关于全科医生在痴呆症诊断中的作用的指南建议:临床实践指南范围界定审查协议

Mary Cronin, A. Jennings, Marieke Perry, I. Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Nicola Cornally, Suzanne Timmons, K. Walsh, Tony Foley
{"title":"关于全科医生在痴呆症诊断中的作用的指南建议:临床实践指南范围界定审查协议","authors":"Mary Cronin, A. Jennings, Marieke Perry, I. Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Nicola Cornally, Suzanne Timmons, K. Walsh, Tony Foley","doi":"10.12688/hrbopenres.13919.1","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction A timely diagnosis of dementia offers the opportunity of earlier intervention and activation of coordinated care plans. General Practitioners (GPs) play a key role in dementia diagnosis, from symptom recognition to clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral for confirmation of the diagnosis and subtyping. Dementia clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer clinicians guidance on dementia care but often do not specifically address the role of the GP in the diagnostic process. This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify evidence-based dementia clinical practice guidelines and map the recommended role of GPs in the diagnosis of dementia. Method The scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to guide the reporting. We will search five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library) for dementia CPGs published since 2019. CPGs are often not published in peer-reviewed journals; therefore, a parallel search of relevant grey literature will be conducted. We will also search the websites of GP professional organisations and guideline developers. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles based on inclusion criteria, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Conclusion This scoping review will examine up-to-date dementia CPGs to determine recommendations for the role of GPs in the assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral of patients with suspected dementia to secondary care.","PeriodicalId":73254,"journal":{"name":"HRB open research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Guideline recommendations on the role of the general practitioner in the diagnosis of dementia: a protocol for a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines\",\"authors\":\"Mary Cronin, A. Jennings, Marieke Perry, I. Hartigan, Séan O'Dowd, Nicola Cornally, Suzanne Timmons, K. Walsh, Tony Foley\",\"doi\":\"10.12688/hrbopenres.13919.1\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Introduction A timely diagnosis of dementia offers the opportunity of earlier intervention and activation of coordinated care plans. General Practitioners (GPs) play a key role in dementia diagnosis, from symptom recognition to clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral for confirmation of the diagnosis and subtyping. Dementia clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer clinicians guidance on dementia care but often do not specifically address the role of the GP in the diagnostic process. This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify evidence-based dementia clinical practice guidelines and map the recommended role of GPs in the diagnosis of dementia. Method The scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to guide the reporting. We will search five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library) for dementia CPGs published since 2019. CPGs are often not published in peer-reviewed journals; therefore, a parallel search of relevant grey literature will be conducted. We will also search the websites of GP professional organisations and guideline developers. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles based on inclusion criteria, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Conclusion This scoping review will examine up-to-date dementia CPGs to determine recommendations for the role of GPs in the assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral of patients with suspected dementia to secondary care.\",\"PeriodicalId\":73254,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"HRB open research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"HRB open research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13919.1\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"HRB open research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12688/hrbopenres.13919.1","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

导言:对痴呆症的及时诊断为早期干预和启动协调护理计划提供了机会。全科医生(GPs)在痴呆症诊断中发挥着关键作用,从症状识别到临床评估、检查、诊断以及转诊确诊和亚型鉴定。痴呆症临床实践指南(CPG)为临床医生提供了痴呆症护理指导,但往往没有具体涉及全科医生在诊断过程中的作用。本方案概述了一项范围界定审查,以确定基于证据的痴呆症临床实践指南,并绘制全科医生在痴呆症诊断中的建议角色图。方法 将使用 Arksey 和 O'Malley 框架进行范围界定综述,并使用用于范围界定综述的系统综述和荟萃分析扩展首选报告项目 (PRISMA-ScR) 来指导报告。我们将在五个电子数据库(PubMed、CINAHL、Embase、PsycINFO、Cochrane Library)中检索 2019 年以来发布的痴呆症 CPG。CPG 通常不会在同行评审期刊上发表;因此,我们将同时检索相关灰色文献。我们还将搜索全科医生专业组织和指南制定者的网站。两名审稿人将根据纳入标准独立筛选所有文章,并由第三名审稿人解决冲突问题。结论 本范围界定综述将研究最新的痴呆症 CPG,以确定全科医生在疑似痴呆症患者的评估、调查、诊断和转诊至二级医疗机构的过程中所扮演角色的建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Guideline recommendations on the role of the general practitioner in the diagnosis of dementia: a protocol for a scoping review of clinical practice guidelines
Introduction A timely diagnosis of dementia offers the opportunity of earlier intervention and activation of coordinated care plans. General Practitioners (GPs) play a key role in dementia diagnosis, from symptom recognition to clinical assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral for confirmation of the diagnosis and subtyping. Dementia clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) offer clinicians guidance on dementia care but often do not specifically address the role of the GP in the diagnostic process. This protocol outlines a scoping review to identify evidence-based dementia clinical practice guidelines and map the recommended role of GPs in the diagnosis of dementia. Method The scoping review will be conducted using the Arksey and O'Malley framework, and the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analysis extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) will be used to guide the reporting. We will search five electronic databases (PubMed, CINAHL, Embase, PsycINFO, Cochrane Library) for dementia CPGs published since 2019. CPGs are often not published in peer-reviewed journals; therefore, a parallel search of relevant grey literature will be conducted. We will also search the websites of GP professional organisations and guideline developers. Two reviewers will independently screen all articles based on inclusion criteria, with conflicts resolved by a third reviewer. Conclusion This scoping review will examine up-to-date dementia CPGs to determine recommendations for the role of GPs in the assessment, investigation, diagnosis and onward referral of patients with suspected dementia to secondary care.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Tracking aspects of healthcare activity during the first nine months of COVID-19 in Ireland: a secondary analysis of publicly available data. Diagnostic test accuracy of screening tools for the detection of neurocognitive disorders in older adults post-trauma: A protocol for a systematic review. Altmetric coverage of health research in Ireland 2017-2023: a protocol for a cross-sectional analysis. Contextual factors and intentional rounding in acute hospitals: understanding what works, for whom, in what settings: a realist synthesis protocol. What is known from the existing literature about the treatment of Mallet Injury using 3D printed splints? A Scoping Review Protocol.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1