对护理专业学生在 "患者安全电子学习模块 "中的表现和满意度的研究

IF 1.6 4区 医学 Q2 NURSING Collegian Pub Date : 2024-07-09 DOI:10.1016/j.colegn.2024.06.003
Tracy Levett-Jones , Fiona Bogossian , Simon Cooper , Ruben Hopmans , Lisa McKenna , Huy Nguyen , Jacqui Pich , Philippa Seaton
{"title":"对护理专业学生在 \"患者安全电子学习模块 \"中的表现和满意度的研究","authors":"Tracy Levett-Jones ,&nbsp;Fiona Bogossian ,&nbsp;Simon Cooper ,&nbsp;Ruben Hopmans ,&nbsp;Lisa McKenna ,&nbsp;Huy Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jacqui Pich ,&nbsp;Philippa Seaton","doi":"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.06.003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The knowledge nursing students acquire during their undergraduate degree influences the quality of patient care they provide for many years to come. However, previous studies indicate that students may have a limited understanding of core patient safety concepts.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to (i) examine nursing students’ performance in an interactive patient safety e-learning module titled ‘<em>One shift, four patients … a day in the life of a new graduate nurse’</em>; and (ii) explore students’ level of satisfaction with the module using the <em>Satisfaction with the Patient Safety E-Learning Module</em> scale.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional design was used with students’ knowledge and levels of satisfaction examined using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>In total, 1038 third-year undergraduate nursing students from 22 Australian universities attempted the module.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean correct score was 74%, but there were significant differences in knowledge levels evident across the four activities that comprised the module. Participants achieved the highest mean score in Activity 2 (Predicting, monitoring, and responding to adverse events [79%]) and the lowest in Activity 3 (Clinical reasoning [66%]). The mean score for Activity 1 (Infection control and medication safety) was 74%, and for Activity 4 (Cultural competence), the score was 77%.</p><p>The level of student satisfaction with the module was high with responses to each survey item exceeding 4.0 out of 5.0. The Cronbach’s alpha for the satisfaction scale was 0.99, and the Content Validity Index was &gt;0.9.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Universities are responsible for preparing nursing students to become safe clinicians. The results from this study indicate that participants’ overall level of knowledge of key patient safety concepts was adequate. However, as knowledge is the foundation for safe practice, these results suggest that further attention to imbedding patient safety in nursing curricula is required.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":55241,"journal":{"name":"Collegian","volume":"31 5","pages":"Pages 327-332"},"PeriodicalIF":1.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-09","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000386/pdfft?md5=c8108d228bc5fd373240be14048ff6bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000386-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"An examination of nursing students’ performance in and Satisfaction with a Patient Safety E-Learning Module\",\"authors\":\"Tracy Levett-Jones ,&nbsp;Fiona Bogossian ,&nbsp;Simon Cooper ,&nbsp;Ruben Hopmans ,&nbsp;Lisa McKenna ,&nbsp;Huy Nguyen ,&nbsp;Jacqui Pich ,&nbsp;Philippa Seaton\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.colegn.2024.06.003\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The knowledge nursing students acquire during their undergraduate degree influences the quality of patient care they provide for many years to come. However, previous studies indicate that students may have a limited understanding of core patient safety concepts.</p></div><div><h3>Objectives</h3><p>The objectives of this study were to (i) examine nursing students’ performance in an interactive patient safety e-learning module titled ‘<em>One shift, four patients … a day in the life of a new graduate nurse’</em>; and (ii) explore students’ level of satisfaction with the module using the <em>Satisfaction with the Patient Safety E-Learning Module</em> scale.</p></div><div><h3>Design</h3><p>A cross-sectional design was used with students’ knowledge and levels of satisfaction examined using descriptive statistics.</p></div><div><h3>Setting and participants</h3><p>In total, 1038 third-year undergraduate nursing students from 22 Australian universities attempted the module.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>The mean correct score was 74%, but there were significant differences in knowledge levels evident across the four activities that comprised the module. Participants achieved the highest mean score in Activity 2 (Predicting, monitoring, and responding to adverse events [79%]) and the lowest in Activity 3 (Clinical reasoning [66%]). The mean score for Activity 1 (Infection control and medication safety) was 74%, and for Activity 4 (Cultural competence), the score was 77%.</p><p>The level of student satisfaction with the module was high with responses to each survey item exceeding 4.0 out of 5.0. The Cronbach’s alpha for the satisfaction scale was 0.99, and the Content Validity Index was &gt;0.9.</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>Universities are responsible for preparing nursing students to become safe clinicians. The results from this study indicate that participants’ overall level of knowledge of key patient safety concepts was adequate. However, as knowledge is the foundation for safe practice, these results suggest that further attention to imbedding patient safety in nursing curricula is required.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":55241,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Collegian\",\"volume\":\"31 5\",\"pages\":\"Pages 327-332\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-09\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000386/pdfft?md5=c8108d228bc5fd373240be14048ff6bc&pid=1-s2.0-S1322769624000386-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Collegian\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000386\",\"RegionNum\":4,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"NURSING\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Collegian","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1322769624000386","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"NURSING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

