性贩运与技术:对招募和剥削的系统回顾

Q1 Social Sciences Journal of Human Trafficking Pub Date : 2024-07-02 DOI:10.1080/23322705.2022.2034378
Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons
{"title":"性贩运与技术:对招募和剥削的系统回顾","authors":"Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons","doi":"10.1080/23322705.2022.2034378","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT With passage of Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Traffickers Act and Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (FOSTA-SESTA) in 2018, technology became inextricably linked to sex trafficking in the United States (U.S.) public policy arena. FOSTA-SESTA aimed to combat sex trafficking by legislating digital spaces; however, largely missing from legislative debate was the inclusion of prevalence data to inform this policy making. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing empirical evidence on online-facilitated sex trafficking. Twenty-one articles were included in this systematic review, of which the vast majority focused on the U.S. and domestically trafficked youth. Findings indicate very few empirically documented cases of online-facilitated recruitment of victims for the purpose of sexual exploitation. Greater empirical evidence exists for trafficked persons advertised online for sexual exploitation; however, the person posting these advertisements (e.g., self, friend, trafficker) varies. Overall, the actual prevalence of online-facilitated trafficking remains unknown, suggesting the need for rigorous and large-scale representative studies. Opportunities for leveraging technology to support survivors and service organizations are discussed. In contrast to sweeping legislation that targets web platform providers, policy is needed that reduces structural risk factors to prevent exploitation and trafficking.","PeriodicalId":37076,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Human Trafficking","volume":"42 5","pages":"497 - 511"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"6","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Sex Trafficking and Technology: A Systematic Review of Recruitment and Exploitation\",\"authors\":\"Lindsay B. Gezinski, K. Gonzalez-Pons\",\"doi\":\"10.1080/23322705.2022.2034378\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"ABSTRACT With passage of Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Traffickers Act and Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (FOSTA-SESTA) in 2018, technology became inextricably linked to sex trafficking in the United States (U.S.) public policy arena. FOSTA-SESTA aimed to combat sex trafficking by legislating digital spaces; however, largely missing from legislative debate was the inclusion of prevalence data to inform this policy making. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing empirical evidence on online-facilitated sex trafficking. Twenty-one articles were included in this systematic review, of which the vast majority focused on the U.S. and domestically trafficked youth. Findings indicate very few empirically documented cases of online-facilitated recruitment of victims for the purpose of sexual exploitation. Greater empirical evidence exists for trafficked persons advertised online for sexual exploitation; however, the person posting these advertisements (e.g., self, friend, trafficker) varies. Overall, the actual prevalence of online-facilitated trafficking remains unknown, suggesting the need for rigorous and large-scale representative studies. Opportunities for leveraging technology to support survivors and service organizations are discussed. In contrast to sweeping legislation that targets web platform providers, policy is needed that reduces structural risk factors to prevent exploitation and trafficking.\",\"PeriodicalId\":37076,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Journal of Human Trafficking\",\"volume\":\"42 5\",\"pages\":\"497 - 511\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-02\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"6\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Journal of Human Trafficking\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2022.2034378\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"Social Sciences\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Human Trafficking","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/23322705.2022.2034378","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 6

摘要

ABSTRACT 随着 2018 年《允许各州和受害者打击网络性贩运者法案》和《停止助长性贩运者法案》(FOSTA-SESTA)的通过,在美国(U.S. )公共政策领域,技术与性贩运密不可分。FOSTA-SESTA 法案旨在通过对数字空间进行立法来打击性交易;然而,在立法辩论中基本上没有纳入流行率数据来为这一政策的制定提供依据。因此,本系统性综述的目的是综合现有的由网络促成的性交易的实证证据。本系统性综述共收录了 21 篇文章,其中绝大多数文章关注美国和国内被贩运的青少年。研究结果表明,网上协助招募受害者进行性剥削的实证案例极少。关于被贩运者在网上发布性剥削广告的经验证据较多;但是,发布这些广告的人(如自己、朋友、贩运者)各不相同。总体而言,网上协助贩运的实际发生率仍然未知,这表明需要进行严格的大规模代表性研究。讨论了利用技术为幸存者和服务机构提供支持的机会。与针对网络平台提供商的全面立法不同,需要制定减少结构性风险因素的政策,以防止剥削和贩运。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Sex Trafficking and Technology: A Systematic Review of Recruitment and Exploitation
ABSTRACT With passage of Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Traffickers Act and Stop Enabling Sex Traffickers Act (FOSTA-SESTA) in 2018, technology became inextricably linked to sex trafficking in the United States (U.S.) public policy arena. FOSTA-SESTA aimed to combat sex trafficking by legislating digital spaces; however, largely missing from legislative debate was the inclusion of prevalence data to inform this policy making. Therefore, the purpose of this systematic review was to synthesize the existing empirical evidence on online-facilitated sex trafficking. Twenty-one articles were included in this systematic review, of which the vast majority focused on the U.S. and domestically trafficked youth. Findings indicate very few empirically documented cases of online-facilitated recruitment of victims for the purpose of sexual exploitation. Greater empirical evidence exists for trafficked persons advertised online for sexual exploitation; however, the person posting these advertisements (e.g., self, friend, trafficker) varies. Overall, the actual prevalence of online-facilitated trafficking remains unknown, suggesting the need for rigorous and large-scale representative studies. Opportunities for leveraging technology to support survivors and service organizations are discussed. In contrast to sweeping legislation that targets web platform providers, policy is needed that reduces structural risk factors to prevent exploitation and trafficking.
求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Human Trafficking
Journal of Human Trafficking Social Sciences-Anthropology
CiteScore
3.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
期刊最新文献
Preventing the Trafficking of Youth: A Retrospective Evaluation of kNow MORE! An Educational Program in San Diego, California A Scoping Review of Labor and Organ Trafficking Resources for U.S. Healthcare Professionals Trafficking in Antiblackness: Modern-Day Slavery, White Indemnity, and Racial Justice Trafficking in Antiblackness: Modern-Day Slavery, White Indemnity, and Racial Justice , by Lyndsey P. Beutin, Durham and London, Duke University Press, 2023, 269 pp., $25.60 (ebook), ISBN 9781478024354 Sex Trafficking and Technology: A Systematic Review of Recruitment and Exploitation The Trafficking of Children: International Law, Modern Slavery, and the Anti-Trafficking Machine The Trafficking of Children: International Law, Modern Slavery, and the Anti-Trafficking Machine , by Elizabeth A. Faulkner, Switzerland, Palgrave Macmillan, 2023, 354 pp., €96.29 (ebook), ISBN 978-3-0
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1