Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147331
C. Laustsen
Klimakrisen er en af vor tids største udfordringer. Det er det store flertal af politikere enige om – i Danmark såvel som i udlandet. Og det synspunkt bakker størstedelen af befolkningen også op bag. Det til trods ser vi, at man stadig halter langt bagefter de udledningsmål, vi selv har sat. Hvis vi skal forstå dette, må vi kikke på barrierer – institutionelle såvel som individuelle. Artiklen fokuserer alene på de individuelle og spørger, hvorfor klimabevidsthed ikke følges op af klimahandlen, altså en mere klimavenlig livsstil. Artiklen fokuserer på den stor midtergruppe, som ikke benægter klimaudfordringen (benægterne) og heller ikke engagerer sig politisk i kampen for forandringer (aktivister). Artiklen hævder, at denne midtergruppe er karakteriseret ved en tilstand af ”oplyst falsk bevidsthed”. Man er bevidst om udfordringerne og eget ansvar, men samtidig insisterer man på at leve livet, som man altid har gjort. Problemet er ikke viden, men handling. Den ”falske bevidsthed” manifesterer sig i vores praksis. Der fokuseres først på følelsernes betydning for dette og ikke mindst på, hvordan man gennem moralsk afkobling kan mindske kognitiv dissonans. Det leder videre til en diskussion af psykosociale mønstre, som understøtter vores praksis og ikke mindst vores insisteren på nydelse. Endelig diskuteres, hvordan en grøn identitet i sig selv kan være en måde, hvorpå ens passivitet i forhold til klimaspørgsmålet kan legitimeres.
{"title":"Oplyst falsk bevidsthed. Et essay om individuelle barrierer mod effektiv klimahandlen","authors":"C. Laustsen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147331","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147331","url":null,"abstract":"Klimakrisen er en af vor tids største udfordringer. Det er det store flertal af politikere enige om – i Danmark såvel som i udlandet. Og det synspunkt bakker størstedelen af befolkningen også op bag. Det til trods ser vi, at man stadig halter langt bagefter de udledningsmål, vi selv har sat. Hvis vi skal forstå dette, må vi kikke på barrierer – institutionelle såvel som individuelle. Artiklen fokuserer alene på de individuelle og spørger, hvorfor klimabevidsthed ikke følges op af klimahandlen, altså en mere klimavenlig livsstil. Artiklen fokuserer på den stor midtergruppe, som ikke benægter klimaudfordringen (benægterne) og heller ikke engagerer sig politisk i kampen for forandringer (aktivister). Artiklen hævder, at denne midtergruppe er karakteriseret ved en tilstand af ”oplyst falsk bevidsthed”. Man er bevidst om udfordringerne og eget ansvar, men samtidig insisterer man på at leve livet, som man altid har gjort. Problemet er ikke viden, men handling. Den ”falske bevidsthed” manifesterer sig i vores praksis. Der fokuseres først på følelsernes betydning for dette og ikke mindst på, hvordan man gennem moralsk afkobling kan mindske kognitiv dissonans. Det leder videre til en diskussion af psykosociale mønstre, som understøtter vores praksis og ikke mindst vores insisteren på nydelse. Endelig diskuteres, hvordan en grøn identitet i sig selv kan være en måde, hvorpå ens passivitet i forhold til klimaspørgsmålet kan legitimeres.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141676095","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147336
Andrea Hyldig, Stine Thidemann Faber
Men appear to be less engaged in the climate crisis and the green transition compared to women. In this article, we present a focused literature review of key studies within the field that attempt to explain this gender gap. The purpose of the article is twofold: to introduce and unpack the research field for those who are not familiar with it and to identify and explore the patterns, themes, and contradictions presented in the research literature to critically discuss their contributions.