背景护理专业学生在攻读本科学位期间所掌握的知识影响着他们今后多年为患者提供护理服务的质量。本研究的目的是:(i) 考察护理专业学生在名为 "一个班次,四个病人......新毕业护士的一天 "的互动式患者安全电子学习模块中的表现;(ii) 使用患者安全电子学习模块满意度量表考察学生对该模块的满意程度。设计采用横断面设计,使用描述性统计对学生的知识水平和满意度进行考察。学员在活动 2(不良事件的预测、监测和应对[79%])中的平均得分最高,而在活动 3(临床推理[66%])中的得分最低。活动 1(感染控制和用药安全)的平均得分率为 74%,活动 4(文化能力)的得分率为 77%。学生对该模块的满意度很高,对每个调查项目的回答都超过了 4.0(满分 5.0)。满意度量表的 Cronbach's alpha 为 0.99,内容效度指数为 0.9。本研究结果表明,参与者对主要患者安全概念的总体认知水平是足够的。然而,由于知识是安全实践的基础,这些结果表明需要进一步关注将患者安全纳入护理课程。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
An examination of nursing students’ performance in and Satisfaction with a Patient Safety E-Learning Module

Background

The knowledge nursing students acquire during their undergraduate degree influences the quality of patient care they provide for many years to come. However, previous studies indicate that students may have a limited understanding of core patient safety concepts.

Objectives

The objectives of this study were to (i) examine nursing students’ performance in an interactive patient safety e-learning module titled ‘One shift, four patients … a day in the life of a new graduate nurse’; and (ii) explore students’ level of satisfaction with the module using the Satisfaction with the Patient Safety E-Learning Module scale.

Design

A cross-sectional design was used with students’ knowledge and levels of satisfaction examined using descriptive statistics.

Setting and participants

In total, 1038 third-year undergraduate nursing students from 22 Australian universities attempted the module.

Results

The mean correct score was 74%, but there were significant differences in knowledge levels evident across the four activities that comprised the module. Participants achieved the highest mean score in Activity 2 (Predicting, monitoring, and responding to adverse events [79%]) and the lowest in Activity 3 (Clinical reasoning [66%]). The mean score for Activity 1 (Infection control and medication safety) was 74%, and for Activity 4 (Cultural competence), the score was 77%.

The level of student satisfaction with the module was high with responses to each survey item exceeding 4.0 out of 5.0. The Cronbach’s alpha for the satisfaction scale was 0.99, and the Content Validity Index was >0.9.

Conclusions

Universities are responsible for preparing nursing students to become safe clinicians. The results from this study indicate that participants’ overall level of knowledge of key patient safety concepts was adequate. However, as knowledge is the foundation for safe practice, these results suggest that further attention to imbedding patient safety in nursing curricula is required.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Collegian
Collegian NURSING-
CiteScore
2.70
自引率
6.70%
发文量
127
审稿时长
72 days
期刊介绍: Collegian: The Australian Journal of Nursing Practice, Scholarship and Research is the official journal of Australian College of Nursing (ACN). The journal aims to reflect the broad interests of nurses and the nursing profession, and to challenge nurses on emerging areas of interest. It publishes research articles and scholarly discussion of nursing practice, policy and professional issues. Papers published in the journal are peer reviewed by a double blind process using reviewers who meet high standards of academic and clinical expertise. Invited papers that contribute to nursing knowledge and debate are published at the discretion of the Editor. The journal, online only from 2016, is available to members of ACN and also by separate subscription. ACN believes that each and every nurse in Australia should have the opportunity to grow their career through quality education, and further our profession through representation. ACN is the voice of influence, providing the nursing expertise and experience required when government and key stakeholders are deciding the future of health.
期刊最新文献
Editorial Board A qualitative analysis of the role of the Hospital in the Home registered nurse in Australia Evaluating a community nursing education program to support patients during chemotherapy treatment Exploring the experiences of nurses working in the outdoor COVID-19 testing clinics: A qualitative descriptive study The impact of an intravenous e-learning application on nursing students’ knowledge level: A quasi-experimental study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1