性别化的生活经验如何影响当代中国城市居民的性别偏好态度

IF 2.7 1区 社会学 Q1 FAMILY STUDIES Journal of Marriage and Family Pub Date : 2024-07-11 DOI:10.1111/jomf.13025
Yun Zhou
{"title":"性别化的生活经验如何影响当代中国城市居民的性别偏好态度","authors":"Yun Zhou","doi":"10.1111/jomf.13025","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article examines how gendered lived experiences—the constellation of women's quotidian, on‐the‐ground encounters and perceptions of gender inequality—shape highly educated women's sex preference attitudes in contemporary urban China.Recent theoretical developments highlight women's experiences and views of gender (in)equity as powerful forces that drive their fertility aspirations and behavior. Yet, extant research on sex preference has overwhelmingly focused on features of the patrilineal family institution and overlooked the role of gendered lived experiences.This study adopts a mixed‐methods approach, combining six waves of the nationally representative China General Social Survey (2010–2018) and 70 in‐depth interviews.Quantitative analysis found that compared to those with exclusive daughter preference, highly educated urban Chinese women who exclusively desired sons held similarly egalitarian views on gender. Qualitative analysis further demonstrated that invoking lived experiences of gender injustice, these women framed their son preference attitudes as “a mother's duty” of wanting to shield their children from gendered hardship. They viewed raising daughters amidst pervasive gender discriminations as emotionally taxing hard work. Meanwhile, such preference aligned with entrenched familial expectations that demanded male offspring, thereby holding behavioral implications for second‐birth outcomes.This study uncovers previously obscured reasonings—beyond the outright devaluation of girls—that undergird highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes.By unpacking how gendered lived experiences underpin the nuanced reasonings behind some highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes and the behavioral implications, this article joins the theoretical conversation that considers how gender egalitarians may perpetuate gender unequal outcomes.","PeriodicalId":48440,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Marriage and Family","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"How gendered lived experiences shape sex preference attitudes in contemporary urban China\",\"authors\":\"Yun Zhou\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/jomf.13025\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article examines how gendered lived experiences—the constellation of women's quotidian, on‐the‐ground encounters and perceptions of gender inequality—shape highly educated women's sex preference attitudes in contemporary urban China.Recent theoretical developments highlight women's experiences and views of gender (in)equity as powerful forces that drive their fertility aspirations and behavior. Yet, extant research on sex preference has overwhelmingly focused on features of the patrilineal family institution and overlooked the role of gendered lived experiences.This study adopts a mixed‐methods approach, combining six waves of the nationally representative China General Social Survey (2010–2018) and 70 in‐depth interviews.Quantitative analysis found that compared to those with exclusive daughter preference, highly educated urban Chinese women who exclusively desired sons held similarly egalitarian views on gender. Qualitative analysis further demonstrated that invoking lived experiences of gender injustice, these women framed their son preference attitudes as “a mother's duty” of wanting to shield their children from gendered hardship. They viewed raising daughters amidst pervasive gender discriminations as emotionally taxing hard work. Meanwhile, such preference aligned with entrenched familial expectations that demanded male offspring, thereby holding behavioral implications for second‐birth outcomes.This study uncovers previously obscured reasonings—beyond the outright devaluation of girls—that undergird highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes.By unpacking how gendered lived experiences underpin the nuanced reasonings behind some highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes and the behavioral implications, this article joins the theoretical conversation that considers how gender egalitarians may perpetuate gender unequal outcomes.\",\"PeriodicalId\":48440,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-11\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Marriage and Family\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"90\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13025\",\"RegionNum\":1,\"RegionCategory\":\"社会学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"FAMILY STUDIES\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Marriage and Family","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/jomf.13025","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"FAMILY STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文探讨了当代中国城市中受过高等教育的女性的性别偏好态度是如何形成的。最近的理论发展强调了女性的经历和对性别(不)公平的看法是推动她们生育愿望和行为的强大力量。本研究采用了一种混合方法,结合了六次具有全国代表性的中国社会概览(2010-2018 年)和 70 次深度访谈。定量分析发现,与那些只偏好女儿的女性相比,只想要儿子的受过高等教育的中国城市女性对性别持有类似的平等主义观点。定性分析进一步表明,这些女性援引性别不公的生活经验,将其重男轻女的态度归结为 "母亲的责任",即希望保护子女免受性别困境。她们认为,在普遍存在的性别歧视中抚养女儿是一项耗费情感的艰苦工作。同时,这种偏好与要求生育男性后代的根深蒂固的家庭期望相一致,从而对二胎生育结果产生了行为影响。本研究揭示了之前被掩盖的理由--除了对女孩的彻底贬低--这些理由支撑着受过高等教育的中国城市女性的重男轻女态度。通过解读一些受过高等教育的中国城市女性重男轻女态度背后的微妙原因及其行为影响,本文加入了理论对话,探讨性别平等主义者如何使性别不平等的结果永久化。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
How gendered lived experiences shape sex preference attitudes in contemporary urban China
This article examines how gendered lived experiences—the constellation of women's quotidian, on‐the‐ground encounters and perceptions of gender inequality—shape highly educated women's sex preference attitudes in contemporary urban China.Recent theoretical developments highlight women's experiences and views of gender (in)equity as powerful forces that drive their fertility aspirations and behavior. Yet, extant research on sex preference has overwhelmingly focused on features of the patrilineal family institution and overlooked the role of gendered lived experiences.This study adopts a mixed‐methods approach, combining six waves of the nationally representative China General Social Survey (2010–2018) and 70 in‐depth interviews.Quantitative analysis found that compared to those with exclusive daughter preference, highly educated urban Chinese women who exclusively desired sons held similarly egalitarian views on gender. Qualitative analysis further demonstrated that invoking lived experiences of gender injustice, these women framed their son preference attitudes as “a mother's duty” of wanting to shield their children from gendered hardship. They viewed raising daughters amidst pervasive gender discriminations as emotionally taxing hard work. Meanwhile, such preference aligned with entrenched familial expectations that demanded male offspring, thereby holding behavioral implications for second‐birth outcomes.This study uncovers previously obscured reasonings—beyond the outright devaluation of girls—that undergird highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes.By unpacking how gendered lived experiences underpin the nuanced reasonings behind some highly educated urban Chinese women's son preference attitudes and the behavioral implications, this article joins the theoretical conversation that considers how gender egalitarians may perpetuate gender unequal outcomes.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.20
自引率
6.70%
发文量
81
期刊介绍: For more than 70 years, Journal of Marriage and Family (JMF) has been a leading research journal in the family field. JMF features original research and theory, research interpretation and reviews, and critical discussion concerning all aspects of marriage, other forms of close relationships, and families.In 2009, an institutional subscription to Journal of Marriage and Family includes a subscription to Family Relations and Journal of Family Theory & Review.
期刊最新文献
Issue Information Introduction to mid-decade Special Issue on Theory and Methods Intersectional bonds: Delinquency, arrest, and changing family social capital during adolescence “Doing authority”: Stories of parental authority across three generations The ties that bind: Questions for studying families in neighborhood contexts
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1