{"title":"西伊比利亚罗曼史中杰斯珀森循环的不同路径:基于西班牙语和阿斯图里亚斯语的证据 (I)","authors":"Borja Alonso Pascua","doi":"10.24425/linsi.2024.150389","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper is the first part of Alonso Pascua (in press). Both address the question as to why Jespersen’s Cycle (JC) evolved differently in Romance, focusing on the analysis of negation patterns in two West Iberian languages: Spanish and Asturleonese. The hypothesis that JC gets blocked when speakers are provided with evidence that negation is complex, but activated when this evidence is unavailable, will be tested. It will be contended that the alternation of two forms for negation in Old Spanish, triggered by adjacency with object clitics (OCs), provided speakers with evidence of the complex nature of negation and contributed to the blocking of JC. Conversely, it will be argued that the lack of such an alternation in Asturleonese hampered the speaker’s awareness of this complexity and favoured the activation of JC. This evidence will be used to support the hypothesis tested and thus contribute to a better understanding of the long-standing question of JC triggers.","PeriodicalId":52527,"journal":{"name":"Linguistica Silesiana","volume":"87 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Divergent Pathways Of Jespersen’s Cycle In West Iberian Romance: Evidence Based On Spanish And Asturleonese (I)\",\"authors\":\"Borja Alonso Pascua\",\"doi\":\"10.24425/linsi.2024.150389\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This paper is the first part of Alonso Pascua (in press). Both address the question as to why Jespersen’s Cycle (JC) evolved differently in Romance, focusing on the analysis of negation patterns in two West Iberian languages: Spanish and Asturleonese. The hypothesis that JC gets blocked when speakers are provided with evidence that negation is complex, but activated when this evidence is unavailable, will be tested. It will be contended that the alternation of two forms for negation in Old Spanish, triggered by adjacency with object clitics (OCs), provided speakers with evidence of the complex nature of negation and contributed to the blocking of JC. Conversely, it will be argued that the lack of such an alternation in Asturleonese hampered the speaker’s awareness of this complexity and favoured the activation of JC. This evidence will be used to support the hypothesis tested and thus contribute to a better understanding of the long-standing question of JC triggers.\",\"PeriodicalId\":52527,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Linguistica Silesiana\",\"volume\":\"87 8\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Linguistica Silesiana\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2024.150389\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q4\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Linguistica Silesiana","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24425/linsi.2024.150389","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
本文是 Alonso Pascua(出版中)的第一部分。这两篇论文都探讨了为什么杰斯珀森循环(JC)在罗曼语中的演变方式不同,重点分析了两种西伊比利亚语言中的否定模式:西班牙语和阿斯图里亚斯语。我们将对以下假设进行检验:当有证据表明否定是复杂的时,JC 就会被阻断,而当没有这种证据时,JC 就会被激活。我们认为,在古西班牙语中,否定的两种形式交替出现(由与宾语从句(OCs)的邻接引发),为说话者提供了否定复杂性的证据,并促成了 JC 的阻断。相反,阿斯图里亚斯语中缺乏这种交替形式,这妨碍了说话人对这种复杂性的认识,有利于激活 JC。这些证据将被用来支持所验证的假设,从而有助于更好地理解长期存在的 JC 触发器问题。
Divergent Pathways Of Jespersen’s Cycle In West Iberian Romance: Evidence Based On Spanish And Asturleonese (I)
This paper is the first part of Alonso Pascua (in press). Both address the question as to why Jespersen’s Cycle (JC) evolved differently in Romance, focusing on the analysis of negation patterns in two West Iberian languages: Spanish and Asturleonese. The hypothesis that JC gets blocked when speakers are provided with evidence that negation is complex, but activated when this evidence is unavailable, will be tested. It will be contended that the alternation of two forms for negation in Old Spanish, triggered by adjacency with object clitics (OCs), provided speakers with evidence of the complex nature of negation and contributed to the blocking of JC. Conversely, it will be argued that the lack of such an alternation in Asturleonese hampered the speaker’s awareness of this complexity and favoured the activation of JC. This evidence will be used to support the hypothesis tested and thus contribute to a better understanding of the long-standing question of JC triggers.