利用微型阿姆斯试验和气相色谱-质谱分析法研究阻隔层抑制回收低密度聚乙烯薄膜诱变作用的效果

IF 4.6 Q2 GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY Recycling Pub Date : 2024-07-15 DOI:10.3390/recycling9040057
Lukas Prielinger, S. Bandyopadhyay, Eva Ortner, Martin Novak, Tanja Radusin, Steffen Annfinsen, N. Sharmin, Bernhard Rainer, M. K. Pettersen
{"title":"利用微型阿姆斯试验和气相色谱-质谱分析法研究阻隔层抑制回收低密度聚乙烯薄膜诱变作用的效果","authors":"Lukas Prielinger, S. Bandyopadhyay, Eva Ortner, Martin Novak, Tanja Radusin, Steffen Annfinsen, N. Sharmin, Bernhard Rainer, M. K. Pettersen","doi":"10.3390/recycling9040057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"To fulfil the European Green Deal targets and implement a circular economy, there is an urgent need to increase recycling rates of packaging materials. However, before recycled materials can be used in food contact applications, they must meet high safety standards. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a worst-case scenario must be applied and unknown substances must be evaluated as being potentially genotoxic. The Ames test, which detects direct DNA-reactive effects, together with chromatographic analysis is very promising to complement risk assessment. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of functional barriers in ten different samples, including virgin and recycled LDPE foils. FT-IR analysis did not show major differences between virgin and recycled films. Light microscopy revealed differences in quality and an increased number of particles. GC-MS analysis detected and quantified 35 substances, including eight unknowns. Using a miniaturized version of the Ames test, four of ten samples tested positive in two individual migrates up to a dilution of 12.5%. All virgin LDPE materials tested negative; however, recycled material F showed an increased mutagenic activity, with an n-fold induction up to 28. Samples with functional barriers lowered migration and reduced mutagenicity. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to identify possible sources of contamination.","PeriodicalId":36729,"journal":{"name":"Recycling","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Investigation of the Effectiveness of Barrier Layers to Inhibit Mutagenic Effects of Recycled LDPE Films, Using a Miniaturized Ames Test and GC-MS Analysis\",\"authors\":\"Lukas Prielinger, S. Bandyopadhyay, Eva Ortner, Martin Novak, Tanja Radusin, Steffen Annfinsen, N. Sharmin, Bernhard Rainer, M. K. Pettersen\",\"doi\":\"10.3390/recycling9040057\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"To fulfil the European Green Deal targets and implement a circular economy, there is an urgent need to increase recycling rates of packaging materials. However, before recycled materials can be used in food contact applications, they must meet high safety standards. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a worst-case scenario must be applied and unknown substances must be evaluated as being potentially genotoxic. The Ames test, which detects direct DNA-reactive effects, together with chromatographic analysis is very promising to complement risk assessment. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of functional barriers in ten different samples, including virgin and recycled LDPE foils. FT-IR analysis did not show major differences between virgin and recycled films. Light microscopy revealed differences in quality and an increased number of particles. GC-MS analysis detected and quantified 35 substances, including eight unknowns. Using a miniaturized version of the Ames test, four of ten samples tested positive in two individual migrates up to a dilution of 12.5%. All virgin LDPE materials tested negative; however, recycled material F showed an increased mutagenic activity, with an n-fold induction up to 28. Samples with functional barriers lowered migration and reduced mutagenicity. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to identify possible sources of contamination.\",\"PeriodicalId\":36729,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Recycling\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Recycling\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling9040057\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Recycling","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3390/recycling9040057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GREEN & SUSTAINABLE SCIENCE & TECHNOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

为了实现欧洲绿色交易目标和实施循环经济,迫切需要提高包装材料的回收率。然而,在将回收材料用于食品接触应用之前,它们必须达到很高的安全标准。根据欧洲食品安全局(EFSA)的规定,必须采用最坏情况假设,并对未知物质的潜在遗传毒性进行评估。艾姆斯试验可检测直接的 DNA 反应效应,它与色谱分析相结合,很有希望对风险评估起到补充作用。本研究旨在评估功能性屏障在十种不同样品(包括原生和回收的低密度聚乙烯箔)中的有效性。傅立叶变换红外分析显示,原生薄膜和回收薄膜之间并无重大差异。光学显微镜显示出质量上的差异和颗粒数量的增加。气相色谱-质谱分析检测并量化了 35 种物质,包括 8 种未知物质。使用微型化的艾姆斯测试法,10 个样品中有 4 个在稀释到 12.5% 的两个迁移测试中呈阳性。所有原生低密度聚乙烯材料的测试结果均为阴性;但回收材料 F 的诱变活性有所提高,诱变倍数高达 28 倍。带有功能性屏障的样品降低了迁移性和诱变性。不过,还需要进一步调查,以确定可能的污染源。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Investigation of the Effectiveness of Barrier Layers to Inhibit Mutagenic Effects of Recycled LDPE Films, Using a Miniaturized Ames Test and GC-MS Analysis
To fulfil the European Green Deal targets and implement a circular economy, there is an urgent need to increase recycling rates of packaging materials. However, before recycled materials can be used in food contact applications, they must meet high safety standards. According to the European Food Safety Authority (EFSA), a worst-case scenario must be applied and unknown substances must be evaluated as being potentially genotoxic. The Ames test, which detects direct DNA-reactive effects, together with chromatographic analysis is very promising to complement risk assessment. This study aims to evaluate the effectiveness of functional barriers in ten different samples, including virgin and recycled LDPE foils. FT-IR analysis did not show major differences between virgin and recycled films. Light microscopy revealed differences in quality and an increased number of particles. GC-MS analysis detected and quantified 35 substances, including eight unknowns. Using a miniaturized version of the Ames test, four of ten samples tested positive in two individual migrates up to a dilution of 12.5%. All virgin LDPE materials tested negative; however, recycled material F showed an increased mutagenic activity, with an n-fold induction up to 28. Samples with functional barriers lowered migration and reduced mutagenicity. Nonetheless, further investigations are needed to identify possible sources of contamination.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Recycling
Recycling Environmental Science-Management, Monitoring, Policy and Law
CiteScore
6.80
自引率
7.00%
发文量
84
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Quality-Driven Allocation Method to Promote the Circular Economy for Plastic Components in the Automotive Industry Silicon Kerf Recovery via Acid Leaching Followed by Melting at Elevated Temperatures An Investigation into Sustainable Solutions: Utilizing Hydrated Lime Derived from Oyster Shells as an Eco-Friendly Alternative for Semiconductor Wastewater Treatment Environmental and Economic Forecast of the Widespread Use of Anaerobic Digestion Techniques Concentration of Silver from Recycling of Fine Powder of Wasted Videogame Printed Circuit Boards through Reverse Froth Flotation and Magnetic Separation Processes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1