社交媒体作为公共领域在讨论伊丽莎白女王一世之死中的应用

Emmanuel Jibb Adams
{"title":"社交媒体作为公共领域在讨论伊丽莎白女王一世之死中的应用","authors":"Emmanuel Jibb Adams","doi":"10.36941/mjss-2024-0027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study delves into the role of social media platforms as public spheres following the demise of Queen Elizabeth II. Rooted in Public Sphere theory by Habermas (1962), the research seeks to uncover dominant themes, frames, and overall sentiment surrounding the discourse, contributing to the understanding of public engagement in the digital age. Employing a mixed content analysis approach, the study examines user-generated content from a diverse array of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and others. By scrutinizing discussions across these platforms, the research endeavors to capture the breadth and depth of public sentiment and dialogue regarding the late monarch's legacy. Initial findings suggest that discussions on Queen Elizabeth II's impact extend beyond national boundaries, with users expressing gratitude for her unifying role and representation of national identity. Furthermore, the study explores the nuanced nature of social media responses, reflecting a spectrum of emotions ranging from sorrow and admiration to critical reflection and debate. The study's conclusion emphasizes the significance of social media platforms in shaping contemporary public discourse and recommends enhancements to facilitate more constructive conversations and interactions. By leveraging the unique affordances of digital platforms, social media can serve as dynamic public spheres, fostering dialogue and understanding in an increasingly interconnected world. \n  \nReceived: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024 \n ","PeriodicalId":90922,"journal":{"name":"Mediterranean journal of social sciences","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Usage of Social Media as a Public Sphere in Discussing the Death of Queen Elizabeth Ii\",\"authors\":\"Emmanuel Jibb Adams\",\"doi\":\"10.36941/mjss-2024-0027\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This study delves into the role of social media platforms as public spheres following the demise of Queen Elizabeth II. Rooted in Public Sphere theory by Habermas (1962), the research seeks to uncover dominant themes, frames, and overall sentiment surrounding the discourse, contributing to the understanding of public engagement in the digital age. Employing a mixed content analysis approach, the study examines user-generated content from a diverse array of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and others. By scrutinizing discussions across these platforms, the research endeavors to capture the breadth and depth of public sentiment and dialogue regarding the late monarch's legacy. Initial findings suggest that discussions on Queen Elizabeth II's impact extend beyond national boundaries, with users expressing gratitude for her unifying role and representation of national identity. Furthermore, the study explores the nuanced nature of social media responses, reflecting a spectrum of emotions ranging from sorrow and admiration to critical reflection and debate. The study's conclusion emphasizes the significance of social media platforms in shaping contemporary public discourse and recommends enhancements to facilitate more constructive conversations and interactions. By leveraging the unique affordances of digital platforms, social media can serve as dynamic public spheres, fostering dialogue and understanding in an increasingly interconnected world. \\n  \\nReceived: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024 \\n \",\"PeriodicalId\":90922,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Mediterranean journal of social sciences\",\"volume\":\" 9\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Mediterranean journal of social sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2024-0027\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Mediterranean journal of social sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/mjss-2024-0027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本研究深入探讨了女王伊丽莎白二世逝世后社交媒体平台作为公共领域所发挥的作用。本研究以哈贝马斯(1962 年)的公共领域理论为基础,试图揭示围绕话语的主导主题、框架和整体情绪,从而加深对数字时代公众参与的理解。本研究采用混合内容分析法,对推特(Twitter)、脸书(Facebook)、Instagram、TikTok 等各种平台上的用户生成内容进行研究。通过仔细研究这些平台上的讨论,研究试图捕捉公众对已故君主遗产的情感和对话的广度和深度。初步研究结果表明,关于伊丽莎白女王二世的影响的讨论超越了国界,用户对她的统一作用和国家认同的代表表示感谢。此外,该研究还探讨了社交媒体反应的细微差别,反映了从悲伤和钦佩到批判性反思和辩论等各种情绪。本研究的结论强调了社交媒体平台在塑造当代公共话语中的重要作用,并建议加强社交媒体平台以促进更具建设性的对话和互动。通过利用数字平台的独特功能,社交媒体可以成为一个动态的公共领域,在一个日益相互联系的世界中促进对话和理解。 收到:接受:2024 年 4 月 16 日 / 接受:2024 年 6 月 24 日 / 发表:2024 年 7 月 8 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Usage of Social Media as a Public Sphere in Discussing the Death of Queen Elizabeth Ii
This study delves into the role of social media platforms as public spheres following the demise of Queen Elizabeth II. Rooted in Public Sphere theory by Habermas (1962), the research seeks to uncover dominant themes, frames, and overall sentiment surrounding the discourse, contributing to the understanding of public engagement in the digital age. Employing a mixed content analysis approach, the study examines user-generated content from a diverse array of platforms, including Twitter, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, and others. By scrutinizing discussions across these platforms, the research endeavors to capture the breadth and depth of public sentiment and dialogue regarding the late monarch's legacy. Initial findings suggest that discussions on Queen Elizabeth II's impact extend beyond national boundaries, with users expressing gratitude for her unifying role and representation of national identity. Furthermore, the study explores the nuanced nature of social media responses, reflecting a spectrum of emotions ranging from sorrow and admiration to critical reflection and debate. The study's conclusion emphasizes the significance of social media platforms in shaping contemporary public discourse and recommends enhancements to facilitate more constructive conversations and interactions. By leveraging the unique affordances of digital platforms, social media can serve as dynamic public spheres, fostering dialogue and understanding in an increasingly interconnected world.   Received: 16 April 2024 / Accepted: 24 June 2024 / Published: 8 July 2024  
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Impact of Electronic-Governance on Students’ Management in Environmental Education Department University of Calabar-Calabar, Nigeria Discourse of Editing Narratives in Animated Series: A Study on Baahubali -The Lost Legends Treasury Looting and Carting Away of Government Property by State Governors in South Western, Nigeria Quality Assurance Indicators and Sustainable Assessment Integrity in Universities in Nigeria Between Trust and Misinformation: A Study of User Engagement with Cloned Pages of ‘Daily Trust’ and ‘Vanguard’ Newspapers on Facebook
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1