断奶后发育方式对牧场肉用小母牛春季放牧模式的影响

IF 1.8 3区 农林科学 Q2 AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE Livestock Science Pub Date : 2024-07-08 DOI:10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105523
F.Guadalupe Continanza , Andres F. Cibils , Mark K. Petersen , Jennifer M. Muscha , Andrew J. Roberts , Caitriana Steele , Sergio Soto-Navarro , Robert L. Steiner , Huiping Cao , Qixu Gong
{"title":"断奶后发育方式对牧场肉用小母牛春季放牧模式的影响","authors":"F.Guadalupe Continanza ,&nbsp;Andres F. Cibils ,&nbsp;Mark K. Petersen ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Muscha ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Roberts ,&nbsp;Caitriana Steele ,&nbsp;Sergio Soto-Navarro ,&nbsp;Robert L. Steiner ,&nbsp;Huiping Cao ,&nbsp;Qixu Gong","doi":"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105523","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We determined the influence of post-weaning development method on rangeland grazing patterns of beef heifers during early and late spring. We compared behavior of heifers wintered on rangeland (group-fed cake, GFC or self-fed protein, SFP supplements during winter) or in a pen where they were fed silage (pen-fed silage, PFS). In April and May of each year (n = 3), heifers (n = 95) were fitted with Lotek 3300LR GPS collars and monitored 18 days each month. PFS heifers traveled farther than SFP and GFC counterparts on the first few days in April (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). PFS heifers covered larger areas of the pasture compared to GFC and SFP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) counterparts during May. All heifers followed trajectories of similar sinuosity (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). On most days, PFS heifers allocated more time to resting (April) and traveling (April and May) than heifers in SFP treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). SFP heifers spent significantly more time grazing than PFS and GFC counterparts during April (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). However, differences in foraging patterns decreased through time. All heifers spent more time grazing (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) on cloudy days with higher humidity during April and less time grazing on windy and rainy days in May (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Pixel Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) appeared to influence pasture use patterns regardless of treatment. Traveling and resting time, as well as pixel residence time were the three variables that best discriminated heifers into treatment groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Collared heifers tended to associate with heifers of their own/other treatment group (prevailing PFS-GFC or GFC-SFP heifers). The social role of a collared heifer in the herd did not appear to be associated with development treatment. Post-weaning development protocols modified movement, activity, and habitat use of heifers during early spring. Initial animal state and/or metabolic memory may have been responsible for the differences observed. Such differences, however, were possibly attenuated by social facilitation.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":18152,"journal":{"name":"Livestock Science","volume":"286 ","pages":"Article 105523"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2024-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":"{\"title\":\"Effect of post-weaning development method on spring grazing patterns of rangeland beef heifers\",\"authors\":\"F.Guadalupe Continanza ,&nbsp;Andres F. Cibils ,&nbsp;Mark K. Petersen ,&nbsp;Jennifer M. Muscha ,&nbsp;Andrew J. Roberts ,&nbsp;Caitriana Steele ,&nbsp;Sergio Soto-Navarro ,&nbsp;Robert L. Steiner ,&nbsp;Huiping Cao ,&nbsp;Qixu Gong\",\"doi\":\"10.1016/j.livsci.2024.105523\",\"DOIUrl\":null,\"url\":null,\"abstract\":\"<div><p>We determined the influence of post-weaning development method on rangeland grazing patterns of beef heifers during early and late spring. We compared behavior of heifers wintered on rangeland (group-fed cake, GFC or self-fed protein, SFP supplements during winter) or in a pen where they were fed silage (pen-fed silage, PFS). In April and May of each year (n = 3), heifers (n = 95) were fitted with Lotek 3300LR GPS collars and monitored 18 days each month. PFS heifers traveled farther than SFP and GFC counterparts on the first few days in April (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). PFS heifers covered larger areas of the pasture compared to GFC and SFP (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05) counterparts during May. All heifers followed trajectories of similar sinuosity (<em>P</em> &gt; 0.05). On most days, PFS heifers allocated more time to resting (April) and traveling (April and May) than heifers in SFP treatment (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). SFP heifers spent significantly more time grazing than PFS and GFC counterparts during April (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). However, differences in foraging patterns decreased through time. All heifers spent more time grazing (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01) on cloudy days with higher humidity during April and less time grazing on windy and rainy days in May (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.05). Pixel Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) appeared to influence pasture use patterns regardless of treatment. Traveling and resting time, as well as pixel residence time were the three variables that best discriminated heifers into treatment groups (<em>P</em> &lt; 0.01). Collared heifers tended to associate with heifers of their own/other treatment group (prevailing PFS-GFC or GFC-SFP heifers). The social role of a collared heifer in the herd did not appear to be associated with development treatment. Post-weaning development protocols modified movement, activity, and habitat use of heifers during early spring. Initial animal state and/or metabolic memory may have been responsible for the differences observed. Such differences, however, were possibly attenuated by social facilitation.</p></div>\",\"PeriodicalId\":18152,\"journal\":{\"name\":\"Livestock Science\",\"volume\":\"286 \",\"pages\":\"Article 105523\"},\"PeriodicalIF\":1.8000,\"publicationDate\":\"2024-07-08\",\"publicationTypes\":\"Journal Article\",\"fieldsOfStudy\":null,\"isOpenAccess\":false,\"openAccessPdf\":\"\",\"citationCount\":\"0\",\"resultStr\":null,\"platform\":\"Semanticscholar\",\"paperid\":null,\"PeriodicalName\":\"Livestock Science\",\"FirstCategoryId\":\"97\",\"ListUrlMain\":\"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001306\",\"RegionNum\":3,\"RegionCategory\":\"农林科学\",\"ArticlePicture\":[],\"TitleCN\":null,\"AbstractTextCN\":null,\"PMCID\":null,\"EPubDate\":\"\",\"PubModel\":\"\",\"JCR\":\"Q2\",\"JCRName\":\"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE\",\"Score\":null,\"Total\":0}","platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Livestock Science","FirstCategoryId":"97","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1871141324001306","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"农林科学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"AGRICULTURE, DAIRY & ANIMAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