{"title":"Men, masculinities and climate crisis: An international literature review","authors":"Andrea Hyldig, Stine Thidemann Faber","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147336","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147336","url":null,"abstract":"Men appear to be less engaged in the climate crisis and the green transition compared to women. In this article, we present a focused literature review of key studies within the field that attempt to explain this gender gap. The purpose of the article is twofold: to introduce and unpack the research field for those who are not familiar with it and to identify and explore the patterns, themes, and contradictions presented in the research literature to critically discuss their contributions.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 2","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141675051","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147337
Carsten Bagge Laustsen
The climate crisis is one of the greatest challenges of our time. The vast majority of politicians agree – in Denmark and abroad – as does the majority of the population. Despite this, we are still lagging far behind the emission targets we ourselves have defined. To understand this, we need to look at barriers – both institutional and individual. This article focuses solely on the individual barriers and asks why climate awareness is not followed by climate action, i.e. a more climate-friendly lifestyle. The article focuses on the large middle group who neither deny the climate challenge (deniers) nor engage politically in the fight for change (activists). The article argues that this middle group is characterized by a state of ”enlightened false consciousness”. They are aware of the challenges and their own responsibilities but insist on living life as they always have. The problem is not knowledge, but action. The ”false consciousness” manifests itself in our practice. First, the article focuses on the role of emotions in this and how to reduce cognitive dissonance through mechanisms of moral disengagement. This leads to a discussion of the psychosocial patterns that underpin our practice and not least our insistence on pleasure. And finally, to a discussion of how a green identity itself can be a way to legitimize one’s passivity in relation to the climate issue.
{"title":"Enlightened false consciousness: Why climate consciousness is not followed by action","authors":"Carsten Bagge Laustsen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147337","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147337","url":null,"abstract":"The climate crisis is one of the greatest challenges of our time. The vast majority of politicians agree – in Denmark and abroad – as does the majority of the population. Despite this, we are still lagging far behind the emission targets we ourselves have defined. To understand this, we need to look at barriers – both institutional and individual. This article focuses solely on the individual barriers and asks why climate awareness is not followed by climate action, i.e. a more climate-friendly lifestyle. The article focuses on the large middle group who neither deny the climate challenge (deniers) nor engage politically in the fight for change (activists). The article argues that this middle group is characterized by a state of ”enlightened false consciousness”. They are aware of the challenges and their own responsibilities but insist on living life as they always have. The problem is not knowledge, but action. The ”false consciousness” manifests itself in our practice. First, the article focuses on the role of emotions in this and how to reduce cognitive dissonance through mechanisms of moral disengagement. This leads to a discussion of the psychosocial patterns that underpin our practice and not least our insistence on pleasure. And finally, to a discussion of how a green identity itself can be a way to legitimize one’s passivity in relation to the climate issue.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 8","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141674416","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147334
Morten Greve, Carsten Bagge Laustsen
In the Brundtland Commission’s classic formulation, sustainability is defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Essential to the definition is the emphasis on a long time frame – that we must also consider the possible life situation of future generations. The wording dates back to 1987, and the emphasis on sustainability has only become more relevant with the escalating climate crisis. Also politically. In the first part of the article, we discuss the meta-theoretical foundation of the concept of sustainability – namely the importance of our perception of nature and our time horizons. This discussion is linked to the notion of societal form and, more generally, the question of our modernity. In the second part of the article, we move towards an operational concept of sustainability. In this context, the article’s contribution is to operationalize the concept of sustainability in five dimensions: First, and in a very general sense, it emphasizes the space-time dimension, where the spatial dimension is potentially global, and the temporal dimension potentially infinite. This is followed by four key aspects for defining the content of the concept: self-sustainability, systemic holism, precaution and resilience.
