{"title":"根据正常固结和过度固结硅质砂中的浅层 CPT 估算相对密度","authors":"M. R. Jensen","doi":"10.1139/cgj-2024-0136","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Current interpretation of relative density (Dr) based on CPT end resistance (qc) data in sand relies on empirical expressions established from calibration chamber studies for which a deep failure penetration mechanism is attained. These expressions are mainly based on stress normalised qc data. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of performing the normalisation procedure with respect to the mean effective stress (p') in overconsolidated (OC) sand deposits instead of the vertical effective stress (σ'v) that has been used in normally consolidated (NC) deposits. Due to a large variation in the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (K0), on which p' depends, in the uppermost (3-5) m of OC sand, a recent study has demonstrated a rigorous unified approach for estimating a varying K0 with depth. However, the surficial shallow failure penetration effects are not accounted for, and consequently, interpretation of the upper (0.5-1.5) m of sand is still erroneous. This depth range is very important for low stress geotechnical applications such as offshore flowlines and mudmats. With a reinterpretation of previously published data, a new global model is presented that enables estimation of Dr from shallow CPTs in siliceous sand by taking into account both the shallow failure penetration effects (important in the uppermost 0.5-1.5 m) as well as the varying K0 with depth for OC sand (important in the uppermost 3-5 m).","PeriodicalId":9382,"journal":{"name":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Estimating relative density from shallow depth CPTs in normally consolidated and overconsolidated siliceous sand\",\"authors\":\"M. R. Jensen\",\"doi\":\"10.1139/cgj-2024-0136\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Current interpretation of relative density (Dr) based on CPT end resistance (qc) data in sand relies on empirical expressions established from calibration chamber studies for which a deep failure penetration mechanism is attained. These expressions are mainly based on stress normalised qc data. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of performing the normalisation procedure with respect to the mean effective stress (p') in overconsolidated (OC) sand deposits instead of the vertical effective stress (σ'v) that has been used in normally consolidated (NC) deposits. Due to a large variation in the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (K0), on which p' depends, in the uppermost (3-5) m of OC sand, a recent study has demonstrated a rigorous unified approach for estimating a varying K0 with depth. However, the surficial shallow failure penetration effects are not accounted for, and consequently, interpretation of the upper (0.5-1.5) m of sand is still erroneous. This depth range is very important for low stress geotechnical applications such as offshore flowlines and mudmats. With a reinterpretation of previously published data, a new global model is presented that enables estimation of Dr from shallow CPTs in siliceous sand by taking into account both the shallow failure penetration effects (important in the uppermost 0.5-1.5 m) as well as the varying K0 with depth for OC sand (important in the uppermost 3-5 m).\",\"PeriodicalId\":9382,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":3.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Canadian Geotechnical Journal\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"89\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0136\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Canadian Geotechnical Journal","FirstCategoryId":"89","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1139/cgj-2024-0136","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, GEOLOGICAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
Estimating relative density from shallow depth CPTs in normally consolidated and overconsolidated siliceous sand
Current interpretation of relative density (Dr) based on CPT end resistance (qc) data in sand relies on empirical expressions established from calibration chamber studies for which a deep failure penetration mechanism is attained. These expressions are mainly based on stress normalised qc data. Previous studies have highlighted the importance of performing the normalisation procedure with respect to the mean effective stress (p') in overconsolidated (OC) sand deposits instead of the vertical effective stress (σ'v) that has been used in normally consolidated (NC) deposits. Due to a large variation in the coefficient of earth pressure at rest (K0), on which p' depends, in the uppermost (3-5) m of OC sand, a recent study has demonstrated a rigorous unified approach for estimating a varying K0 with depth. However, the surficial shallow failure penetration effects are not accounted for, and consequently, interpretation of the upper (0.5-1.5) m of sand is still erroneous. This depth range is very important for low stress geotechnical applications such as offshore flowlines and mudmats. With a reinterpretation of previously published data, a new global model is presented that enables estimation of Dr from shallow CPTs in siliceous sand by taking into account both the shallow failure penetration effects (important in the uppermost 0.5-1.5 m) as well as the varying K0 with depth for OC sand (important in the uppermost 3-5 m).
期刊介绍:
The Canadian Geotechnical Journal features articles, notes, reviews, and discussions related to new developments in geotechnical and geoenvironmental engineering, and applied sciences. The topics of papers written by researchers and engineers/scientists active in industry include soil and rock mechanics, material properties and fundamental behaviour, site characterization, foundations, excavations, tunnels, dams and embankments, slopes, landslides, geological and rock engineering, ground improvement, hydrogeology and contaminant hydrogeology, geochemistry, waste management, geosynthetics, offshore engineering, ice, frozen ground and northern engineering, risk and reliability applications, and physical and numerical modelling.
Contributions that have practical relevance are preferred, including case records. Purely theoretical contributions are not generally published unless they are on a topic of special interest (like unsaturated soil mechanics or cold regions geotechnics) or they have direct practical value.