从殖民秩序到非殖民化未来:巴布亚贝塞纳运动中的殖民模仿与身份认同

IF 0.4 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Oceania Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1002/ocea.5403
Ming‐Jen Wu
{"title":"从殖民秩序到非殖民化未来:巴布亚贝塞纳运动中的殖民模仿与身份认同","authors":"Ming‐Jen Wu","doi":"10.1002/ocea.5403","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"During the 1970s and 1980s, a nationalist movement called Papua Besena emerged in Papua New Guinea. On the one hand, the group believed that the Papuan people were neglected by Australian colonisation and campaigned for Papuan sovereignty, either by creating an independent state or joining Australia as a state. On the other hand, as some scholars and politicians have pointed out, Papua Besena's rhetoric of colonial neglect failed to appreciate that Papuan people received more investment in colonial economic development, training, and infrastructure than most Papua New Guineans due to their proximity to the colonial centre. The Australian colonisation of the territories also changed due to pressure from the United Nations visiting mission. Yet despite the Papuan people's access to development, they still felt neglected and humiliated being so close to the colonial centre. To answer this paradox, the concept of mimesis, particularly the idea of colonial mimicry and mimesis as a source of identity, might shed new light on the political history and consciousness of Papuans. This paper suggests that Papuans' access to space, training, and positions was restricted in and around Port Moresby. Many Papuans took up the colonial moral order and mimicked the colonial perspective visible in the capital, projecting it into their decolonial future and their relationships with New Guineans and Australia. In other words, the Papuans' proximity to the colonial space and process contributed to their experiences of neglect and their identity simultaneously.","PeriodicalId":46005,"journal":{"name":"Oceania","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"From Colonial Order to Decolonial Future: Colonial Mimesis and Identity among the Papua Besena Movement\",\"authors\":\"Ming‐Jen Wu\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/ocea.5403\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"During the 1970s and 1980s, a nationalist movement called Papua Besena emerged in Papua New Guinea. On the one hand, the group believed that the Papuan people were neglected by Australian colonisation and campaigned for Papuan sovereignty, either by creating an independent state or joining Australia as a state. On the other hand, as some scholars and politicians have pointed out, Papua Besena's rhetoric of colonial neglect failed to appreciate that Papuan people received more investment in colonial economic development, training, and infrastructure than most Papua New Guineans due to their proximity to the colonial centre. The Australian colonisation of the territories also changed due to pressure from the United Nations visiting mission. Yet despite the Papuan people's access to development, they still felt neglected and humiliated being so close to the colonial centre. To answer this paradox, the concept of mimesis, particularly the idea of colonial mimicry and mimesis as a source of identity, might shed new light on the political history and consciousness of Papuans. This paper suggests that Papuans' access to space, training, and positions was restricted in and around Port Moresby. Many Papuans took up the colonial moral order and mimicked the colonial perspective visible in the capital, projecting it into their decolonial future and their relationships with New Guineans and Australia. In other words, the Papuans' proximity to the colonial space and process contributed to their experiences of neglect and their identity simultaneously.\",\"PeriodicalId\":46005,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Oceania\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.4000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Oceania\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5403\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q3\",\"JCRName\":\"ANTHROPOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Oceania","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/ocea.5403","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

20 世纪 70 年代和 80 年代,巴布亚新几内亚出现了一个名为 "巴布亚贝塞纳"(Papua Besena)的民族主义运动。一方面,该组织认为巴布亚人民受到了澳大利亚殖民统治的忽视,并通过建立独立国家或加入澳大利亚作为一个国家来争取巴布亚主权。另一方面,正如一些学者和政治家所指出的,巴布亚-贝塞纳(Papua Besena)关于殖民忽视的言论没有认识到,巴布亚人民由于靠近殖民中心,在殖民经济发展、培训和基础设施建设方面比大多数巴布亚新几内亚人获得了更多的投资。迫于联合国视察团的压力,澳大利亚也改变了对巴布亚新几内亚的殖民统治。然而,尽管巴布亚新几内亚人民获得了发展机会,但他们仍然感到被忽视和屈辱,因为他们离殖民中心如此之近。为了回答这一悖论,"模仿 "的概念,尤其是殖民模仿和模仿作为身份来源的概念,可能会对巴布亚人的政治历史和意识产生新的启示。本文认为,巴布亚人在莫尔兹比港及其周边地区获得空间、培训和职位的机会受到了限制。许多巴布亚人接受了殖民地的道德秩序,模仿首都可见的殖民视角,将其投射到他们的非殖民化未来以及他们与新几内亚人和澳大利亚的关系中。换句话说,巴布亚人与殖民空间和殖民进程的接近同时促成了他们被忽视的经历和身份认同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
From Colonial Order to Decolonial Future: Colonial Mimesis and Identity among the Papua Besena Movement
During the 1970s and 1980s, a nationalist movement called Papua Besena emerged in Papua New Guinea. On the one hand, the group believed that the Papuan people were neglected by Australian colonisation and campaigned for Papuan sovereignty, either by creating an independent state or joining Australia as a state. On the other hand, as some scholars and politicians have pointed out, Papua Besena's rhetoric of colonial neglect failed to appreciate that Papuan people received more investment in colonial economic development, training, and infrastructure than most Papua New Guineans due to their proximity to the colonial centre. The Australian colonisation of the territories also changed due to pressure from the United Nations visiting mission. Yet despite the Papuan people's access to development, they still felt neglected and humiliated being so close to the colonial centre. To answer this paradox, the concept of mimesis, particularly the idea of colonial mimicry and mimesis as a source of identity, might shed new light on the political history and consciousness of Papuans. This paper suggests that Papuans' access to space, training, and positions was restricted in and around Port Moresby. Many Papuans took up the colonial moral order and mimicked the colonial perspective visible in the capital, projecting it into their decolonial future and their relationships with New Guineans and Australia. In other words, the Papuans' proximity to the colonial space and process contributed to their experiences of neglect and their identity simultaneously.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Oceania
Oceania ANTHROPOLOGY-
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
10.00%
发文量
23
期刊介绍: The Australian journal OCEANIA focuses on the study of indigenous peoples of Australia, Melanesia, Polynesia, Micronesia, and Southeast Asia. A recent issue includes articles on land wars, land utilization, and aboriginal self-determination. There are typically five articles per issue and six to ten book reviews. Occasionally, an issue is devoted to a single topic (Katz).
期刊最新文献
Haunting Biology: Science and Indigeneity in Australia. By Emma Kowal. Durham, NC, USA: Duke University Press. 2023. Pp: xv + 248. Price: US$27.95 and 104.95. From Colonial Order to Decolonial Future: Colonial Mimesis and Identity among the Papua Besena Movement How They Fought. Indigenous Tactics and Weaponry of Australia's Frontier Wars. By RayKerkhove. Tingalpa, AU: Boolarong Press. 2023. Pp: x + 420. Price: A$39.99 Frontier Narratives That Take on Flesh: Tracing Legacy, Labour, and Legitimacy in Outback Queensland, Australia The Wind Is Always Blowing: Generative Crosscurrents of Ethnographic Dialogue in Australia
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1