{"title":"The long durée: A question of sustainability","authors":"Morten Greve, Carsten Bagge Laustsen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147334","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147334","url":null,"abstract":"In the Brundtland Commission’s classic formulation, sustainability is defined as development that meets the needs of the present without compromising the ability of future generations to meet their own needs. Essential to the definition is the emphasis on a long time frame – that we must also consider the possible life situation of future generations. The wording dates back to 1987, and the emphasis on sustainability has only become more relevant with the escalating climate crisis. Also politically. In the first part of the article, we discuss the meta-theoretical foundation of the concept of sustainability – namely the importance of our perception of nature and our time horizons. This discussion is linked to the notion of societal form and, more generally, the question of our modernity. In the second part of the article, we move towards an operational concept of sustainability. In this context, the article’s contribution is to operationalize the concept of sustainability in five dimensions: First, and in a very general sense, it emphasizes the space-time dimension, where the spatial dimension is potentially global, and the temporal dimension potentially infinite. This is followed by four key aspects for defining the content of the concept: self-sustainability, systemic holism, precaution and resilience.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 19","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141675780","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338
Lars Tønder
The article contributes to research on sustainability at a time when humans and non-humans are more entangled than ever before. It focuses on the Danish national citizens’ climate assembly, which on the one hand appears as a genuine renewal that puts climate first but on the other hand is subject to a human-centered perspective that risks undermining the possibility of sustainability for all. The article examines the tension between these two trends, starting from discussions about the Anthropocene and its significance for democracy and the political. The article is particularly interested in examining how democratic innovations as a citizens’ climate assembly allow the non-human to speak – for example by including animals and plants in the deliberative process – and in this way contribute to a real ecologicalization of democratic deliberation. The article compares this possibility with the results from the research project “Democratic Innovations in a Green Transition,” which over the past three years has closely followed the Danish Citizens’ Climate Assembly through qualitative and quantitative studies. The article uses the results of the studies as a prism for a more general problem: That climate policy is developed and decided through democratic-institutional frameworks that do not align with the changed human-nature relationship that prevails in an Anthropocene world.
{"title":"Citizens’ climate assembly, sustainability, and democratic innovation in an Anthropocene world","authors":"Lars Tønder","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147338","url":null,"abstract":"The article contributes to research on sustainability at a time when humans and non-humans are more entangled than ever before. It focuses on the Danish national citizens’ climate assembly, which on the one hand appears as a genuine renewal that puts climate first but on the other hand is subject to a human-centered perspective that risks undermining the possibility of sustainability for all. The article examines the tension between these two trends, starting from discussions about the Anthropocene and its significance for democracy and the political. The article is particularly interested in examining how democratic innovations as a citizens’ climate assembly allow the non-human to speak – for example by including animals and plants in the deliberative process – and in this way contribute to a real ecologicalization of democratic deliberation. The article compares this possibility with the results from the research project “Democratic Innovations in a Green Transition,” which over the past three years has closely followed the Danish Citizens’ Climate Assembly through qualitative and quantitative studies. The article uses the results of the studies as a prism for a more general problem: That climate policy is developed and decided through democratic-institutional frameworks that do not align with the changed human-nature relationship that prevails in an Anthropocene world.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 34","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141673355","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147329
M. Greve, C. Laustsen
I Brundtland-kommisionens klassiske formulering defineres bæredygtighed som en udvikling, der opfylder nutidens behov uden at bringe fremtidige generationers muligheder for at opfylde deres behov i fare. Væsentligt i definitionen er betoningen af det lange sigt – at man også må have øje for kommende generationers mulige livssituation. Formuleringen er fra 1987, og betoningen af bæredygtighed er kun senere med den eskalerende klimakrise blevet mere central. Også politisk. Vi indleder med i artiklens første del at diskutere bæredygtighedsbegrebet metateoretiske fundament – nemlig betydningen af vores forestilling om naturen og vores tidshorisonter. Denne diskussion kobles til forestillingen om samfundsform og helt generelt spørgsmålet om vores modernitet. Herefter vil vi i artiklens anden del bevæge os i retning af et operationelt bæredygtighedsbegreb. Artiklens bidrag er i den sammenhæng at operationalisere bæredygtighedsbegrebet i fem dimensioner: For det første og helt overordnet betones tid-rum-udstrækningen, hvor den rumlige potentielt er global, og den tidslige potentielt uendelig. Herefter følger fire centrale aspekter for indholdsbestemmelsen af begrebet: selvopretholdese, systemisk holisme, forsigtighed og resiliens.
