揭示穿孔尺寸对气调包装冷藏鸡肉饼理化、感官和微生物属性的影响

IF 2.8 4区 工程技术 Q2 ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING Packaging Technology and Science Pub Date : 2024-07-06 DOI:10.1002/pts.2834
Kaneez Ayesha, Samran Khalid, Kashmala Chaudhary, Sadia Ansar, Muqaddas Zahid, Syed Ali Hassan, Nadia Bashir, Muhammad Naeem, Jahan Zaib Ashraf, H. Onyeaka
{"title":"揭示穿孔尺寸对气调包装冷藏鸡肉饼理化、感官和微生物属性的影响","authors":"Kaneez Ayesha, Samran Khalid, Kashmala Chaudhary, Sadia Ansar, Muqaddas Zahid, Syed Ali Hassan, Nadia Bashir, Muhammad Naeem, Jahan Zaib Ashraf, H. Onyeaka","doi":"10.1002/pts.2834","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The changes in lifestyle patterns and the adoption of a busy life have led to the widespread acceptance of ready‐to‐cook (RTC) products, particularly meat products. Chicken patties, being a preprocessed RTC product, are consumed worldwide. This study investigates the impact of perforated modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the physicochemical, sensory and microbial attributes of chicken patties stored at 4 °C for 14 days. The focus is on assessing the consequences of package damage occurring at any stage of the supply chain. Perforations measuring 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm were introduced into polypropylene packaging boxes, wherein chicken patties were subsequently packaged under five distinct gas concentrations of CO2 (ranging from 0% to 50%) and O2 (ranging from 0% to 50%), alongside a constant level of 50% N2. A control group containing normal air along with perforations was included for comparison with other groups containing modified atmospheres. The results indicated that the package (PPCON9) with the highest concentration of CO2 (50%) and the lowest O2 (0%) with 0.2 mm perforations was the most effective in preserving the quality attributes of chicken patties during storage by reducing moisture loss (3%), protein denaturation (0.38%), lipid oxidation (0.54%), cooking loss (0.72%), shrinkage (0.18%), water holding capacity (5.67%), sensory losses and microbial spoilage. The highest losses occurred in the package with 0.4 mm perforations containing normal air (PPA2). The study highlights that even if a package containing a modified atmosphere is damaged, it still efficiently preserves the chicken patties compared to a damaged package containing normal air. However, leakage significantly impacts the efficiency of MAP, necessitating effective solutions to prevent losses that occur from this issue.","PeriodicalId":19626,"journal":{"name":"Packaging Technology and Science","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-06","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Unravelling the Influence of Perforation Sizes on Physicochemical, Sensory and Microbial Attributes of Modified Atmosphere Packaged Refrigerated Chicken Patties\",\"authors\":\"Kaneez Ayesha, Samran Khalid, Kashmala Chaudhary, Sadia Ansar, Muqaddas Zahid, Syed Ali Hassan, Nadia Bashir, Muhammad Naeem, Jahan Zaib Ashraf, H. Onyeaka\",\"doi\":\"10.1002/pts.2834\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The changes in lifestyle patterns and the adoption of a busy life have led to the widespread acceptance of ready‐to‐cook (RTC) products, particularly meat products. Chicken patties, being a preprocessed RTC product, are consumed worldwide. This study investigates the impact of perforated modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the physicochemical, sensory and microbial attributes of chicken patties stored at 4 °C for 14 days. The focus is on assessing the consequences of package damage occurring at any stage of the supply chain. Perforations measuring 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm were introduced into polypropylene packaging boxes, wherein chicken patties were subsequently packaged under five distinct gas concentrations of CO2 (ranging from 0% to 50%) and O2 (ranging from 0% to 50%), alongside a constant level of 50% N2. A control group containing normal air along with perforations was included for comparison with other groups containing modified atmospheres. The results indicated that the package (PPCON9) with the highest concentration of CO2 (50%) and the lowest O2 (0%) with 0.2 mm perforations was the most effective in preserving the quality attributes of chicken patties during storage by reducing moisture loss (3%), protein denaturation (0.38%), lipid oxidation (0.54%), cooking loss (0.72%), shrinkage (0.18%), water holding capacity (5.67%), sensory losses and microbial spoilage. The highest losses occurred in the package with 0.4 mm perforations containing normal air (PPA2). The study highlights that even if a package containing a modified atmosphere is damaged, it still efficiently preserves the chicken patties compared to a damaged package containing normal air. However, leakage significantly impacts the efficiency of MAP, necessitating effective solutions to prevent losses that occur from this issue.\",\"PeriodicalId\":19626,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Packaging Technology and Science\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-06\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Packaging Technology and Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2834\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Packaging Technology and Science","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1002/pts.2834","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MANUFACTURING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

