提高全球导航卫星系统日边界精确点定位性能的有效方法

IF 2.7 3区 工程技术 Q1 ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Measurement Science and Technology Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1088/1361-6501/ad5de8
Jingxin Xiao, Haojun Li, Yafeng Sun, Xiaolu Liu
{"title":"提高全球导航卫星系统日边界精确点定位性能的有效方法","authors":"Jingxin Xiao, Haojun Li, Yafeng Sun, Xiaolu Liu","doi":"10.1088/1361-6501/ad5de8","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n Aiming to address poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations at the day boundary, which is caused by the discontinuities of their International GNSS Service (IGS) products for two consecutive days, an effective method is proposed to improve the precise point positioning (PPP) performances at the day boundary. According to different orders of Lagrange interpolator and different IGS Analysis Centers (ACs) products of Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WUH), biases at the day boundaries are estimated and analyzed using a 4-day (DOY 94-97, 2022) data set of GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo from 123 IGS stations. These estimated biases show the time-varying characteristics. The differences in biases across 9th-11th orders of Lagrange interpolator are minimal, and these variances have a negligible impact on positioning. The results show that this poor self-consistency at the day boundary has an obvious influence on the kinematic PPP positioning, especially there is a centimeter-level variation at time of 24:00:00/00:00:00. This influence on the Up direction of kinematic PPP positioning is more serious than other directions. When the bias is estimated and corrected, the kinematic PPP positioning accuracies at the day boundary have a mean improvement of 0.043, 0.064 and 0.027m for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively. The mean improvements for GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo are 0.021, 0.062 and 0.051m. Additionally, the static PPP performances at the day boundary show the convergence times are shortened by 3.2, 6.2, and 2.5 minutes for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively, when the poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations is estimated and corrected. Meanwhile, its 0.5 and 1 hour positioning accuracies are improved.","PeriodicalId":18526,"journal":{"name":"Measurement Science and Technology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An effective method for improving GNSS precise point positioning performance at the day boundary\",\"authors\":\"Jingxin Xiao, Haojun Li, Yafeng Sun, Xiaolu Liu\",\"doi\":\"10.1088/1361-6501/ad5de8\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"\\n Aiming to address poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations at the day boundary, which is caused by the discontinuities of their International GNSS Service (IGS) products for two consecutive days, an effective method is proposed to improve the precise point positioning (PPP) performances at the day boundary. According to different orders of Lagrange interpolator and different IGS Analysis Centers (ACs) products of Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WUH), biases at the day boundaries are estimated and analyzed using a 4-day (DOY 94-97, 2022) data set of GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo from 123 IGS stations. These estimated biases show the time-varying characteristics. The differences in biases across 9th-11th orders of Lagrange interpolator are minimal, and these variances have a negligible impact on positioning. The results show that this poor self-consistency at the day boundary has an obvious influence on the kinematic PPP positioning, especially there is a centimeter-level variation at time of 24:00:00/00:00:00. This influence on the Up direction of kinematic PPP positioning is more serious than other directions. When the bias is estimated and corrected, the kinematic PPP positioning accuracies at the day boundary have a mean improvement of 0.043, 0.064 and 0.027m for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively. The mean improvements for GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo are 0.021, 0.062 and 0.051m. Additionally, the static PPP performances at the day boundary show the convergence times are shortened by 3.2, 6.2, and 2.5 minutes for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively, when the poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations is estimated and corrected. Meanwhile, its 0.5 and 1 hour positioning accuracies are improved.\",\"PeriodicalId\":18526,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Measurement Science and Technology\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":2.7000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Measurement Science and Technology\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"5\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad5de8\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"工程技术\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Measurement Science and Technology","FirstCategoryId":"5","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1088/1361-6501/ad5de8","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"工程技术","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ENGINEERING, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