{"title":"Det lange sigt. Et spørgsmål om bæredygtighed","authors":"M. Greve, C. Laustsen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147329","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147329","url":null,"abstract":"I Brundtland-kommisionens klassiske formulering defineres bæredygtighed som en udvikling, der opfylder nutidens behov uden at bringe fremtidige generationers muligheder for at opfylde deres behov i fare. Væsentligt i definitionen er betoningen af det lange sigt – at man også må have øje for kommende generationers mulige livssituation. Formuleringen er fra 1987, og betoningen af bæredygtighed er kun senere med den eskalerende klimakrise blevet mere central. Også politisk. Vi indleder med i artiklens første del at diskutere bæredygtighedsbegrebet metateoretiske fundament – nemlig betydningen af vores forestilling om naturen og vores tidshorisonter. Denne diskussion kobles til forestillingen om samfundsform og helt generelt spørgsmålet om vores modernitet. Herefter vil vi i artiklens anden del bevæge os i retning af et operationelt bæredygtighedsbegreb. Artiklens bidrag er i den sammenhæng at operationalisere bæredygtighedsbegrebet i fem dimensioner: For det første og helt overordnet betones tid-rum-udstrækningen, hvor den rumlige potentielt er global, og den tidslige potentielt uendelig. Herefter følger fire centrale aspekter for indholdsbestemmelsen af begrebet: selvopretholdese, systemisk holisme, forsigtighed og resiliens.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 12","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141676932","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147333
S. Larsen
{"title":"De har en drøm ...","authors":"S. Larsen","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147333","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147333","url":null,"abstract":"","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 28","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141673700","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147332
Lars Tønder
Denne artikel bidrager til forskning om bæredygtighed i en tid, hvor det menneskelige og det ikkemenneskelige er mere sammenfiltret end nogensinde før. Artiklen fokuserer på det danske klimaborgerting, som på den ene side fremstår som en reel fornyelse, der sætter klimaet først, men som på den anden side er underlagt et menneskecentreret perspektiv, der risikerer at undergrave muligheden et bæredygtigt samfund. Artiklen undersøger spændingen mellem disse to tendenser med udgangspunkt i diskussioner om det antropocæne og dennes betydning for demokrati og det politiske. Artiklen er særligt interesseret i at undersøge, hvordan demokratiske innovationer som et klimaborgerting lader det ikkemenneskelige komme til orde – fx ved at inddrage dyr og planter i den deliberative proces – og på den måde bidrager til en reel økologisering af den demokratiske samtale. Artiklen sammenholder denne mulighed med resultaterne fra forskningsprojektet ”Democratic innovations in a green transition”, der gennem de seneste tre år har fulgt det danske klimaborgerting tæt gennem kvalitative og kvantitative undersøgelser. Artiklen bruger resultaterne fra undersøgelserne til at vise, at det danske klimaborgertings potentiale forblev uforløst, og at det på den måde fremstår som en prisme for et mere generelt problem: at klimapolitikken udvikles og besluttes gennem demokratiske-institutionelle rammer, som ikke flugter med de ændrede menneske-natur-forhold, der gør sig gældende i en antropocæn verden.
