分心的觅食者:竞争者损害了东部灰松鼠的觅食效率、准确性和速度

IF 4.6 Q2 MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS ACS Applied Bio Materials Pub Date : 2024-07-14 DOI:10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.06.017
Julie A. Teichroeb, Hossein Ghorbani, Kian Fallah, Eric N. Vasey
{"title":"分心的觅食者:竞争者损害了东部灰松鼠的觅食效率、准确性和速度","authors":"Julie A. Teichroeb,&nbsp;Hossein Ghorbani,&nbsp;Kian Fallah,&nbsp;Eric N. Vasey","doi":"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.06.017","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Social foraging can be beneficial, but it can also disrupt optimal foraging strategies. Animals possess limited capacity for attention allocation and distractions may impact their rates of food acquisition. Attention to conspecific food competitors can prevent kleptoparasitism but likely affects food intake in multiple ways. We used two field experiments to assess the impact of nearby competitors on urban eastern grey squirrel, <em>Sciurus carolinensis</em>, foraging in a forest setting on the University of Toronto Scarborough campus. We used a tube apparatus in the first experiment to examine foraging efficiency and a tipping container apparatus in the second experiment to examine foraging speed (handling time) and accuracy. Competing squirrels within 1<!--> <!-->m or having just been involved in chasing or aggressive physical contact with competitors led to decreases in foraging efficiency, speed and accuracy. Competitors within 5<!--> <!-->m of focal squirrels did not impact foraging measures. Over the course of the experiments, squirrels adapted to solving foraging apparatuses in the presence of competitor(s) and improved their efficiency and accuracy but not their speed. Vigilance rates were greater for squirrels that had competitors nearby; thus, decreases in foraging efficiency, accuracy and speed seemed to be caused by the need to allocate attention to conspecifics. These experiments show that social foraging impairs optimal food acquisition for individual eastern grey squirrels.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":2,"journal":{"name":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":4.6000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224001805/pdfft?md5=5e096afa7b1d41616e1d906e4f183bff&pid=1-s2.0-S0003347224001805-main.pdf","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Distracted foragers: competitors impair foraging efficiency, accuracy and speed for eastern grey squirrels\",\"authors\":\"Julie A. Teichroeb,&nbsp;Hossein Ghorbani,&nbsp;Kian Fallah,&nbsp;Eric N. Vasey\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.anbehav.2024.06.017\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>Social foraging can be beneficial, but it can also disrupt optimal foraging strategies. Animals possess limited capacity for attention allocation and distractions may impact their rates of food acquisition. Attention to conspecific food competitors can prevent kleptoparasitism but likely affects food intake in multiple ways. We used two field experiments to assess the impact of nearby competitors on urban eastern grey squirrel, <em>Sciurus carolinensis</em>, foraging in a forest setting on the University of Toronto Scarborough campus. We used a tube apparatus in the first experiment to examine foraging efficiency and a tipping container apparatus in the second experiment to examine foraging speed (handling time) and accuracy. Competing squirrels within 1<!--> <!-->m or having just been involved in chasing or aggressive physical contact with competitors led to decreases in foraging efficiency, speed and accuracy. Competitors within 5<!--> <!-->m of focal squirrels did not impact foraging measures. Over the course of the experiments, squirrels adapted to solving foraging apparatuses in the presence of competitor(s) and improved their efficiency and accuracy but not their speed. Vigilance rates were greater for squirrels that had competitors nearby; thus, decreases in foraging efficiency, accuracy and speed seemed to be caused by the need to allocate attention to conspecifics. These experiments show that social foraging impairs optimal food acquisition for individual eastern grey squirrels.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":2,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"volume\":null,\"pages\":null},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.6000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224001805/pdfft?md5=5e096afa7b1d41616e1d906e4f183bff&pid=1-s2.0-S0003347224001805-main.pdf\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"ACS Applied Bio Materials\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"99\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224001805\",\"RegionNum\":0,\"RegionCategory\":null,\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ACS Applied Bio Materials","FirstCategoryId":"99","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0003347224001805","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"MATERIALS SCIENCE, BIOMATERIALS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

社交觅食可能是有益的,但也可能破坏最佳觅食策略。动物的注意力分配能力有限,分心可能会影响它们获取食物的速度。注意同种的食物竞争者可以防止偷食,但也可能以多种方式影响食物摄取。我们使用了两个野外实验来评估附近的竞争者对在多伦多大学士嘉堡校区森林环境中觅食的城市东部灰松鼠的影响。我们在第一个实验中使用管状装置来检测觅食效率,在第二个实验中使用倾倒容器装置来检测觅食速度(处理时间)和准确性。1米内的竞争松鼠或刚刚与竞争松鼠发生过追逐或攻击性身体接触的松鼠会导致觅食效率、速度和准确性下降。距离目标松鼠 5 米以内的竞争者不会影响觅食效率。在实验过程中,松鼠适应了有竞争者存在时的觅食装置,提高了效率和准确性,但没有提高速度。附近有竞争者的松鼠的警惕率更高;因此,觅食效率、准确性和速度的下降似乎是由于需要将注意力分配给同类造成的。这些实验表明,社群觅食会影响东部灰松鼠个体获取食物的最佳状态。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Distracted foragers: competitors impair foraging efficiency, accuracy and speed for eastern grey squirrels

Social foraging can be beneficial, but it can also disrupt optimal foraging strategies. Animals possess limited capacity for attention allocation and distractions may impact their rates of food acquisition. Attention to conspecific food competitors can prevent kleptoparasitism but likely affects food intake in multiple ways. We used two field experiments to assess the impact of nearby competitors on urban eastern grey squirrel, Sciurus carolinensis, foraging in a forest setting on the University of Toronto Scarborough campus. We used a tube apparatus in the first experiment to examine foraging efficiency and a tipping container apparatus in the second experiment to examine foraging speed (handling time) and accuracy. Competing squirrels within 1 m or having just been involved in chasing or aggressive physical contact with competitors led to decreases in foraging efficiency, speed and accuracy. Competitors within 5 m of focal squirrels did not impact foraging measures. Over the course of the experiments, squirrels adapted to solving foraging apparatuses in the presence of competitor(s) and improved their efficiency and accuracy but not their speed. Vigilance rates were greater for squirrels that had competitors nearby; thus, decreases in foraging efficiency, accuracy and speed seemed to be caused by the need to allocate attention to conspecifics. These experiments show that social foraging impairs optimal food acquisition for individual eastern grey squirrels.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
ACS Applied Bio Materials
ACS Applied Bio Materials Chemistry-Chemistry (all)
CiteScore
9.40
自引率
2.10%
发文量
464
期刊最新文献
A Systematic Review of Sleep Disturbance in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension. Advancing Patient Education in Idiopathic Intracranial Hypertension: The Promise of Large Language Models. Anti-Myelin-Associated Glycoprotein Neuropathy: Recent Developments. Approach to Managing the Initial Presentation of Multiple Sclerosis: A Worldwide Practice Survey. Association Between LACE+ Index Risk Category and 90-Day Mortality After Stroke.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1