针对卫星时钟和轨道插值在日边界自洽性差的问题,提出了一种有效的方法来改善日边界精确点定位(PPP)的性能,这种自洽性差的问题是由其连续两天的国际全球导航卫星系统服务(IGS)产品的不连续性造成的。根据拉格朗日内插器的不同阶数以及欧洲轨道测定中心(CODE)、德国地质研究中心(GFZ)和武汉大学(WUH)的不同 IGS 分析中心(ACs)的产品,利用来自 123 个 IGS 站点的 GPS、BDS-3 和伽利略的 4 天(DOY 94-97、2022)数据集估算和分析了日边界的偏差。这些估算的偏差显示了时变特征。拉格朗日内插器第 9-11 阶的偏差差异很小,这些差异对定位的影响可以忽略不计。结果表明,日边界自洽性差对运动学 PPP 定位有明显影响,特别是在 24:00:00/00:00:00 时间段存在厘米级变化。这种对运动 PPP 定位向上方向的影响比其他方向更为严重。对偏差进行估计和校正后,WUH、GFZ 和 CODE 在日边界的运动学 PPP 定位精度平均分别提高了 0.043、0.064 和 0.027 米。GPS、BDS-3 和伽利略的平均改进幅度分别为 0.021、0.062 和 0.051 米。此外,日边界静态 PPP 性能表明,在估计和纠正卫星时钟和轨道内插的自洽性较差时,WUH、GFZ 和 CODE 的收敛时间分别缩短了 3.2、6.2 和 2.5 分钟。同时,其 0.5 小时和 1 小时的定位精度也有所提高。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An effective method for improving GNSS precise point positioning performance at the day boundary
Aiming to address poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations at the day boundary, which is caused by the discontinuities of their International GNSS Service (IGS) products for two consecutive days, an effective method is proposed to improve the precise point positioning (PPP) performances at the day boundary. According to different orders of Lagrange interpolator and different IGS Analysis Centers (ACs) products of Center for Orbit Determination in Europe (CODE), GeoForschungsZentrum (GFZ) and Wuhan University (WUH), biases at the day boundaries are estimated and analyzed using a 4-day (DOY 94-97, 2022) data set of GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo from 123 IGS stations. These estimated biases show the time-varying characteristics. The differences in biases across 9th-11th orders of Lagrange interpolator are minimal, and these variances have a negligible impact on positioning. The results show that this poor self-consistency at the day boundary has an obvious influence on the kinematic PPP positioning, especially there is a centimeter-level variation at time of 24:00:00/00:00:00. This influence on the Up direction of kinematic PPP positioning is more serious than other directions. When the bias is estimated and corrected, the kinematic PPP positioning accuracies at the day boundary have a mean improvement of 0.043, 0.064 and 0.027m for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively. The mean improvements for GPS, BDS-3 and Galileo are 0.021, 0.062 and 0.051m. Additionally, the static PPP performances at the day boundary show the convergence times are shortened by 3.2, 6.2, and 2.5 minutes for WUH, GFZ and CODE, respectively, when the poor self-consistency of the satellite clock and orbit interpolations is estimated and corrected. Meanwhile, its 0.5 and 1 hour positioning accuracies are improved.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Measurement Science and Technology
Measurement Science and Technology 工程技术-工程:综合
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
16.70%
发文量
656
审稿时长
4.9 months
期刊介绍: Measurement Science and Technology publishes articles on new measurement techniques and associated instrumentation. Papers that describe experiments must represent an advance in measurement science or measurement technique rather than the application of established experimental technique. Bearing in mind the multidisciplinary nature of the journal, authors must provide an introduction to their work that makes clear the novelty, significance, broader relevance of their work in a measurement context and relevance to the readership of Measurement Science and Technology. All submitted articles should contain consideration of the uncertainty, precision and/or accuracy of the measurements presented. Subject coverage includes the theory, practice and application of measurement in physics, chemistry, engineering and the environmental and life sciences from inception to commercial exploitation. Publications in the journal should emphasize the novelty of reported methods, characterize them and demonstrate their performance using examples or applications.
期刊最新文献
Morphological characterization of concave particle based on convex decomposition TSMDA: intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling bearing with two stage multi-source domain adaptation Precise orbit determination of integrated BDS-3 and LEO satellites with ambiguity fixing under regional ground stations High-accuracy and lightweight weld surface defect detector based on graph convolution decoupling head Gap Measurement Method Based on Projection Lines and Convex Analysis of 3D Points Cloud
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1