针对成人 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病和持续葡萄糖监测联合教育计划

Nanna Lind , Merete Bechmann Christensen , Kirsten Nørgaard
{"title":"针对成人 2 型糖尿病患者的糖尿病和持续葡萄糖监测联合教育计划","authors":"Nanna Lind ,&nbsp;Merete Bechmann Christensen ,&nbsp;Kirsten Nørgaard","doi":"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100324","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The lack of descriptions for education programs in studies evaluating the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for individuals with T2DM makes it difficult to compare results across trials. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new education program for adults with insulin-treated T2DM and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol (7.5 %) initiating CGM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 3-h education program was created to provide information on diabetes self-management and CGM or BGM based on international guidelines and a pre-evaluation based on user needs assessment. Questionnaires were used to post-evaluate participant-rated benefits from the program.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven individuals attended a user needs assessment of the program and 96 participated in the final education program (61.5 % men, mean age 61 (59.5;63) years, mean diabetes duration 18.2 (16.9;19.5) years, and median HbA1c 69 (63–78)mmol/mol (8.5 (7.9–9.3)%). Benefit from this program was rated good/very good by 95.5 % with no statistically significant difference between glucose monitoring groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study presents a new well-received education program for T2DM for both the CGM and BGM group.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>The description of the development process and the education provided for both glucose monitoring groups may be useful for CGM initiation in clinics and trials.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":74407,"journal":{"name":"PEC innovation","volume":"5 ","pages":"Article 100324"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000724/pdfft?md5=e9b735fec2e33a8163701aef2d32c936&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000724-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"A combined diabetes and continuous glucose monitoring education program for adults with type 2 diabetes\",\"authors\":\"Nanna Lind ,&nbsp;Merete Bechmann Christensen ,&nbsp;Kirsten Nørgaard\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.pecinn.2024.100324\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Objective</h3><p>The lack of descriptions for education programs in studies evaluating the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for individuals with T2DM makes it difficult to compare results across trials. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new education program for adults with insulin-treated T2DM and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol (7.5 %) initiating CGM.</p></div><div><h3>Methods</h3><p>A 3-h education program was created to provide information on diabetes self-management and CGM or BGM based on international guidelines and a pre-evaluation based on user needs assessment. Questionnaires were used to post-evaluate participant-rated benefits from the program.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>Seven individuals attended a user needs assessment of the program and 96 participated in the final education program (61.5 % men, mean age 61 (59.5;63) years, mean diabetes duration 18.2 (16.9;19.5) years, and median HbA1c 69 (63–78)mmol/mol (8.5 (7.9–9.3)%). Benefit from this program was rated good/very good by 95.5 % with no statistically significant difference between glucose monitoring groups.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>This study presents a new well-received education program for T2DM for both the CGM and BGM group.</p></div><div><h3>Innovation</h3><p>The description of the development process and the education provided for both glucose monitoring groups may be useful for CGM initiation in clinics and trials.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":74407,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"PEC innovation\",\"volume\":\"5 \",\"pages\":\"Article 100324\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":0.0000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-15\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000724/pdfft?md5=e9b735fec2e33a8163701aef2d32c936&pid=1-s2.0-S2772628224000724-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"PEC innovation\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000724\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"\",\"JCRName\":\"\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PEC innovation","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2772628224000724","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

目的在评估连续血糖监测(CGM)与血糖监测(BGM)对 T2DM 患者疗效的研究中,缺乏对教育计划的描述,因此很难比较不同试验的结果。本研究旨在为接受胰岛素治疗且 HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol (7.5 %) 的 T2DM 成年人开发和评估一项新的教育计划,帮助他们开始使用 CGM。结果7人参加了该计划的用户需求评估,96人参加了最终的教育计划(61.5%为男性,平均年龄61 (59.5;63)岁,平均糖尿病病程18.2 (16.9;19.5)年,HbA1c中位数69 (63-78)mmol/mol (8.5 (7.9-9.3)%)。95.5%的受访者对该项目给予了 "好"/"非常好 "的评价,血糖监测组之间的差异无统计学意义。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
A combined diabetes and continuous glucose monitoring education program for adults with type 2 diabetes

Objective

The lack of descriptions for education programs in studies evaluating the efficacy of continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) compared to blood glucose monitoring (BGM) for individuals with T2DM makes it difficult to compare results across trials. This study aimed to develop and evaluate a new education program for adults with insulin-treated T2DM and HbA1c ≥58 mmol/mol (7.5 %) initiating CGM.

Methods

A 3-h education program was created to provide information on diabetes self-management and CGM or BGM based on international guidelines and a pre-evaluation based on user needs assessment. Questionnaires were used to post-evaluate participant-rated benefits from the program.

Results

Seven individuals attended a user needs assessment of the program and 96 participated in the final education program (61.5 % men, mean age 61 (59.5;63) years, mean diabetes duration 18.2 (16.9;19.5) years, and median HbA1c 69 (63–78)mmol/mol (8.5 (7.9–9.3)%). Benefit from this program was rated good/very good by 95.5 % with no statistically significant difference between glucose monitoring groups.

Conclusions

This study presents a new well-received education program for T2DM for both the CGM and BGM group.

Innovation

The description of the development process and the education provided for both glucose monitoring groups may be useful for CGM initiation in clinics and trials.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
PEC innovation
PEC innovation Medicine and Dentistry (General)
CiteScore
0.80
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
147 days
期刊最新文献
Measuring professionals' attitudes toward persistent somatic symptoms: Development, validation, and reliability of the professionals' Attitude to Persistent Somatic Symptoms Questionnaire (PAPSS) Tech + touch: A pilot study to facilitate access to health information technology for Spanish-speaking parents Single-encounter elicitation framework for diagnostic excellence patient-reported measures: SEE-Dx-PRM The effectiveness of integrating making every contact count into an undergraduate medical curriculum How often are patients recording their healthcare consultations in Australia and why? An online survey
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1