生活方式的改变和忙碌的生活促使人们广泛接受即食烹饪(RTC)产品,尤其是肉类产品。鸡肉饼作为一种预加工的 RTC 产品,在全球范围内都有消费。本研究调查了带孔改良气氛包装(MAP)对在 4 °C 下储存 14 天的鸡肉饼的理化、感官和微生物属性的影响。重点是评估在供应链的任何阶段发生包装损坏的后果。在聚丙烯包装盒上分别打出 0.2 毫米和 0.4 毫米的孔,随后在五种不同浓度的二氧化碳(浓度从 0% 到 50% 不等)和氧气(浓度从 0% 到 50% 不等)以及恒定浓度的 50% N2 下对鸡肉饼进行包装。对照组中含有正常空气和穿孔,以便与其他含有改良气氛的组进行比较。结果表明,二氧化碳浓度最高(50%)、氧气浓度最低(0%)、带 0.2 毫米穿孔的包装(PPCON9)在贮藏期间最有效地保持了鸡肉饼的质量属性,减少了水分损失(3%)、蛋白质变性(0.38%)、脂质氧化(0.54%)、蒸煮损失(0.72%)、收缩(0.18%)、持水量(5.67%)、感官损失和微生物腐败。含有正常空气的 0.4 毫米穿孔包装(PPA2)的损失最大。这项研究强调,与含有正常空气的受损包装相比,即使含有改良气氛的包装受损,它仍能有效地保存鸡肉饼。然而,泄漏会严重影响 MAP 的效率,因此需要有效的解决方案来防止因泄漏而造成的损失。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Unravelling the Influence of Perforation Sizes on Physicochemical, Sensory and Microbial Attributes of Modified Atmosphere Packaged Refrigerated Chicken Patties
The changes in lifestyle patterns and the adoption of a busy life have led to the widespread acceptance of ready‐to‐cook (RTC) products, particularly meat products. Chicken patties, being a preprocessed RTC product, are consumed worldwide. This study investigates the impact of perforated modified atmosphere packaging (MAP) on the physicochemical, sensory and microbial attributes of chicken patties stored at 4 °C for 14 days. The focus is on assessing the consequences of package damage occurring at any stage of the supply chain. Perforations measuring 0.2 mm and 0.4 mm were introduced into polypropylene packaging boxes, wherein chicken patties were subsequently packaged under five distinct gas concentrations of CO2 (ranging from 0% to 50%) and O2 (ranging from 0% to 50%), alongside a constant level of 50% N2. A control group containing normal air along with perforations was included for comparison with other groups containing modified atmospheres. The results indicated that the package (PPCON9) with the highest concentration of CO2 (50%) and the lowest O2 (0%) with 0.2 mm perforations was the most effective in preserving the quality attributes of chicken patties during storage by reducing moisture loss (3%), protein denaturation (0.38%), lipid oxidation (0.54%), cooking loss (0.72%), shrinkage (0.18%), water holding capacity (5.67%), sensory losses and microbial spoilage. The highest losses occurred in the package with 0.4 mm perforations containing normal air (PPA2). The study highlights that even if a package containing a modified atmosphere is damaged, it still efficiently preserves the chicken patties compared to a damaged package containing normal air. However, leakage significantly impacts the efficiency of MAP, necessitating effective solutions to prevent losses that occur from this issue.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Packaging Technology and Science
Packaging Technology and Science 工程技术-工程:制造
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
7.70%
发文量
78
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Packaging Technology & Science publishes original research, applications and review papers describing significant, novel developments in its field. The Journal welcomes contributions in a wide range of areas in packaging technology and science, including: -Active packaging -Aseptic and sterile packaging -Barrier packaging -Design methodology -Environmental factors and sustainability -Ergonomics -Food packaging -Machinery and engineering for packaging -Marketing aspects of packaging -Materials -Migration -New manufacturing processes and techniques -Testing, analysis and quality control -Transport packaging
期刊最新文献
Enhancing Packaging Design for Dynamic Loads: A Methodological Approach for Corner Impact Situations in Packaging Active Biopackaging Films Enriched With Andız (Juniperus drupacea L.) Shell Extract for Fresh Meat Packaging Characterization of Composite Film Containing Polyvinyl Alcohol Cross‐Linked With Dialdehyde Cellulose Using Citric Acid as a Catalyst for Sustainable Packaging Facile Preparation of Chitosan/Carnauba Wax Emulsion‐Based Coatings for Hydrophobic and Oleophobic Cellulose‐Based Food Packaging Identifying Performance Conditions for a Radical Scavenging Active Packaging Material
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1