人类世世界中的公民气候大会、可持续性和民主创新

Lars Tønder
{"title":"人类世世界中的公民气候大会、可持续性和民主创新","authors":"Lars Tønder","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"The article contributes to research on sustainability at a time when humans and non-humans are more entangled than ever before. It focuses on the Danish national citizens’ climate assembly, which on the one hand appears as a genuine renewal that puts climate first but on the other hand is subject to a human-centered perspective that risks undermining the possibility of sustainability for all. The article examines the tension between these two trends, starting from discussions about the Anthropocene and its significance for democracy and the political. The article is particularly interested in examining how democratic innovations as a citizens’ climate assembly allow the non-human to speak – for example by including animals and plants in the deliberative process – and in this way contribute to a real ecologicalization of democratic deliberation. The article compares this possibility with the results from the research project “Democratic Innovations in a Green Transition,” which over the past three years has closely followed the Danish Citizens’ Climate Assembly through qualitative and quantitative studies. The article uses the results of the studies as a prism for a more general problem: That climate policy is developed and decided through democratic-institutional frameworks that do not align with the changed human-nature relationship that prevails in an Anthropocene world.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Citizens’ climate assembly, sustainability, and democratic innovation in an Anthropocene world\",\"authors\":\"Lars Tønder\",\"doi\":\"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"The article contributes to research on sustainability at a time when humans and non-humans are more entangled than ever before. It focuses on the Danish national citizens’ climate assembly, which on the one hand appears as a genuine renewal that puts climate first but on the other hand is subject to a human-centered perspective that risks undermining the possibility of sustainability for all. The article examines the tension between these two trends, starting from discussions about the Anthropocene and its significance for democracy and the political. The article is particularly interested in examining how democratic innovations as a citizens’ climate assembly allow the non-human to speak – for example by including animals and plants in the deliberative process – and in this way contribute to a real ecologicalization of democratic deliberation. The article compares this possibility with the results from the research project “Democratic Innovations in a Green Transition,” which over the past three years has closely followed the Danish Citizens’ Climate Assembly through qualitative and quantitative studies. The article uses the results of the studies as a prism for a more general problem: That climate policy is developed and decided through democratic-institutional frameworks that do not align with the changed human-nature relationship that prevails in an Anthropocene world.\",\"PeriodicalId\":31188,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Politica\",\"volume\":\" 34\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-05\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Politica\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Politica","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

在人类和非人类比以往任何时候都更加紧密地纠缠在一起的时候,这篇文章为可持续性研究做出了贡献。文章重点关注丹麦全国公民气候大会,一方面,该大会似乎是将气候问题放在首位的真正革新,但另一方面,它又受制于以人为本的视角,有可能损害所有人的可持续性。文章从 "人类世 "的讨论及其对民主和政治的意义出发,探讨了这两种趋势之间的紧张关系。文章尤其关注公民气候大会等民主创新如何允许非人类发言--例如通过将动物和植物纳入审议过程--并以此促进民主审议的真正生态化。文章将这种可能性与 "绿色转型中的民主创新 "研究项目的结果进行比较,该项目在过去三年中通过定性和定量研究密切跟踪了丹麦公民气候大会。文章将研究结果作为一个更普遍问题的多棱镜:气候政策是通过民主制度框架制定和决定的,而这种框架并不符合人类世世界中已发生变化的人与自然的关系。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Citizens’ climate assembly, sustainability, and democratic innovation in an Anthropocene world
The article contributes to research on sustainability at a time when humans and non-humans are more entangled than ever before. It focuses on the Danish national citizens’ climate assembly, which on the one hand appears as a genuine renewal that puts climate first but on the other hand is subject to a human-centered perspective that risks undermining the possibility of sustainability for all. The article examines the tension between these two trends, starting from discussions about the Anthropocene and its significance for democracy and the political. The article is particularly interested in examining how democratic innovations as a citizens’ climate assembly allow the non-human to speak – for example by including animals and plants in the deliberative process – and in this way contribute to a real ecologicalization of democratic deliberation. The article compares this possibility with the results from the research project “Democratic Innovations in a Green Transition,” which over the past three years has closely followed the Danish Citizens’ Climate Assembly through qualitative and quantitative studies. The article uses the results of the studies as a prism for a more general problem: That climate policy is developed and decided through democratic-institutional frameworks that do not align with the changed human-nature relationship that prevails in an Anthropocene world.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
Citizens’ climate assembly, sustainability, and democratic innovation in an Anthropocene world De har en drøm ... Enlightened false consciousness: Why climate consciousness is not followed by action Men, masculinities and climate crisis: An international literature review The long durée: A question of sustainability
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1