{"title":"Klimaborgerting, bæredygtighed og demokratisk fornyelse i en antropocæn verden","authors":"Lars Tønder","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147332","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147332","url":null,"abstract":"Denne artikel bidrager til forskning om bæredygtighed i en tid, hvor det menneskelige og det ikkemenneskelige er mere sammenfiltret end nogensinde før. Artiklen fokuserer på det danske klimaborgerting, som på den ene side fremstår som en reel fornyelse, der sætter klimaet først, men som på den anden side er underlagt et menneskecentreret perspektiv, der risikerer at undergrave muligheden et bæredygtigt samfund. Artiklen undersøger spændingen mellem disse to tendenser med udgangspunkt i diskussioner om det antropocæne og dennes betydning for demokrati og det politiske. Artiklen er særligt interesseret i at undersøge, hvordan demokratiske innovationer som et klimaborgerting lader det ikkemenneskelige komme til orde – fx ved at inddrage dyr og planter i den deliberative proces – og på den måde bidrager til en reel økologisering af den demokratiske samtale. Artiklen sammenholder denne mulighed med resultaterne fra forskningsprojektet ”Democratic innovations in a green transition”, der gennem de seneste tre år har fulgt det danske klimaborgerting tæt gennem kvalitative og kvantitative undersøgelser. Artiklen bruger resultaterne fra undersøgelserne til at vise, at det danske klimaborgertings potentiale forblev uforløst, og at det på den måde fremstår som en prisme for et mere generelt problem: at klimapolitikken udvikles og besluttes gennem demokratiske-institutionelle rammer, som ikke flugter med de ændrede menneske-natur-forhold, der gør sig gældende i en antropocæn verden.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 17","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141676330","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-07-05DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i2.147330
Andrea Hyldig, Stine Thidemann Faber
Mænd ser ud til at engagere sig mindre i klimakrisen og i den grønne omstilling end kvinder. I artiklen dykker vi ned i et udvalg af centrale studier i den forskningslitteratur, der forsøger at finde forklaringer på denne forskel. Ærindet med artiklen er dels at introducere og udfolde forskningsfeltet for den udefrakommende læser, dels at identificere, udforske og kritisk diskutere forskningslitteraturens bidrag.
{"title":"Mænd, maskuliniteter og klimakrise: en international litteraturgennemgang","authors":"Andrea Hyldig, Stine Thidemann Faber","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i2.147330","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i2.147330","url":null,"abstract":"Mænd ser ud til at engagere sig mindre i klimakrisen og i den grønne omstilling end kvinder. I artiklen dykker vi ned i et udvalg af centrale studier i den forskningslitteratur, der forsøger at finde forklaringer på denne forskel. Ærindet med artiklen er dels at introducere og udfolde forskningsfeltet for den udefrakommende læser, dels at identificere, udforske og kritisk diskutere forskningslitteraturens bidrag.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":" 9","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-07-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"141676020","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
Pub Date : 2024-02-01DOI: 10.7146/politica.v56i1.143240
Asbjørn Skjæveland
Negotiation theory tells us how we should negotiate if we want to negotiate wisely. We learn how to make the cake larger and how to get as big a bite as possible. Negotiations are key in politics. Even so, not many scientific studies apply the negotiation theory framework to legislative negotiations, including Danish legislative negotiations. On the other hand, there is a literature that describes actual legislative negotiations in Denmark. To what extent do the negotiations literature and the described real-life negotiations match each other? Danish politicians can learn from negotiation theory to varying degrees, and negotiation theory can learn from Danish legislative negotiations. The dominant role of the minister in parliamentary negotiations substantially reduces the complexity problems normally associated with multiparty negotiations.
{"title":"Parliamentary negotiations in Denmark","authors":"Asbjørn Skjæveland","doi":"10.7146/politica.v56i1.143240","DOIUrl":"https://doi.org/10.7146/politica.v56i1.143240","url":null,"abstract":"Negotiation theory tells us how we should negotiate if we want to negotiate wisely. We learn how to make the cake larger and how to get as big a bite as possible. Negotiations are key in politics. Even so, not many scientific studies apply the negotiation theory framework to legislative negotiations, including Danish legislative negotiations. On the other hand, there is a literature that describes actual legislative negotiations in Denmark. To what extent do the negotiations literature and the described real-life negotiations match each other? Danish politicians can learn from negotiation theory to varying degrees, and negotiation theory can learn from Danish legislative negotiations. The dominant role of the minister in parliamentary negotiations substantially reduces the complexity problems normally associated with multiparty negotiations.","PeriodicalId":31188,"journal":{"name":"Politica","volume":"71 6","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0,"publicationDate":"2024-02-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":null,"resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":"139873555","PeriodicalName":null,"FirstCategoryId":null,"ListUrlMain":null,"RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":"","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":"","EPubDate":null,"PubModel":null,"JCR":null,"JCRName":null,"Score":null,"Total":0}
京公网安备 11010802042870号
京ICP备2023020795号-1
扫码关注我们
求助内容：
应助结果提醒方式：