{"title":"接受免疫检查点阻断疗法的非小细胞肺癌和原有自身免疫性疾病患者的风险和生存率:一项全国性多机构回顾性研究的反概率加权生存分析 (NEJ047)","authors":"Tetsuhiko Asao , Takehito Shukuya , Kohei Uemura , Rui Kitadai , Gaku Yamamoto , Atsuto Mouri , Meiyo Tamaoka , Ryosuke Imai , Yoko Tsukita , Kazutoshi Isobe , Satoshi Watanabe , Mitsuhiro Kamimura , Ryo Morita , Keita Kudo , Minehiko Inomata , Kazunari Tateishi , Kazutaka Kakinuma , Hiroshige Yoshioka , Yukiko Namba , Issei Sumiyoshi , Kazuhisa Takahashi","doi":"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107894","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010–February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8–37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40–21.61]; <em>P</em> = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2–57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26–0.70]; <em>P</em> = 0.0006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18129,"journal":{"name":"Lung Cancer","volume":"194 ","pages":"Article 107894"},"PeriodicalIF":4.5000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047)\",\"authors\":\"Tetsuhiko Asao , Takehito Shukuya , Kohei Uemura , Rui Kitadai , Gaku Yamamoto , Atsuto Mouri , Meiyo Tamaoka , Ryosuke Imai , Yoko Tsukita , Kazutoshi Isobe , Satoshi Watanabe , Mitsuhiro Kamimura , Ryo Morita , Keita Kudo , Minehiko Inomata , Kazunari Tateishi , Kazutaka Kakinuma , Hiroshige Yoshioka , Yukiko Namba , Issei Sumiyoshi , Kazuhisa Takahashi\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.lungcan.2024.107894\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><h3>Background</h3><p>The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established.</p></div><div><h3>Patients and methods</h3><p>This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan.</p></div><div><h3>Results</h3><p>In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010–February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8–37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40–21.61]; <em>P</em> = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2–57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26–0.70]; <em>P</em> = 0.0006).</p></div><div><h3>Conclusions</h3><p>These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18129,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"volume\":\"194 \",\"pages\":\"Article 107894\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":4.5000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-14\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Lung Cancer\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"3\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004288\",\"RegionNum\":2,\"RegionCategory\":\"医学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q1\",\"JCRName\":\"ONCOLOGY\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lung Cancer","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0169500224004288","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"ONCOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
Risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer and pre-existing autoimmune disorders receiving immune checkpoint blockade therapy: Survival analysis with inverse probability weighting from a nationwide, multi-institutional, retrospective study (NEJ047)
Background
The risk and survival of patients with non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) with pre-existing autoimmune disorders (AIDs) receiving immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) therapy have not been clearly established.
Patients and methods
This multi-institutional, retrospective cohort study was conducted in collaboration with 20 centers in Japan.
Results
In total, 229 patients with advanced or recurrent NSCLC and pre-existing AID, with or without ICB treatment from January 2010–February 2020, were included and analyzed. Among 69 patients who received ICB, 2 received two lines of ICBs with a total of 71 ICB treatments; 57 (80.3 %) and 14 (19.7 %) patients received ICB monotherapy and combination therapy, respectively. AID flares were observed in 18 patients (25.4 %, 95 % confidence interval [CI], 15.8–37.1 %) receiving ICB. AID exacerbations were more likely when NSCLC was diagnosed less than 1 year after the AID diagnosis (odds ratio 5.26 [95 % CI, 1.40–21.61]; P = 0.016). Immune-related adverse events were observed in 32 patients (45.1 %, 95 % CI, 33.2–57.3 %); 17 had grade 3 or higher. The safety profile of combination immunotherapy was not significantly different from that of the monotherapy. After inverse probability weighting, the use of ICB prolonged survival (hazard ratio 0.43 [95 % CI, 0.26–0.70]; P = 0.0006).
Conclusions
These findings revealed a novel risk factor for AID flares following ICB treatment, that is the diagnosis of NSCLC within 1 year of AID diagnosis, and showed that ICBs may improve survival in this population. These results support the utilization of ICB in patients with NSCLC and pre-existing AID.
期刊介绍:
Lung Cancer is an international publication covering the clinical, translational and basic science of malignancies of the lung and chest region.Original research articles, early reports, review articles, editorials and correspondence covering the prevention, epidemiology and etiology, basic biology, pathology, clinical assessment, surgery, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, combined treatment modalities, other treatment modalities and outcomes of lung cancer are welcome.