{"title":"新生儿动脉血与毛细血管血平均血气参数的比较:系统回顾和元分析协议","authors":"Pooja S, Kalesh M Karun, Roseline K Madathil","doi":"10.52403/ijhsr.20240722","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Blood gas sampling and acid-base determination are essential tools in evaluating, managing, and monitoring neonates with respiratory or circulatory issues, especially those receiving respiratory support. Arterial Blood Gas & Capillary Blood Gas are two types of blood gas tests done in the neonatal ICU. Arterial punctures are painful and may cause arterial injury, thrombosis with distal ischemia, haemorrhage and aneurysm formation. Capillary blood gas samples are easier to obtain and are a less invasive way of evaluating blood gas parameters in neonates. This study protocol outlines the methodology for collating evidence from multiple studies that compare capillary blood gas and arterial blood gas and will help to find out whether capillary blood gas could be used as a reliable alternative to arterial blood gas. The review will retrieve information from three major databases: PubMed, Scopus & Web of Science. Literature screening and data extraction will be completed by two authors independently. Authors will use Newcastle-Ottawa Scale & Joanna Brigg’s Institute critical appraisal checklist to assess the included studies. Results will be visually represented through a forest plot, incorporating individual effect estimates, pooled estimates, and 95% confidence intervals. The EZR or STATA Software will be used to perform the meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the available evidence and contribute to our understanding in the controversy arising from conflicting studies on the reliability of capillary blood samples as a substitute to arterial samples.\n\nKey words: Blood gases; Meta-analysis; Neonates; Systematic review, pH, PCO2, PO2","PeriodicalId":14119,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","volume":"60 5","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Comparison of Average Blood Gas Parameters Between Arterial Blood & Capillary Blood in Neonates: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis\",\"authors\":\"Pooja S, Kalesh M Karun, Roseline K Madathil\",\"doi\":\"10.52403/ijhsr.20240722\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Blood gas sampling and acid-base determination are essential tools in evaluating, managing, and monitoring neonates with respiratory or circulatory issues, especially those receiving respiratory support. Arterial Blood Gas & Capillary Blood Gas are two types of blood gas tests done in the neonatal ICU. Arterial punctures are painful and may cause arterial injury, thrombosis with distal ischemia, haemorrhage and aneurysm formation. Capillary blood gas samples are easier to obtain and are a less invasive way of evaluating blood gas parameters in neonates. This study protocol outlines the methodology for collating evidence from multiple studies that compare capillary blood gas and arterial blood gas and will help to find out whether capillary blood gas could be used as a reliable alternative to arterial blood gas. The review will retrieve information from three major databases: PubMed, Scopus & Web of Science. Literature screening and data extraction will be completed by two authors independently. Authors will use Newcastle-Ottawa Scale & Joanna Brigg’s Institute critical appraisal checklist to assess the included studies. Results will be visually represented through a forest plot, incorporating individual effect estimates, pooled estimates, and 95% confidence intervals. The EZR or STATA Software will be used to perform the meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the available evidence and contribute to our understanding in the controversy arising from conflicting studies on the reliability of capillary blood samples as a substitute to arterial samples.\\n\\nKey words: Blood gases; Meta-analysis; Neonates; Systematic review, pH, PCO2, PO2\",\"PeriodicalId\":14119,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research\",\"volume\":\"60 5\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20240722\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Health Sciences and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.52403/ijhsr.20240722","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
摘要
血气采样和酸碱测定是评估、管理和监测有呼吸或循环问题的新生儿(尤其是接受呼吸支持的新生儿)的重要工具。动脉血气和毛细血管血气是在新生儿重症监护室进行的两种血气检测。动脉穿刺会造成疼痛,并可能导致动脉损伤、血栓形成和远端缺血、出血和动脉瘤形成。毛细血管血气样本更容易获得,是评估新生儿血气参数的一种侵入性较小的方法。本研究方案概述了对毛细血管血气和动脉血气进行比较的多项研究的证据进行整理的方法,将有助于找出毛细血管血气是否可作为动脉血气的可靠替代品。该综述将从三大数据库中检索信息:PubMed、Scopus 和 Web of Science。文献筛选和数据提取将由两位作者独立完成。作者将使用纽卡斯尔-渥太华量表和乔安娜-布里格研究所的批判性评估清单来评估纳入的研究。研究结果将通过森林图直观地表示出来,包括个体效应估计值、汇总估计值和 95% 置信区间。将使用 EZR 或 STATA 软件进行荟萃分析。本系统综述将总结现有证据,并有助于我们理解关于毛细管血液样本替代动脉样本的可靠性的相互矛盾的研究引起的争议:血气 Meta 分析 新生儿 系统综述 pH PCO2 PO2
Comparison of Average Blood Gas Parameters Between Arterial Blood & Capillary Blood in Neonates: A Protocol for Systematic Review and Meta-analysis
Blood gas sampling and acid-base determination are essential tools in evaluating, managing, and monitoring neonates with respiratory or circulatory issues, especially those receiving respiratory support. Arterial Blood Gas & Capillary Blood Gas are two types of blood gas tests done in the neonatal ICU. Arterial punctures are painful and may cause arterial injury, thrombosis with distal ischemia, haemorrhage and aneurysm formation. Capillary blood gas samples are easier to obtain and are a less invasive way of evaluating blood gas parameters in neonates. This study protocol outlines the methodology for collating evidence from multiple studies that compare capillary blood gas and arterial blood gas and will help to find out whether capillary blood gas could be used as a reliable alternative to arterial blood gas. The review will retrieve information from three major databases: PubMed, Scopus & Web of Science. Literature screening and data extraction will be completed by two authors independently. Authors will use Newcastle-Ottawa Scale & Joanna Brigg’s Institute critical appraisal checklist to assess the included studies. Results will be visually represented through a forest plot, incorporating individual effect estimates, pooled estimates, and 95% confidence intervals. The EZR or STATA Software will be used to perform the meta-analysis. This systematic review will summarise the available evidence and contribute to our understanding in the controversy arising from conflicting studies on the reliability of capillary blood samples as a substitute to arterial samples.
Key words: Blood gases; Meta-analysis; Neonates; Systematic review, pH, PCO2, PO2