教师和学生能否从 ChatGPT 3.5 的 NCLEX 备考中获益?

IF 1.9 Q2 NURSING Teaching and Learning in Nursing Pub Date : 2024-07-10 DOI:10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.004
Laura C. Sessions PhD, MScN, RN, CNE, Michelle Ness PhD, MSN, RN
{"title":"教师和学生能否从 ChatGPT 3.5 的 NCLEX 备考中获益?","authors":"Laura C. Sessions PhD, MScN, RN, CNE,&nbsp;Michelle Ness PhD, MSN, RN","doi":"10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Artificial intelligence platforms, such as ChatGPT 3.5, can provide an opportunity to support faculty and students in the effort to prepare students for the NextGen (NGN) National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX). Evaluation of the software uncovered strategies to support faculty in using CHATGPT 3.5 to generate NCLEX style questions, but not all NGN item types were supported. The current limitations of the software require faculty to carefully evaluate and revise the ChatGPT 3.5 output before student use, as the questions derived often lacked rigor and were written at the knowledge level. Based on these limitations, it is not recommended that students use the software independently. Faculty can support student use of ChatGPT 3.5 by creating guidelines for use of the product that include independent student verification of the accuracy of the ChatGPT 3.5 output.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":46287,"journal":{"name":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","volume":"19 4","pages":"Pages 356-359"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Can Faculty and Students Benefit From ChatGPT 3.5 for NCLEX Preparation?\",\"authors\":\"Laura C. Sessions PhD, MScN, RN, CNE,&nbsp;Michelle Ness PhD, MSN, RN\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.teln.2024.06.004\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Artificial intelligence platforms, such as ChatGPT 3.5, can provide an opportunity to support faculty and students in the effort to prepare students for the NextGen (NGN) National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX). Evaluation of the software uncovered strategies to support faculty in using CHATGPT 3.5 to generate NCLEX style questions, but not all NGN item types were supported. The current limitations of the software require faculty to carefully evaluate and revise the ChatGPT 3.5 output before student use, as the questions derived often lacked rigor and were written at the knowledge level. Based on these limitations, it is not recommended that students use the software independently. Faculty can support student use of ChatGPT 3.5 by creating guidelines for use of the product that include independent student verification of the accuracy of the ChatGPT 3.5 output.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":46287,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"volume\":\"19 4\",\"pages\":\"Pages 356-359\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.9000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-10\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Teaching and Learning in Nursing\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"1085\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001252\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Teaching and Learning in Nursing","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1557308724001252","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

人工智能平台(如 ChatGPT 3.5)可以为教师和学生提供支持,帮助他们为下一代(NGN)全国委员会执照考试(NCLEX)做准备。对该软件的评估发现了支持教师使用 CHATGPT 3.5 生成 NCLEX 样式问题的策略,但并非所有 NGN 项目类型都支持。该软件目前的局限性要求教师在学生使用之前仔细评估和修改 ChatGPT 3.5 的输出,因为生成的问题往往缺乏严谨性,而且是在知识层面编写的。基于这些局限性,不建议学生独立使用该软件。教师可以通过制定产品使用指南来支持学生使用 ChatGPT 3.5,其中包括让学生独立验证 ChatGPT 3.5 输出的准确性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Can Faculty and Students Benefit From ChatGPT 3.5 for NCLEX Preparation?

Artificial intelligence platforms, such as ChatGPT 3.5, can provide an opportunity to support faculty and students in the effort to prepare students for the NextGen (NGN) National Council Licensure Examination (NCLEX). Evaluation of the software uncovered strategies to support faculty in using CHATGPT 3.5 to generate NCLEX style questions, but not all NGN item types were supported. The current limitations of the software require faculty to carefully evaluate and revise the ChatGPT 3.5 output before student use, as the questions derived often lacked rigor and were written at the knowledge level. Based on these limitations, it is not recommended that students use the software independently. Faculty can support student use of ChatGPT 3.5 by creating guidelines for use of the product that include independent student verification of the accuracy of the ChatGPT 3.5 output.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
10.50%
发文量
119
审稿时长
37 days
期刊介绍: Teaching and Learning in Nursing is the Official Journal of the National Organization of Associate Degree Nursing. The journal is dedicated to the advancement of Associate Degree Nursing education and practice, and promotes collaboration in charting the future of health care education and delivery. Topics include: - Managing Different Learning Styles - New Faculty Mentoring - Legal Issues - Research - Legislative Issues - Instructional Design Strategies - Leadership, Management Roles - Unique Funding for Programs and Faculty
期刊最新文献
Perception of caring behaviors of faculty members from the perspective of nursing students The Urgency of Teaching Theory in the Current Nursing Education Landscape OADN's Milestone Anniversary: Celebrating 40 Years of Advocacy, Education, and Leadership Nurse Educators’ Perspectives in Facilitating Ethics Education: A Descriptive Qualitative Study Implementing Entrustable Professional Activities in a pre-licensure nursing program to facilitate competency-based education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1