早期和晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术在治疗 Bundelkhand 地区急性胆囊炎方面的比较研究

Manoj Kumar, Ramesh Chandra Arun
{"title":"早期和晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术在治疗 Bundelkhand 地区急性胆囊炎方面的比较研究","authors":"Manoj Kumar, Ramesh Chandra Arun","doi":"10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51349","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the procedure of choice for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. The following study is an attempt to compare the outcome and operative complications of early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis in a tertiary care center in Banda district of bundelkhand region.\nMethods: The present study involved a review of case records of 80 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, admitted in the surgical wards of a tertiary care center of Banda district during the period from January 2023 to December 2023 who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an elective basis. Participants were divided into two groups, Group A (early laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and Group B (delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy) containing 40 patients each. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed and analyzed.\nResults: The present study showed statistically significant differences in age distribution and duration of surgery. The average duration of surgery was 42.3±8.97 min in Group “A” and 53.5±9.87 min for Group “B.” Male-to-female ratio was 2:1. The rate of conversion was found to be 2.5% in Group “A” as compared to 10% in Group “B.” Post-operative complications such as wound infection and biliary leakage were more common in Group “B” in comparison of Group “A.”\nConclusion: Early cholecystectomy can be considered a safe and better method of treatment for acute cholecystitis due to its shorter hospital stay, avoidance of readmission to hospital, and decreased overall costs of treatment which is a major economic benefit to both the patient and health care system in comparison of late cholecystectomy.","PeriodicalId":8528,"journal":{"name":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN BUNDELKHAND REGION\",\"authors\":\"Manoj Kumar, Ramesh Chandra Arun\",\"doi\":\"10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51349\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the procedure of choice for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. The following study is an attempt to compare the outcome and operative complications of early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis in a tertiary care center in Banda district of bundelkhand region.\\nMethods: The present study involved a review of case records of 80 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, admitted in the surgical wards of a tertiary care center of Banda district during the period from January 2023 to December 2023 who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an elective basis. Participants were divided into two groups, Group A (early laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and Group B (delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy) containing 40 patients each. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed and analyzed.\\nResults: The present study showed statistically significant differences in age distribution and duration of surgery. The average duration of surgery was 42.3±8.97 min in Group “A” and 53.5±9.87 min for Group “B.” Male-to-female ratio was 2:1. The rate of conversion was found to be 2.5% in Group “A” as compared to 10% in Group “B.” Post-operative complications such as wound infection and biliary leakage were more common in Group “B” in comparison of Group “A.”\\nConclusion: Early cholecystectomy can be considered a safe and better method of treatment for acute cholecystitis due to its shorter hospital stay, avoidance of readmission to hospital, and decreased overall costs of treatment which is a major economic benefit to both the patient and health care system in comparison of late cholecystectomy.\",\"PeriodicalId\":8528,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-07\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51349\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Asian Journal of Pharmaceutical and Clinical Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22159/ajpcr.2024v17i7.51349","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的:腹腔镜胆囊切除术被认为是急性胆囊炎患者的首选手术。以下研究试图比较在邦德尔汉德地区班达县的一家三级医疗中心对急性胆囊炎患者进行早期和晚期腹腔镜胆囊切除术的结果和手术并发症:本研究回顾了 2023 年 1 月至 2023 年 12 月期间班达地区一家三级医疗中心外科病房收治的 80 例临床诊断为急性胆囊炎并择期接受腹腔镜胆囊切除术的患者的病例记录。参与者分为两组,A 组(早期腹腔镜胆囊切除术)和 B 组(延迟腹腔镜胆囊切除术),每组 40 名患者。研究人员查阅并分析了这些患者的住院病历:本研究显示,年龄分布和手术时间在统计学上存在显著差异。A组的平均手术时间为(42.3±8.97)分钟,B组为(53.5±9.87)分钟。男女比例为 2:1。发现 "A "组的转归率为 2.5%,而 "B "组为 10%。与 "A组 "相比,"B组 "的术后并发症如伤口感染和胆漏更为常见:与晚期胆囊切除术相比,早期胆囊切除术可缩短住院时间,避免再次入院,并降低总体治疗费用,对患者和医疗保健系统而言都是一项重大的经济效益,因此可被视为治疗急性胆囊炎的一种安全且更好的方法。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN BUNDELKHAND REGION
Objectives: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is considered the procedure of choice for patients presenting with acute cholecystitis. The following study is an attempt to compare the outcome and operative complications of early versus late laparoscopic cholecystectomy in patients presenting with acute cholecystitis in a tertiary care center in Banda district of bundelkhand region. Methods: The present study involved a review of case records of 80 patients with the clinical diagnosis of acute cholecystitis, admitted in the surgical wards of a tertiary care center of Banda district during the period from January 2023 to December 2023 who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy on an elective basis. Participants were divided into two groups, Group A (early laparoscopic cholecystectomy) and Group B (delayed laparoscopic cholecystectomy) containing 40 patients each. The hospital records of these patients were reviewed and analyzed. Results: The present study showed statistically significant differences in age distribution and duration of surgery. The average duration of surgery was 42.3±8.97 min in Group “A” and 53.5±9.87 min for Group “B.” Male-to-female ratio was 2:1. The rate of conversion was found to be 2.5% in Group “A” as compared to 10% in Group “B.” Post-operative complications such as wound infection and biliary leakage were more common in Group “B” in comparison of Group “A.” Conclusion: Early cholecystectomy can be considered a safe and better method of treatment for acute cholecystitis due to its shorter hospital stay, avoidance of readmission to hospital, and decreased overall costs of treatment which is a major economic benefit to both the patient and health care system in comparison of late cholecystectomy.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
REVERSE-PHASE HIGH-PERFORMANCE LIQUID CHROMATOGRAPHY METHOD DEVELOPMENT AND VALIDATION FOR THE QUANTIFICATION OF SUGAMMADEX IN BULK AND PHARMACEUTICAL DOSAGE FORM CLINICAL PROFILE AND PREGNANCY OUTCOMES OF COVID POSITIVE PREGNANT WOMEN IN PHASE I ANDII INFECTION – A COMPARATIVE STUDY EFFECTIVENESS OF WRIST BLOCK FOR SURGERY OF FRACTURE PROXIMAL INTERPHALANGEAL JOINT: A CASE REPORT COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN EARLY AND LATE LAPAROSCOPIC CHOLECYSTECTOMY IN TREATMENT OF ACUTE CHOLECYSTITIS IN BUNDELKHAND REGION POST-OPERATIVE URINARY RETENTION AFTER SPINAL ANESTHESIA IN HERNIA SURGERY: A PROSPECTIVE, COMPARATIVE DOUBLE-BLIND STUDY BETWEEN ROPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.75% AND BUPIVACAINE HEAVY 0.5%
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1