为什么国际纵向专业化会影响中国企业内部的技能溢价?调查与解释

Bo Chen
{"title":"为什么国际纵向专业化会影响中国企业内部的技能溢价?调查与解释","authors":"Bo Chen","doi":"10.1111/twec.13578","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"With highly disaggregated data during 2000–2006 in China, we construct the firm‐level international vertical specialisation index and find that China's ascension to WTO decreased the index in manufacturing firms. We investigate its relationship with measured skill premium in manufacturing firms and find that a one percentage point decrease in international vertical specialisation could lead to as much as a two‐tenth percentage point deduction in the skill premium. The effect is more pronounced when the specialisation is with OECD developed economies, while it is reversed with non‐OECD economies. Furthermore, the relationship is only significant in ordinary firms though processing firms also experienced changes in international vertical specialisation during the same period. Our results are robust to various empirical alternatives. We then propose a model that features a two‐stage production in Melitz's (2003, Econometrica, 71, 1695) heterogeneous firm model. The model can explain the puzzle why China's trade volume surged after entering WTO, while the degree of international vertical specialisation decreased. Furthermore, it also explains why vertical specialisation might affect within‐firm skill premium under trade liberalisation.","PeriodicalId":75211,"journal":{"name":"The World economy","volume":"17 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Why does international vertical specialisation affect within‐firm skill premium in China? Investigation and interpretation\",\"authors\":\"Bo Chen\",\"doi\":\"10.1111/twec.13578\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"With highly disaggregated data during 2000–2006 in China, we construct the firm‐level international vertical specialisation index and find that China's ascension to WTO decreased the index in manufacturing firms. We investigate its relationship with measured skill premium in manufacturing firms and find that a one percentage point decrease in international vertical specialisation could lead to as much as a two‐tenth percentage point deduction in the skill premium. The effect is more pronounced when the specialisation is with OECD developed economies, while it is reversed with non‐OECD economies. Furthermore, the relationship is only significant in ordinary firms though processing firms also experienced changes in international vertical specialisation during the same period. Our results are robust to various empirical alternatives. We then propose a model that features a two‐stage production in Melitz's (2003, Econometrica, 71, 1695) heterogeneous firm model. The model can explain the puzzle why China's trade volume surged after entering WTO, while the degree of international vertical specialisation decreased. Furthermore, it also explains why vertical specialisation might affect within‐firm skill premium under trade liberalisation.\",\"PeriodicalId\":75211,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"The World economy\",\"volume\":\"17 2\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"The World economy\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13578\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"The World economy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1111/twec.13578","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

利用中国 2000-2006 年的高分类数据,我们构建了企业层面的国际垂直专业化指数,发现中国加入 WTO 后,制造业企业的国际垂直专业化指数有所下降。我们研究了该指数与制造业企业技能溢价的关系,发现国际纵向专业化程度每下降一个百分点,技能溢价就会下降十分之二。这种影响在与经合组织发达经济体专业化时更为明显,而在与非经合组织经济体专业化时则相反。此外,虽然加工企业在同一时期也经历了国际纵向专业化的变化,但这种关系只在普通企业中显著。我们的结果对各种经验选择都是稳健的。随后,我们在 Melitz(2003,《计量经济学》,71,1695)的异质企业模型中提出了一个以两阶段生产为特征的模型。该模型可以解释为什么中国加入 WTO 后贸易量激增,而国际纵向专业化程度却下降了。此外,该模型还解释了为什么纵向专业化可能会影响贸易自由化下企业内部的技能溢价。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Why does international vertical specialisation affect within‐firm skill premium in China? Investigation and interpretation
With highly disaggregated data during 2000–2006 in China, we construct the firm‐level international vertical specialisation index and find that China's ascension to WTO decreased the index in manufacturing firms. We investigate its relationship with measured skill premium in manufacturing firms and find that a one percentage point decrease in international vertical specialisation could lead to as much as a two‐tenth percentage point deduction in the skill premium. The effect is more pronounced when the specialisation is with OECD developed economies, while it is reversed with non‐OECD economies. Furthermore, the relationship is only significant in ordinary firms though processing firms also experienced changes in international vertical specialisation during the same period. Our results are robust to various empirical alternatives. We then propose a model that features a two‐stage production in Melitz's (2003, Econometrica, 71, 1695) heterogeneous firm model. The model can explain the puzzle why China's trade volume surged after entering WTO, while the degree of international vertical specialisation decreased. Furthermore, it also explains why vertical specialisation might affect within‐firm skill premium under trade liberalisation.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The role of global value chains for worker tasks and wage inequality Bank wholesale funding in an era of rising geopolitical risk Trade openness and growth in a small economy: Evidence from Malawi Global value chains and inward FDI: An empirical investigation of European firms Regional inequalities in the age of nearshoring
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1