西班牙事实核查机构在其 "WhatsApp "渠道上的传播战略

Alejandra Tirado García, Laura Alonso Muñoz
{"title":"西班牙事实核查机构在其 \"WhatsApp \"渠道上的传播战略","authors":"Alejandra Tirado García, Laura Alonso Muñoz","doi":"10.62008/ixc/14/02estrat","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The objective of this research is to understand the dissemination strategy employed by Spanish fact-checking agencies through their WhatsApp channels. Specifically, it analyses the theme and function of the publications, the type of misinformation verified, and the interaction and multimedia presence. Quantitative content analysis is used to analyse the 258 messages published by Newtral, Maldita, and EFE Verifica on their WhatsApp channels over two months. The results show some interesting findings. Firstly, it is noteworthy that Newtral and Maldita have a regular publication frequency, but not EFE Verifica. Secondly, the conflict between Israel and Palestine dominates a large portion of the verifications by Newtral and EFE Verifica. In contrast, Maldita focuses on informing about topics related to science and technology or politics. Thirdly, it is highlighted that only Maldita seeks to promote real interaction with users through reactions. These findings provide insights into the use of newly created WhatsApp channels by fact-checking agencies.","PeriodicalId":516608,"journal":{"name":"index.comunicación","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Dissemination strategy of spanish fact-checking agencies on their 'WhatsApp' channels\",\"authors\":\"Alejandra Tirado García, Laura Alonso Muñoz\",\"doi\":\"10.62008/ixc/14/02estrat\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The objective of this research is to understand the dissemination strategy employed by Spanish fact-checking agencies through their WhatsApp channels. Specifically, it analyses the theme and function of the publications, the type of misinformation verified, and the interaction and multimedia presence. Quantitative content analysis is used to analyse the 258 messages published by Newtral, Maldita, and EFE Verifica on their WhatsApp channels over two months. The results show some interesting findings. Firstly, it is noteworthy that Newtral and Maldita have a regular publication frequency, but not EFE Verifica. Secondly, the conflict between Israel and Palestine dominates a large portion of the verifications by Newtral and EFE Verifica. In contrast, Maldita focuses on informing about topics related to science and technology or politics. Thirdly, it is highlighted that only Maldita seeks to promote real interaction with users through reactions. These findings provide insights into the use of newly created WhatsApp channels by fact-checking agencies.\",\"PeriodicalId\":516608,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"index.comunicación\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"index.comunicación\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.62008/ixc/14/02estrat\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"index.comunicación","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.62008/ixc/14/02estrat","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究旨在了解西班牙事实核查机构通过 WhatsApp 渠道所采用的传播策略。具体来说,它分析了出版物的主题和功能、核实的错误信息类型以及互动和多媒体存在。文章采用定量内容分析法,对 Newtral、Maldita 和 EFE Verifica 两个月来在其 WhatsApp 频道上发布的 258 条信息进行了分析。结果显示了一些有趣的发现。首先,值得注意的是,Newtral 和 Maldita 有固定的发布频率,但 EFE Verifica 没有。其次,以色列和巴勒斯坦之间的冲突在 Newtral 和 EFE Verifica 的大部分核实信息中占主导地位。与此相反,Maldita 则侧重于报道与科技或政治相关的话题。第三,只有 Maldita 通过反应来促进与用户的真正互动。这些发现为事实核查机构使用新创建的 WhatsApp 频道提供了启示。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Dissemination strategy of spanish fact-checking agencies on their 'WhatsApp' channels
The objective of this research is to understand the dissemination strategy employed by Spanish fact-checking agencies through their WhatsApp channels. Specifically, it analyses the theme and function of the publications, the type of misinformation verified, and the interaction and multimedia presence. Quantitative content analysis is used to analyse the 258 messages published by Newtral, Maldita, and EFE Verifica on their WhatsApp channels over two months. The results show some interesting findings. Firstly, it is noteworthy that Newtral and Maldita have a regular publication frequency, but not EFE Verifica. Secondly, the conflict between Israel and Palestine dominates a large portion of the verifications by Newtral and EFE Verifica. In contrast, Maldita focuses on informing about topics related to science and technology or politics. Thirdly, it is highlighted that only Maldita seeks to promote real interaction with users through reactions. These findings provide insights into the use of newly created WhatsApp channels by fact-checking agencies.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Acusaciones de odio, prensa y elecciones en España (2004-2019) Disinformation and media trust in the south of Europe. A moderated mediation model Exposición selectiva, confianza en medios y tolerancia a compartir desinformación Plataformas de fact-checking y confianza: análisis de sus relaciones con las fuentes y audiencias La intersección de visibilidad web, IA, y monitoreo de noticias en el periodismo digital: el caso de los medios brasileños y españoles
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1