齐奥塞斯库时期罗马尼亚文化遗产的工具化

Q2 Arts and Humanities Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.36941/ajis-2024-0095
Alin Rus
{"title":"齐奥塞斯库时期罗马尼亚文化遗产的工具化","authors":"Alin Rus","doi":"10.36941/ajis-2024-0095","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article analyzes the heritagisation policies and the instrumentalization of cultural heritage by Ceausescu's regime for political purposes. I argue that Ceausescu’s political regime was neopatrimonial, a system where rules took place within the framework of legal bureaucracy of a modern state in which formal structures and rules did exist, although in practice, the separation of the private and public sphere was not always observed. This system was characterized by insecurity about the behavior and role of state institutions, but primarily the actions of the supreme leader that were erratic and unpredictable. In this regime, the rural cultural heritage was used for political-ideological purposes, in close connection with the cult of the personality of the supreme leader. In this context, the heritigisation of folk creations such as folk plays did not mean the preservation of these rural cultural forms under threat in a society undergoing major economic and social transformations that imperiled traditional community life. Instead, it was a form of symbolic political manipulation used to acquire political legitimacy. \n \nReceived: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 02 July 2024","PeriodicalId":37106,"journal":{"name":"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","volume":"62 11","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"The Instrumentalization of Cultural Heritage in Ceausescu’s Romania\",\"authors\":\"Alin Rus\",\"doi\":\"10.36941/ajis-2024-0095\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"This article analyzes the heritagisation policies and the instrumentalization of cultural heritage by Ceausescu's regime for political purposes. I argue that Ceausescu’s political regime was neopatrimonial, a system where rules took place within the framework of legal bureaucracy of a modern state in which formal structures and rules did exist, although in practice, the separation of the private and public sphere was not always observed. This system was characterized by insecurity about the behavior and role of state institutions, but primarily the actions of the supreme leader that were erratic and unpredictable. In this regime, the rural cultural heritage was used for political-ideological purposes, in close connection with the cult of the personality of the supreme leader. In this context, the heritigisation of folk creations such as folk plays did not mean the preservation of these rural cultural forms under threat in a society undergoing major economic and social transformations that imperiled traditional community life. Instead, it was a form of symbolic political manipulation used to acquire political legitimacy. \\n \\nReceived: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 02 July 2024\",\"PeriodicalId\":37106,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies\",\"volume\":\"62 11\",\"pages\":\"\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0095\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"Arts and Humanities\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2024-0095","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Arts and Humanities","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

本文分析了齐奥塞斯库政权的遗产化政策以及出于政治目的对文化遗产的利用。我认为,齐奥塞斯库的政治体制是新世袭制,是一种在现代国家的法律官僚框架内制定规则的体制,其中确实存在正式的结构和规则,尽管在实践中,私人领域和公共领域的分离并不总是得到遵守。这种制度的特点是对国家机构的行为和作用缺乏安全感,但主要是最高领导人的行动反复无常、难以预测。在这种体制下,农村文化遗产被用于政治意识形态目的,与最高领导人的个人崇拜密切相关。在这种情况下,民间戏剧等民间创作的遗产化并不意味着要保护这些在经历重大经济和社会变革、危及传统社区生活的社会中受到威胁的农村文化形式。相反,这是一种象征性的政治操纵形式,用来获取政治合法性。 收到:收到:2024 年 1 月 17 日 / 接受:2024 年 5 月 29 日 / 发表:2024 年 7 月 2 日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
The Instrumentalization of Cultural Heritage in Ceausescu’s Romania
This article analyzes the heritagisation policies and the instrumentalization of cultural heritage by Ceausescu's regime for political purposes. I argue that Ceausescu’s political regime was neopatrimonial, a system where rules took place within the framework of legal bureaucracy of a modern state in which formal structures and rules did exist, although in practice, the separation of the private and public sphere was not always observed. This system was characterized by insecurity about the behavior and role of state institutions, but primarily the actions of the supreme leader that were erratic and unpredictable. In this regime, the rural cultural heritage was used for political-ideological purposes, in close connection with the cult of the personality of the supreme leader. In this context, the heritigisation of folk creations such as folk plays did not mean the preservation of these rural cultural forms under threat in a society undergoing major economic and social transformations that imperiled traditional community life. Instead, it was a form of symbolic political manipulation used to acquire political legitimacy.    Received: 17 January 2024 / Accepted: 29 May 2024 / Published: 02 July 2024
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies
Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies Social Sciences-Social Sciences (all)
CiteScore
1.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
171
期刊最新文献
Economic Liberalization and Bank Fragility: Empirical Evidence from ASEAN Countries University Students’ Intentions to Develop Competences and its Influencing Factors: A Nigerian Context Entrepreneurship and Project Management: An Empirical Study of the Success of Entrepreneurial Projects in the Colombian Context Virtual Education and Post-Pandemic Academic Performance in University Students Bibliometric Profile of the Literature on Psychological Wellbeing in Women who Suffer Violence 2010-2024
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1