmology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18231/j.ijceo.2024.057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

比较贝泊他汀(1.5%)与阿卡夫定(0.25%)对vernal角结膜炎患者的疗效。这项比较性、随机、单盲和前瞻性研究的对象是100名确诊为vernal角结膜炎的患者,他们被分配到两个治疗组中的任何一组。A 组每天滴一次阿卡夫定眼药水,B 组每天滴两次贝泊他定眼药水,疗程为 8 周。临床症状和临床体征评分的组内分析表明,与基线值相比,两种药物的临床症状和临床体征评分以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数均有统计学意义的显著降低。在组间分析中发现,两组在临床症状和临床体征评分以及嗜酸性粒细胞计数的减少方面没有明显的统计学差异。这项研究的结论是,两种药物在缓解 VKC 症状和体征方面的疗效相同。两组药物在改善体征、症状和嗜酸性粒细胞计数方面的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Comparison of efficacy of topical bepotastine besilate and alcaftadine in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis
To compare efficacy of bepotastine besilate (1.5%) versus alcaftadine (0.25%) in patients with vernal keratoconjunctivitis.This comparative, randomized, single-blind and prospective study was conducted on 100 patients diagnosed with VKC, who were allocated to receive either of the two treatment groups. Group A received Alcaftdine eye drops once daily, while Group B received bepotastine besilate twice daily for 8 weeks. The efficacy assessment was done at baseline and then at 4 and 8 weeks post-treatment using following parameters - Primary endpoints included clinical symptoms score and clinical signs score and secondary endpoint included upper tarsal conjunctival brush cytology for eosinophil count.Intra-group analysis of clinical symptoms and clinical signs score showed statistically significant reduction in both scores and eosionophil count when compared to baseline values with both the drugs. On inter-group analysis, it was found that there was no statistically significant difference between the two groups in reduction in clinical symptoms and clinical signs score and eosinophil count. This study concluded that both drugs proved equally efficacious in relieving signs and symptoms of VKC. Difference in improvement of signs, symptoms, eosinophil count between both the groups drugs was not statistically significant.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Oxidative stress in diabetic retinopathy and diabetic nephropathy Learning curve of resident performed phacoemulsification versus manual small incision cataract surgery at a regional ophthalmic institute in western India Dry eye in mask wearers among healthcare workers during COVID-19 pandemic Macular thickness comparison in type II diabetic patients using optical coherence tomography: A case control study Clinical profile and management of vernal keratoconjunctivitis in a tertiary health care center, North Karnataka
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1