南非社会补助金的悖论:COVID-19 社会救济金案例

R. Kajiita, S. Kang’ethe
{"title":"南非社会补助金的悖论:COVID-19 社会救济金案例","authors":"R. Kajiita, S. Kang’ethe","doi":"10.38159/ehass.2024577","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"South Africa is largely a welfare state because of its extensive social welfare grants. Almost half of the South African population benefits from social welfare grants. Through a literature review analysis, this paper focused on the special COVID-19 grant, also known as the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant. The paper analysed technical reports, working papers from reputable institutions and journal articles on social grants in South Africa. The analysis revealed that social grants in general enable the beneficiaries to access basic needs such as food and clothing; improve living standards; and alleviate poverty. The analysis also showed that the COVID-19 grants reached the previously unreached segment of the population, provided funds for seeking employment; supported childcare; and enhanced digital skills. The provision of SRD was found to be plagued with corruption, lack of capacity of administrative units, and emerging dependence. There is high support for extending and sustaining the grant, while other sources decry the potential of the grant to promote unproductive behaviour among young people, who should be actively involved in the labour market. The paper recommends an objective evaluation of the SRD grant to counter unpleasant socio-economic spillovers and promote the intended purpose. This paper contributes to the scholarship on remedial and developmental welfare in South Africa, with possible lessons for other welfare states globally.\n\nKeywords: Social Grants, Dependence syndrome, COVID-19, Grant sustainability, welfare state, unemployment, poverty","PeriodicalId":505540,"journal":{"name":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","volume":"2 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Paradoxes of Social Grants in South Africa: The Case of COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress Grant\",\"authors\":\"R. Kajiita, S. Kang’ethe\",\"doi\":\"10.38159/ehass.2024577\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"South Africa is largely a welfare state because of its extensive social welfare grants. Almost half of the South African population benefits from social welfare grants. Through a literature review analysis, this paper focused on the special COVID-19 grant, also known as the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant. The paper analysed technical reports, working papers from reputable institutions and journal articles on social grants in South Africa. The analysis revealed that social grants in general enable the beneficiaries to access basic needs such as food and clothing; improve living standards; and alleviate poverty. The analysis also showed that the COVID-19 grants reached the previously unreached segment of the population, provided funds for seeking employment; supported childcare; and enhanced digital skills. The provision of SRD was found to be plagued with corruption, lack of capacity of administrative units, and emerging dependence. There is high support for extending and sustaining the grant, while other sources decry the potential of the grant to promote unproductive behaviour among young people, who should be actively involved in the labour market. The paper recommends an objective evaluation of the SRD grant to counter unpleasant socio-economic spillovers and promote the intended purpose. This paper contributes to the scholarship on remedial and developmental welfare in South Africa, with possible lessons for other welfare states globally.\\n\\nKeywords: Social Grants, Dependence syndrome, COVID-19, Grant sustainability, welfare state, unemployment, poverty\",\"PeriodicalId\":505540,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences\",\"volume\":\"2 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"1\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024577\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"E-Journal of Humanities, Arts and Social Sciences","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.38159/ehass.2024577","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

摘要

南非在很大程度上是一个福利国家,因为它有大量的社会福利补助金。近一半的南非人口受益于社会福利补助金。通过文献回顾分析,本文重点关注 COVID-19 特别补助金,也称为社会救济金(SRD)。本文分析了有关南非社会补助金的技术报告、知名机构的工作文件和期刊文章。分析表明,社会补助金总体上使受益人能够获得食物和衣服等基本需求,提高生活水平,减轻贫困。分析还表明,COVID-19 补助金惠及了以前未惠及的部分人口,提供了求职资金,支持了儿童保育,并提高了数字技能。研究发现,提供自力更生部门的工作存在腐败、行政单位能力不足以及新出现的依赖性等问题。有很多人支持延长和维持该补助金,但也有一些人谴责该补助金可能会助长本应积极参与劳动力市场的年轻人的非生产性行为。本文建议对 SRD 补助金进行客观评估,以消除令人不快的社会经济溢出效应,促进预期目的的实现。本文为南非的补救性和发展性福利学术研究做出了贡献,并可能为全球其他福利国家提供借鉴:社会补助金、依赖综合症、COVID-19、补助金可持续性、福利国家、失业、贫困
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Paradoxes of Social Grants in South Africa: The Case of COVID-19 Social Relief of Distress Grant
South Africa is largely a welfare state because of its extensive social welfare grants. Almost half of the South African population benefits from social welfare grants. Through a literature review analysis, this paper focused on the special COVID-19 grant, also known as the Social Relief of Distress (SRD) grant. The paper analysed technical reports, working papers from reputable institutions and journal articles on social grants in South Africa. The analysis revealed that social grants in general enable the beneficiaries to access basic needs such as food and clothing; improve living standards; and alleviate poverty. The analysis also showed that the COVID-19 grants reached the previously unreached segment of the population, provided funds for seeking employment; supported childcare; and enhanced digital skills. The provision of SRD was found to be plagued with corruption, lack of capacity of administrative units, and emerging dependence. There is high support for extending and sustaining the grant, while other sources decry the potential of the grant to promote unproductive behaviour among young people, who should be actively involved in the labour market. The paper recommends an objective evaluation of the SRD grant to counter unpleasant socio-economic spillovers and promote the intended purpose. This paper contributes to the scholarship on remedial and developmental welfare in South Africa, with possible lessons for other welfare states globally. Keywords: Social Grants, Dependence syndrome, COVID-19, Grant sustainability, welfare state, unemployment, poverty
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Bars of Suffocation: A Critical Review of the Covid-19 Pandemic and its Effect on Correctional Facilities in South Africa ICT Adoption and Improving Service Delivery within the Municipalities of the North-West Province, South Africa The Relevance of Tselane le Dimo Folktale in the Life of the Current Generation Exploring the Role of Women in Gender-Based Violence: Deconstructing the One-sided Narrative in Bityi, Eastern Cape, South Africa Partnership Building in Public Policing: Communities’ Perceptions towards the Role of Community Policing Forums in Mthatha, Eastern Cape, South Africa
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1