摘要

我们测定了断奶后发育方式对肉用小母牛早春和晚春放牧模式的影响。我们比较了在牧场越冬的小母牛(冬季群喂饼粕,GFC 或自喂蛋白质,SFP 补充剂)或在围栏中饲喂青贮饲料的小母牛(围栏饲喂青贮饲料,PFS)的行为。每年 4 月和 5 月(n = 3),为母牛(n = 95)安装 Lotek 3300LR GPS 项圈,每月监测 18 天。在四月份的头几天,PFS 小母牛比 SFP 和 GFC 小母牛走得更远 (P < 0.05)。在 5 月份,PFS 小母牛覆盖的牧场面积比 GFC 和 SFP 小母牛大(P < 0.05)。所有小母牛的运动轨迹都具有相似的蜿蜒度(P > 0.05)。在大多数日子里,PFS 母牛用于休息(4 月)和行进(4 月和 5 月)的时间比 SFP 母牛多(P < 0.05)。四月份,SFP 母牛的放牧时间明显多于 PFS 和 GFC 母牛(P < 0.01)。然而,随着时间的推移,觅食模式的差异逐渐减小。所有小母牛在四月份湿度较高的阴天放牧的时间更长(P <0.01),而在五月份刮风下雨的日子放牧的时间较少(P <0.05)。像素归一化差异植被指数(NDVI)似乎会影响牧草的使用模式,而与处理方法无关。旅行和休息时间以及像素停留时间是将小母牛分为不同处理组的三个最佳变量(P < 0.01)。佩戴项圈的小母牛倾向于与本组或其他处理组(PFS-GFC 或 GFC-SFP 小母牛)的小母牛交往。戴领小母牛在牛群中的社会角色似乎与发育处理无关。断奶后的发育方案改变了小母牛在早春的运动、活动和栖息地使用。动物的初始状态和/或新陈代谢记忆可能是造成观察到的差异的原因。不过,这种差异可能会因社会促进作用而减弱。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Effect of post-weaning development method on spring grazing patterns of rangeland beef heifers

We determined the influence of post-weaning development method on rangeland grazing patterns of beef heifers during early and late spring. We compared behavior of heifers wintered on rangeland (group-fed cake, GFC or self-fed protein, SFP supplements during winter) or in a pen where they were fed silage (pen-fed silage, PFS). In April and May of each year (n = 3), heifers (n = 95) were fitted with Lotek 3300LR GPS collars and monitored 18 days each month. PFS heifers traveled farther than SFP and GFC counterparts on the first few days in April (P < 0.05). PFS heifers covered larger areas of the pasture compared to GFC and SFP (P < 0.05) counterparts during May. All heifers followed trajectories of similar sinuosity (P > 0.05). On most days, PFS heifers allocated more time to resting (April) and traveling (April and May) than heifers in SFP treatment (P < 0.05). SFP heifers spent significantly more time grazing than PFS and GFC counterparts during April (P < 0.01). However, differences in foraging patterns decreased through time. All heifers spent more time grazing (P < 0.01) on cloudy days with higher humidity during April and less time grazing on windy and rainy days in May (P < 0.05). Pixel Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI) appeared to influence pasture use patterns regardless of treatment. Traveling and resting time, as well as pixel residence time were the three variables that best discriminated heifers into treatment groups (P < 0.01). Collared heifers tended to associate with heifers of their own/other treatment group (prevailing PFS-GFC or GFC-SFP heifers). The social role of a collared heifer in the herd did not appear to be associated with development treatment. Post-weaning development protocols modified movement, activity, and habitat use of heifers during early spring. Initial animal state and/or metabolic memory may have been responsible for the differences observed. Such differences, however, were possibly attenuated by social facilitation.

求助全文
通过发布文献求助,成功后即可免费获取论文全文。 去求助
来源期刊
Livestock Science
Livestock Science 农林科学-奶制品与动物科学
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.60%
发文量
237
审稿时长
3 months
期刊介绍: Livestock Science promotes the sound development of the livestock sector by publishing original, peer-reviewed research and review articles covering all aspects of this broad field. The journal welcomes submissions on the avant-garde areas of animal genetics, breeding, growth, reproduction, nutrition, physiology, and behaviour in addition to genetic resources, welfare, ethics, health, management and production systems. The high-quality content of this journal reflects the truly international nature of this broad area of research.
期刊最新文献
What is the impact of neutral detergent fibre digestibility on productive performance of beef cattle fed tropical forages? Characterization and mitigation measures for carbon dioxide, methane, and ammonia emissions in dairy barns Editorial Board Genetic markers associated with beef quality: A review Whole genome resequencing analysis elucidate genetic features and signature of selection in binhu buffaloes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1